RANDSTAD NV (RAND.AS) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - AMS:RAND - NL0000379121 - Common Stock
34 EUR
-0.69 (-1.99%)
We assign a fundamental rating of 5 out of 10 to RAND. RAND was compared to 33 industry peers in the Professional Services industry. RAND has a great financial health rating, but its profitability evaluates not so good. RAND has a decent growth rate and is not valued too expensively. Finally RAND also has an excellent dividend rating.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year RAND was profitable.
RAND had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
Each year in the past 5 years RAND has been profitable.
Each year in the past 5 years RAND had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
The Return On Assets of RAND (0.49%) is worse than 78.13% of its industry peers.
Looking at the Return On Equity, with a value of 1.33%, RAND is doing worse than 75.00% of the companies in the same industry.
The Return On Invested Capital of RAND (4.68%) is worse than 68.75% of its industry peers.
Measured over the past 3 years, the Average Return On Invested Capital for RAND is in line with the industry average of 11.39%.
The 3 year average ROIC (10.69%) for RAND is well above the current ROIC(4.68%). The reason for the recent decline needs to be investigated.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 0.49% | ||
| ROE | 1.33% | ||
| ROIC | 4.68% |
ROA(3y)5.03%
ROA(5y)5.01%
ROE(3y)11.54%
ROE(5y)11.3%
ROIC(3y)10.69%
ROIC(5y)10.17%
1.3 Margins
RAND's Profit Margin of 0.22% is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. RAND is outperformed by 78.13% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of RAND has declined.
The Operating Margin of RAND (1.58%) is worse than 71.88% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of RAND has declined.
RAND has a worse Gross Margin (18.76%) than 78.13% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of RAND has remained more or less at the same level.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 1.58% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 0.22% | ||
| GM | 18.76% |
OM growth 3Y-19.3%
OM growth 5Y-9.36%
PM growth 3Y-46.34%
PM growth 5Y-28.26%
GM growth 3Y-0.53%
GM growth 5Y-0.32%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) just above the Cost of Capital (WACC), RAND is creating some value.
Compared to 1 year ago, RAND has less shares outstanding
The number of shares outstanding for RAND has been reduced compared to 5 years ago.
RAND has a worse debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
RAND has an Altman-Z score of 3.13. This indicates that RAND is financially healthy and has little risk of bankruptcy at the moment.
RAND has a Altman-Z score of 3.13. This is in the better half of the industry: RAND outperforms 75.00% of its industry peers.
RAND has a debt to FCF ratio of 3.01. This is a good value and a sign of high solvency as RAND would need 3.01 years to pay back of all of its debts.
Looking at the Debt to FCF ratio, with a value of 3.01, RAND belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 87.50% of the companies in the same industry.
RAND has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.41. This is a healthy value indicating a solid balance between debt and equity.
The Debt to Equity ratio of RAND (0.41) is better than 71.88% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.41 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.01 | ||
| Altman-Z | 3.13 |
ROIC/WACC0.7
WACC6.69%
2.3 Liquidity
RAND has a Current Ratio of 1.18. This is a normal value and indicates that RAND is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
RAND has a better Current ratio (1.18) than 62.50% of its industry peers.
RAND has a Quick Ratio of 1.18. This is a normal value and indicates that RAND is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
RAND has a Quick ratio of 1.18. This is in the better half of the industry: RAND outperforms 65.63% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.18 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.18 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The earnings per share for RAND have decreased strongly by -42.77% in the last year.
The earnings per share for RAND have been decreasing by -11.25% on average. This is quite bad
RAND shows a decrease in Revenue. In the last year, the revenue decreased by -3.62%.
Measured over the past years, RAND shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 0.37% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-42.77%
EPS 3Y-19.25%
EPS 5Y-11.25%
EPS Q2Q%-2.86%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-3.62%
Revenue growth 3Y-0.7%
Revenue growth 5Y0.37%
Sales Q2Q%-3.41%
3.2 Future
Based on estimates for the next years, RAND will show a quite strong growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will grow by 16.42% on average per year.
