RANDSTAD NV (RAND.AS)
NL0000379121 - Common Stock
Taking everything into account, RAND scores 5 out of 10 in our fundamental rating. RAND was compared to 30 industry peers in the Professional Services industry. RAND has an excellent financial health rating, but there are some minor concerns on its profitability. RAND is valued correctly, but it does not seem to be growing. Finally RAND also has an excellent dividend rating.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
RAND had positive earnings in the past year.
In the past year RAND had a positive cash flow from operations.
Each year in the past 5 years RAND has been profitable.
Each year in the past 5 years RAND had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
With a Return On Assets value of 5.09%, RAND perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 51.85% of the companies in the same industry.
RAND has a Return On Equity (13.45%) which is in line with its industry peers.
Looking at the Return On Invested Capital, with a value of 11.28%, RAND is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 66.67% of the companies in the same industry.
Measured over the past 3 years, the Average Return On Invested Capital for RAND is above the industry average of 11.78%.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 5.09% | ||
| ROE | 13.45% | ||
| ROIC | 11.28% |
ROA(3y)6.98%
ROA(5y)5.97%
ROE(3y)15.79%
ROE(5y)13.4%
ROIC(3y)14.3%
ROIC(5y)12.56%
1.3 Margins
RAND's Profit Margin of 2.21% is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. RAND is outperformed by 70.37% of its industry peers.
RAND's Profit Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
With a Operating Margin value of 2.97%, RAND is not doing good in the industry: 74.07% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
RAND's Operating Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
RAND has a worse Gross Margin (20.55%) than 74.07% of its industry peers.
RAND's Gross Margin has been stable in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 2.97% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 2.21% | ||
| GM | 20.55% |
OM growth 3Y15%
OM growth 5Y-3.02%
PM growth 3Y19.25%
PM growth 5Y-3.66%
GM growth 3Y2.89%
GM growth 5Y1.01%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
RAND has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), which means it is creating value.
RAND has less shares outstanding than it did 1 year ago.
Compared to 5 years ago, RAND has less shares outstanding
Compared to 1 year ago, RAND has a worse debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
An Altman-Z score of 3.52 indicates that RAND is not in any danger for bankruptcy at the moment.
The Altman-Z score of RAND (3.52) is better than 70.37% of its industry peers.
The Debt to FCF ratio of RAND is 1.57, which is an excellent value as it means it would take RAND, only 1.57 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
RAND's Debt to FCF ratio of 1.57 is amongst the best of the industry. RAND outperforms 85.19% of its industry peers.
RAND has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.25. This is a healthy value indicating a solid balance between debt and equity.
RAND's Debt to Equity ratio of 0.25 is fine compared to the rest of the industry. RAND outperforms 77.78% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.25 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 1.57 | ||
| Altman-Z | 3.52 |
ROIC/WACC1.6
WACC7.03%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 1.10 indicates that RAND should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
RAND has a Current ratio of 1.10. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: RAND outperforms 48.15% of its industry peers.
RAND has a Quick Ratio of 1.10. This is a normal value and indicates that RAND is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
The Quick ratio of RAND (1.10) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.1 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.1 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The earnings per share for RAND have decreased strongly by -34.69% in the last year.
The Earnings Per Share has been decreasing by -0.18% on average over the past years.
The Revenue has decreased by -7.77% in the past year.
Measured over the past years, RAND shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 1.32% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-34.69%
EPS 3Y20.75%
EPS 5Y-0.18%
EPS Q2Q%-67.16%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-7.77%
Revenue growth 3Y7.06%
Revenue growth 5Y1.32%
Sales Q2Q%-6.66%
3.2 Future
The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 2.62% on average over the next years.
Based on estimates for the next years, RAND will show a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 1.84% on average per year.
EPS Next Y-19.29%
EPS Next 2Y-1.56%
EPS Next 3Y2.62%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year-3.43%
Revenue Next 2Y0.59%
Revenue Next 3Y1.99%
Revenue Next 5Y1.84%
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
The Revenue growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
A Price/Earnings ratio of 13.10 indicates a correct valuation of RAND.
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, RAND is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 66.67% of the companies are valued more expensively.
RAND is valuated rather cheaply when we compare the Price/Earnings ratio to 24.29, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
The Price/Forward Earnings ratio is 10.42, which indicates a very decent valuation of RAND.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, RAND is valued cheaper than 81.48% of the companies in the same industry.
When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of RAND to the average of the S&P500 Index (20.35), we can say RAND is valued slightly cheaper.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 13.1 | ||
| Fwd PE | 10.42 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio of RAND indicates a somewhat cheap valuation: RAND is cheaper than 62.96% of the companies listed in the same industry.
