NL0000379121 - Common Stock

Taking everything into account, **RAND** scores **5** out of 10 in our fundamental rating. **RAND** was compared to 33 industry peers in the **Professional Services** industry. **RAND** has an excellent financial health rating, but there are some minor concerns on its profitability. **RAND** has a valuation in line with the averages, but it does not seem to be growing. Finally **RAND** also has an excellent dividend rating.

In the past year **RAND** was profitable.

In the past 5 years **RAND** always reported a positive cash flow from operatings.

With a decent **Return On Invested Capital** value of **11.28%**, **RAND** is doing good in the industry, outperforming **64.52%** of the companies in the same industry.

Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
---|---|---|---|

ROA | 5.09% | ||

ROE | 13.45% | ||

ROIC | 11.28% |

ROA(3y)6.98%

ROA(5y)5.97%

ROE(3y)15.79%

ROE(5y)13.4%

ROIC(3y)14.3%

ROIC(5y)12.56%

In the last couple of years the **Profit Margin** of **RAND** has declined.

In the last couple of years the **Operating Margin** of **RAND** has declined.

The **Gross Margin** of **RAND** (**20.55%**) is worse than **74.19%** of its industry peers.

Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
---|---|---|---|

OM | 2.97% | ||

PM (TTM) | 2.21% | ||

GM | 20.55% |

OM growth 3Y15%

OM growth 5Y-3.02%

PM growth 3Y19.25%

PM growth 5Y-3.66%

GM growth 3Y2.89%

GM growth 5Y1.01%

The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), so **RAND** is creating value.

Compared to 1 year ago, **RAND** has less shares outstanding

The number of shares outstanding for **RAND** has been reduced compared to 5 years ago.

Compared to 1 year ago, **RAND** has a worse debt to assets ratio.

An Altman-Z score of **3.54** indicates that **RAND** is not in any danger for bankruptcy at the moment.

The Debt to FCF ratio of **RAND** is **1.57**, which is an excellent value as it means it would take **RAND**, only **1.57** years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.

With an excellent **Debt to FCF ratio** value of **1.57**, **RAND** belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming **87.10%** of the companies in the same industry.

A Debt/Equity ratio of **0.25** indicates that **RAND** is not too dependend on debt financing.

Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
---|---|---|---|

Debt/Equity | 0.25 | ||

Debt/FCF | 1.57 | ||

Altman-Z | 3.54 |

ROIC/WACC1.64

WACC6.86%

A Current Ratio of **1.10** indicates that **RAND** should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.

Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
---|---|---|---|

Current Ratio | 1.1 | ||

Quick Ratio | 1.1 |

The earnings per share for **RAND** have decreased strongly by **-25.27%** in the last year.

EPS 1Y (TTM)-25.27%

EPS 3Y20.75%

EPS 5Y-0.18%

EPS Q2Q%-33.65%

Revenue 1Y (TTM)-9.54%

Revenue growth 3Y7.06%

Revenue growth 5Y1.32%

Sales Q2Q%-8.9%

Based on estimates for the next years, **RAND** will show a small growth in **Earnings Per Share**. The EPS will grow by **2.62%** on average per year.

The **Revenue** is expected to grow by **1.84%** on average over the next years.

EPS Next Y-19.29%

EPS Next 2Y-1.56%

EPS Next 3Y2.62%

EPS Next 5YN/A

Revenue Next Year-3.43%

Revenue Next 2Y0.59%

Revenue Next 3Y1.99%

Revenue Next 5Y1.84%

When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.

When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.

Based on the **Price/Earnings** ratio, **RAND** is valued cheaply inside the industry as 80.65% of the companies are valued more expensively.

When comparing the **Price/Earnings** ratio of **RAND** to the average of the S&P500 Index (**28.63**), we can say **RAND** is valued rather cheaply.

Based on the **Price/Forward Earnings** ratio of **10.43**, the valuation of **RAND** can be described as reasonable.

Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
---|---|---|---|

PE | 10.96 | ||

Fwd PE | 10.43 |

61.29% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than **RAND**, based on the **Enterprise Value to EBITDA** ratio.

70.97% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than **RAND**, based on the **Price/Free Cash Flow** ratio.

Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
---|---|---|---|

P/FCF | 9.11 | ||

EV/EBITDA | 8.08 |

PEG (NY)N/A

PEG (5Y)N/A

EPS Next 2Y-1.56%

EPS Next 3Y2.62%

Compared to an average S&P500 **Dividend Yield** of **2.38**, **RAND** pays a better dividend.

Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
---|---|---|---|

Dividend Yield | 4.95% |

The dividend of **RAND** has a limited annual growth rate of **0.75%**.