Based on estimates for the next years, RAND will show a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 1.08% on average per year.
EPS Next Y13.21%
EPS Next 2Y17.15%
EPS Next 3Y16.42%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year-2.89%
Revenue Next 2Y-0.21%
Revenue Next 3Y0.94%
Revenue Next 5Y1.08%
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
The Price/Earnings ratio is 17.17, which indicates a rather expensive current valuation of RAND.
RAND's Price/Earnings ratio is a bit cheaper when compared to the industry. RAND is cheaper than 68.75% of the companies in the same industry.
Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio of 25.89, RAND is valued a bit cheaper.
A Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 10.82 indicates a reasonable valuation of RAND.
RAND's Price/Forward Earnings ratio is a bit cheaper when compared to the industry. RAND is cheaper than 78.13% of the companies in the same industry.
Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 34.59, RAND is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 17.17 | ||
| Fwd PE | 10.82 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio of RAND indicates a somewhat cheap valuation: RAND is cheaper than 62.50% of the companies listed in the same industry.
RAND's Price/Free Cash Flow ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. RAND is cheaper than 81.25% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 9.04 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 9.53 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
RAND's PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a correct valuation of the company.
A more expensive valuation may be justified as RAND's earnings are expected to grow with 16.42% in the coming years.
PEG (NY)1.3
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y17.15%
EPS Next 3Y16.42%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
RAND has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 4.67%, which is a nice return.
RAND's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the industry average which is at 3.24. RAND pays more dividend than 87.50% of the companies in the same industry.
RAND's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 2.44.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.67% |
5.2 History
The dividend of RAND has a limited annual growth rate of 0.82%.
Dividend Growth(5Y)0.82%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
5.3 Sustainability
988.46% of the earnings are spent on dividend by RAND. This is not a sustainable payout ratio.
The dividend of RAND is growing, but earnings are growing more, so the dividend growth is sustainable.
DP988.46%
EPS Next 2Y17.15%
EPS Next 3Y16.42%
AMS:RAND (11/14/2025, 7:00:00 PM)
34
-0.69 (-1.99%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorIndustrials
GICS IndustryGroupCommercial & Professional Services
GICS IndustryProfessional Services
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners36.39%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners0.07%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap6.15B
Revenue(TTM)23.34B
Net Income(TTM)52.00M
Analysts70.4
Price Target42.81 (25.91%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.67% |
Yearly Dividend3.6
Dividend Growth(5Y)0.82%
DP988.46%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)1
Avg EPS beat(2)-3.85%
Min EPS beat(2)-13.62%
Max EPS beat(2)5.92%
EPS beat(4)2
Avg EPS beat(4)-17.75%
Min EPS beat(4)-68.93%
Max EPS beat(4)5.92%
EPS beat(8)3
Avg EPS beat(8)-6.89%
EPS beat(12)5
Avg EPS beat(12)-0.53%
EPS beat(16)8
Avg EPS beat(16)0.56%
Revenue beat(2)0
Avg Revenue beat(2)-1.4%
Min Revenue beat(2)-2.11%
Max Revenue beat(2)-0.7%
Revenue beat(4)0
Avg Revenue beat(4)-1.5%
Min Revenue beat(4)-2.35%
Max Revenue beat(4)-0.7%
Revenue beat(8)0