RAND's Price/Free Cash Flow ratio is a bit cheaper when compared to the industry. RAND is cheaper than 66.67% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 9.1 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 7.91 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y-1.56%
EPS Next 3Y2.62%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 5.02%, RAND is a good candidate for dividend investing.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 2.60, RAND pays a better dividend. On top of this RAND pays more dividend than 96.30% of the companies listed in the same industry.
Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 2.29, RAND pays a better dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 5.02% |
5.2 History
The dividend of RAND has a limited annual growth rate of 0.75%.
Dividend Growth(5Y)0.75%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
5.3 Sustainability
RAND pays out 96.36% of its income as dividend. This is not a sustainable payout ratio.
RAND's earnings are growing more than its dividend. This makes the dividend growth sustainable.
DP96.36%
EPS Next 2Y-1.56%
EPS Next 3Y2.62%
RANDSTAD NV
AMS:RAND (7/26/2024, 4:11:09 PM)
45.34
+0.39 (+0.87%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorIndustrials
GICS IndustryGroupCommercial & Professional Services
GICS IndustryProfessional Services
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners
Inst Owner Change
Ins Owners
Ins Owner Change
Market Cap8.04B
Analysts
Price Target
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 5.02% |
Dividend Growth(5Y)
DP
Div Incr Years
Div Non Decr Years
Ex-Date
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)
Avg EPS beat(2)
Min EPS beat(2)
Max EPS beat(2)
EPS beat(4)
Avg EPS beat(4)
Min EPS beat(4)
Max EPS beat(4)
EPS beat(8)
Avg EPS beat(8)
EPS beat(12)
Avg EPS beat(12)
EPS beat(16)
Avg EPS beat(16)
Revenue beat(2)
Avg Revenue beat(2)
Min Revenue beat(2)
Max Revenue beat(2)
Revenue beat(4)
Avg Revenue beat(4)
Min Revenue beat(4)
Max Revenue beat(4)
Revenue beat(8)
Avg Revenue beat(8)
Revenue beat(12)
Avg Revenue beat(12)
Revenue beat(16)
Avg Revenue beat(16)
PT rev (1m)
PT rev (3m)
EPS NQ rev (1m)
EPS NQ rev (3m)
EPS NY rev (1m)
EPS NY rev (3m)
Revenue NQ rev (1m)
Revenue NQ rev (3m)
Revenue NY rev (1m)
Revenue NY rev (3m)
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 13.1 | ||
| Fwd PE | 10.42 | ||
| P/S | |||
| P/FCF | |||
| P/OCF | |||
| P/B | |||
| P/tB | |||
| EV/EBITDA |
EPS(TTM)
EY
EPS(NY)
Fwd EY
FCF(TTM)
FCFY
OCF(TTM)
OCFY
SpS
BVpS
TBVpS
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 5.09% | ||
| ROE | 13.45% | ||
| ROCE | |||
| ROIC | |||
| ROICexc | |||
| ROICexgc | |||
| OM | 2.97% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 2.21% | ||
| GM | 20.55% | ||
| FCFM |
ROA(3y)
ROA(5y)
ROE(3y)
ROE(5y)
ROIC(3y)
ROIC(5y)
ROICexc(3y)
ROICexc(5y)
ROICexgc(3y)
ROICexgc(5y)
ROCE(3y)
ROCE(5y)
ROICexcg growth 3Y
ROICexcg growth 5Y
ROICexc growth 3Y
ROICexc growth 5Y
OM growth 3Y
OM growth 5Y
PM growth 3Y
PM growth 5Y
GM growth 3Y
GM growth 5Y
F-Score
Asset Turnover2.3
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.25 | ||
| Debt/FCF | |||
| Debt/EBITDA | |||
| Cap/Depr | |||
| Cap/Sales | |||
| Interest Coverage | |||
| Cash Conversion | |||
| Profit Quality | |||
| Current Ratio | 1.1 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.1 | ||
| Altman-Z |
F-Score
WACC
ROIC/WACC
Cap/Depr(3y)
Cap/Depr(5y)
Cap/Sales(3y)
Cap/Sales(5y)
Profit Quality(3y)
Profit Quality(5y)
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-34.69%
EPS 3Y20.75%
EPS 5Y
EPS Q2Q%
EPS Next Y-19.29%
EPS Next 2Y
EPS Next 3Y
EPS Next 5Y
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-7.77%
Revenue growth 3Y7.06%
Revenue growth 5Y
Sales Q2Q%
Revenue Next Year
Revenue Next 2Y
Revenue Next 3Y
Revenue Next 5Y
EBIT growth 1Y
EBIT growth 3Y
EBIT growth 5Y
EBIT Next Year
EBIT Next 3Y
EBIT Next 5Y
FCF growth 1Y
FCF growth 3Y
FCF growth 5Y
OCF growth 1Y
OCF growth 3Y
OCF growth 5Y