Dividend Growth(5Y)0.75%

Div Incr Years1

Div Non Decr Years1

The dividend of **RAND** is growing, but earnings are growing more, so the dividend growth is sustainable.

DP96.36%

EPS Next 2Y-1.56%

EPS Next 3Y2.62%

**RANDSTAD NV**

AMS:RAND (6/21/2024, 7:00:00 PM)

**45.36**

**-0.7 (-1.52%) **

Chartmill FA Rating

GICS SectorIndustrials

GICS IndustryGroupCommercial & Professional Services

GICS IndustryProfessional Services

Earnings (Last)

Earnings (Next)

Inst Owners

Inst Owner Change

Ins Owners

Ins Owner Change

Market Cap8.04B

Analysts

Price Target

Dividend

Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
---|---|---|---|

Dividend Yield | 4.95% |

Dividend Growth(5Y)

DP

Div Incr Years

Div Non Decr Years

Ex-Date

Surprises & Revisions

EPS beat(2)

Avg EPS beat(2)

Min EPS beat(2)

Max EPS beat(2)

EPS beat(4)

Avg EPS beat(4)

Min EPS beat(4)

Max EPS beat(4)

EPS beat(8)

Avg EPS beat(8)

EPS beat(12)

Avg EPS beat(12)

EPS beat(16)

Avg EPS beat(16)

Revenue beat(2)

Avg Revenue beat(2)

Min Revenue beat(2)

Max Revenue beat(2)

Revenue beat(4)

Avg Revenue beat(4)

Min Revenue beat(4)

Max Revenue beat(4)

Revenue beat(8)

Avg Revenue beat(8)

Revenue beat(12)

Avg Revenue beat(12)

Revenue beat(16)

Avg Revenue beat(16)

PT rev (1m)

PT rev (3m)

EPS NQ rev (1m)

EPS NQ rev (3m)

EPS NY rev (1m)

EPS NY rev (3m)

Revenue NQ rev (1m)

Revenue NQ rev (3m)

Revenue NY rev (1m)

Revenue NY rev (3m)

Valuation

Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
---|---|---|---|

PE | 10.96 | ||

Fwd PE | 10.43 | ||

P/S | |||

P/FCF | |||

P/OCF | |||

P/B | |||

P/tB | |||

EV/EBITDA |

EPS(TTM)

EY

EPS(NY)

Fwd EY

FCF(TTM)

FCFY

OCF(TTM)

OCFY

SpS

BVpS

TBVpS

PEG (NY)N/A

PEG (5Y)N/A

Profitability

Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
---|---|---|---|

ROA | 5.09% | ||

ROE | 13.45% | ||

ROCE | |||

ROIC | |||

ROICexc | |||

ROICexgc | |||

OM | 2.97% | ||

PM (TTM) | 2.21% | ||

GM | 20.55% | ||

FCFM |

ROA(3y)

ROA(5y)

ROE(3y)

ROE(5y)

ROIC(3y)

ROIC(5y)

ROICexc(3y)

ROICexc(5y)

ROICexgc(3y)

ROICexgc(5y)

ROCE(3y)

ROCE(5y)

ROICexcg growth 3Y

ROICexcg growth 5Y

ROICexc growth 3Y

ROICexc growth 5Y

OM growth 3Y

OM growth 5Y

PM growth 3Y

PM growth 5Y

GM growth 3Y

GM growth 5Y

F-Score

Asset Turnover2.3

Health

Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
---|---|---|---|

Debt/Equity | 0.25 | ||

Debt/FCF | |||

Debt/EBITDA | |||

Cap/Depr | |||

Cap/Sales | |||

Interest Coverage | |||

Cash Conversion | |||

Profit Quality | |||

Current Ratio | 1.1 | ||

Quick Ratio | 1.1 | ||

Altman-Z |

F-Score

WACC

ROIC/WACC

Cap/Depr(3y)

Cap/Depr(5y)

Cap/Sales(3y)

Cap/Sales(5y)

Profit Quality(3y)

Profit Quality(5y)

High Growth Momentum

Growth

EPS 1Y (TTM)-25.27%

EPS 3Y20.75%

EPS 5Y

EPS Q2Q%

EPS Next Y-19.29%

EPS Next 2Y

EPS Next 3Y

EPS Next 5Y

Revenue 1Y (TTM)-9.54%

Revenue growth 3Y7.06%

Revenue growth 5Y

Sales Q2Q%

Revenue Next Year

Revenue Next 2Y

Revenue Next 3Y

Revenue Next 5Y

EBIT growth 1Y

EBIT growth 3Y

EBIT growth 5Y

EBIT Next Year

EBIT Next 3Y

EBIT Next 5Y

FCF growth 1Y

FCF growth 3Y

FCF growth 5Y

OCF growth 1Y

OCF growth 3Y

OCF growth 5Y