Avg Revenue beat(8)-1.82%
Revenue beat(12)0
Avg Revenue beat(12)-2.05%
Revenue beat(16)1
Avg Revenue beat(16)-1.43%
PT rev (1m)-1.68%
PT rev (3m)-3.17%
EPS NQ rev (1m)-4.63%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-5.58%
EPS NY rev (1m)0.67%
EPS NY rev (3m)-12.45%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)-2.43%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)-2.62%
Revenue NY rev (1m)-0.34%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-0.54%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 17.17 | ||
| Fwd PE | 10.82 | ||
| P/S | 0.26 | ||
| P/FCF | 9.04 | ||
| P/OCF | 8.18 | ||
| P/B | 1.58 | ||
| P/tB | 12.55 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 9.53 |
EPS(TTM)1.98
EY5.82%
EPS(NY)3.14
Fwd EY9.24%
FCF(TTM)3.76
FCFY11.06%
OCF(TTM)4.16
OCFY12.23%
SpS129.07
BVpS21.54
TBVpS2.71
PEG (NY)1.3
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number30.98
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 0.49% | ||
| ROE | 1.33% | ||
| ROCE | 6.38% | ||
| ROIC | 4.68% | ||
| ROICexc | 4.93% | ||
| ROICexgc | 12.94% | ||
| OM | 1.58% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 0.22% | ||
| GM | 18.76% | ||
| FCFM | 2.91% |
ROA(3y)5.03%
ROA(5y)5.01%
ROE(3y)11.54%
ROE(5y)11.3%
ROIC(3y)10.69%
ROIC(5y)10.17%
ROICexc(3y)11.23%
ROICexc(5y)11.02%
ROICexgc(3y)28.75%
ROICexgc(5y)27.98%
ROCE(3y)14.58%
ROCE(5y)13.92%
ROICexgc growth 3Y-23%
ROICexgc growth 5Y-12.23%
ROICexc growth 3Y-22.85%
ROICexc growth 5Y-11%
OM growth 3Y-19.3%
OM growth 5Y-9.36%
PM growth 3Y-46.34%
PM growth 5Y-28.26%
GM growth 3Y-0.53%
GM growth 5Y-0.32%
F-Score5
Asset Turnover2.18
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.41 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.01 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 1.93 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 15.69% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 0.31% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 250 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 90.71% | ||
| Profit Quality | 1307.69% | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.18 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.18 | ||
| Altman-Z | 3.13 |
F-Score5
WACC6.69%
ROIC/WACC0.7
Cap/Depr(3y)26.18%
Cap/Depr(5y)27.91%
Cap/Sales(3y)0.39%
Cap/Sales(5y)0.44%
Profit Quality(3y)257.77%
Profit Quality(5y)266.96%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-42.77%
EPS 3Y-19.25%
EPS 5Y-11.25%
EPS Q2Q%-2.86%
EPS Next Y13.21%
EPS Next 2Y17.15%
EPS Next 3Y16.42%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-3.62%
Revenue growth 3Y-0.7%
Revenue growth 5Y0.37%
Sales Q2Q%-3.41%
Revenue Next Year-2.89%
Revenue Next 2Y-0.21%
Revenue Next 3Y0.94%
Revenue Next 5Y1.08%
EBIT growth 1Y-36.21%
EBIT growth 3Y-19.87%
EBIT growth 5Y-9.02%
EBIT Next Year28.65%
EBIT Next 3Y16.52%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-38.63%
FCF growth 3Y-10.42%
FCF growth 5Y-13.2%
OCF growth 1Y-37.85%
OCF growth 3Y-10.79%
OCF growth 5Y-12.55%
RANDSTAD NV / RAND.AS FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for RANDSTAD NV?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to RAND.AS.
What is the valuation status of RANDSTAD NV (RAND.AS) stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 6 / 10 to RANDSTAD NV (RAND.AS). This can be considered as Fairly Valued.
What is the profitability of RAND stock?
RANDSTAD NV (RAND.AS) has a profitability rating of 3 / 10.
What is the expected EPS growth for RANDSTAD NV (RAND.AS) stock?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of RANDSTAD NV (RAND.AS) is expected to grow by 13.21% in the next year.
Can you provide the dividend sustainability for RAND stock?
The dividend rating of RANDSTAD NV (RAND.AS) is 7 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 988.46%.