RANDSTAD NV (RAND.AS) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - Euronext Amsterdam - AMS:RAND - NL0000379121 - Common Stock
31.16 EUR
-0.35 (-1.11%)
Taking everything into account, RAND scores 5 out of 10 in our fundamental rating. RAND was compared to 33 industry peers in the Professional Services industry. While RAND has a great health rating, there are worries on its profitability. RAND may be a bit undervalued, certainly considering the very reasonable score on growth RAND also has an excellent dividend rating.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
RAND had positive earnings in the past year.
In the past year RAND had a positive cash flow from operations.
Each year in the past 5 years RAND has been profitable.
In the past 5 years RAND always reported a positive cash flow from operatings.
1.2 Ratios
Looking at the Return On Assets, with a value of 0.49%, RAND is doing worse than 78.79% of the companies in the same industry.
RAND has a Return On Equity of 1.33%. This is in the lower half of the industry: RAND underperforms 75.76% of its industry peers.
Looking at the Return On Invested Capital, with a value of 4.68%, RAND is doing worse than 69.70% of the companies in the same industry.
RAND had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 10.69%. This is in line with the industry average of 11.10%.
The 3 year average ROIC (10.69%) for RAND is well above the current ROIC(4.68%). The reason for the recent decline needs to be investigated.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 0.49% | ||
| ROE | 1.33% | ||
| ROIC | 4.68% |
ROA(3y)5.03%
ROA(5y)5.01%
ROE(3y)11.54%
ROE(5y)11.3%
ROIC(3y)10.69%
ROIC(5y)10.17%
1.3 Margins
RAND has a Profit Margin of 0.22%. This is in the lower half of the industry: RAND underperforms 78.79% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of RAND has declined.
RAND has a worse Operating Margin (1.58%) than 72.73% of its industry peers.
RAND's Operating Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
RAND has a worse Gross Margin (18.76%) than 78.79% of its industry peers.
RAND's Gross Margin has been stable in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 1.58% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 0.22% | ||
| GM | 18.76% |
OM growth 3Y-19.3%
OM growth 5Y-9.36%
PM growth 3Y-46.34%
PM growth 5Y-28.26%
GM growth 3Y-0.53%
GM growth 5Y-0.32%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
RAND has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is just above the Cost of Capital (WACC), which means it is creating some value.
The number of shares outstanding for RAND has been reduced compared to 1 year ago.
Compared to 5 years ago, RAND has less shares outstanding
RAND has a worse debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
RAND has an Altman-Z score of 3.08. This indicates that RAND is financially healthy and has little risk of bankruptcy at the moment.
The Altman-Z score of RAND (3.08) is better than 69.70% of its industry peers.
The Debt to FCF ratio of RAND is 3.01, which is a good value as it means it would take RAND, 3.01 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
RAND has a better Debt to FCF ratio (3.01) than 81.82% of its industry peers.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 0.41 indicates that RAND is not too dependend on debt financing.
RAND has a better Debt to Equity ratio (0.41) than 69.70% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.41 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.01 | ||
| Altman-Z | 3.08 |
ROIC/WACC0.72
WACC6.54%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 1.18 indicates that RAND should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
RAND has a Current ratio of 1.18. This is in the better half of the industry: RAND outperforms 60.61% of its industry peers.
RAND has a Quick Ratio of 1.18. This is a normal value and indicates that RAND is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
RAND has a better Quick ratio (1.18) than 63.64% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.18 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.18 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The earnings per share for RAND have decreased strongly by -42.77% in the last year.
RAND shows a very negative growth in Earnings Per Share. Measured over the last years, the EPS has been decreasing by -11.25% yearly.
RAND shows a decrease in Revenue. In the last year, the revenue decreased by -3.62%.
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 0.37% on average over the past years.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-42.77%
EPS 3Y-19.25%
EPS 5Y-11.25%
EPS Q2Q%-2.86%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-3.62%
Revenue growth 3Y-0.7%
Revenue growth 5Y0.37%
Sales Q2Q%-3.41%
3.2 Future
RAND is expected to show quite a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. In the coming years, the EPS will grow by 16.58% yearly.
The Revenue is expected to grow by 1.08% on average over the next years.
EPS Next Y13.26%
EPS Next 2Y17.24%
EPS Next 3Y16.58%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year-2.83%
Revenue Next 2Y-0.19%
Revenue Next 3Y0.96%
Revenue Next 5Y1.08%
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
The Revenue growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
With a Price/Earnings ratio of 15.74, RAND is valued correctly.
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, RAND is valued cheaply inside the industry as 84.85% of the companies are valued more expensively.
Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio of 26.61, RAND is valued a bit cheaper.
RAND is valuated reasonably with a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 9.90.
RAND's Price/Forward Earnings ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. RAND is cheaper than 81.82% of the companies in the same industry.
RAND's Price/Forward Earnings ratio indicates a rather cheap valuation when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 24.01.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 15.74 | ||
| Fwd PE | 9.9 |
4.2 Price Multiples
69.70% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than RAND, based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio.
Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, RAND is valued cheaply inside the industry as 81.82% of the companies are valued more expensively.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 8.06 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 8.8 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
RAND's PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a correct valuation of the company.
RAND's earnings are expected to grow with 16.58% in the coming years. This may justify a more expensive valuation.
PEG (NY)1.19
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y17.24%
EPS Next 3Y16.58%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 5.12%, RAND is a good candidate for dividend investing.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 2.41, RAND pays a better dividend. On top of this RAND pays more dividend than 90.91% of the companies listed in the same industry.
Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 1.87, RAND pays a better dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 5.12% |
5.2 History
The dividend of RAND has a limited annual growth rate of 0.82%.
Dividend Growth(5Y)0.82%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
5.3 Sustainability
988.46% of the earnings are spent on dividend by RAND. This is not a sustainable payout ratio.
The dividend of RAND is growing, but earnings are growing more, so the dividend growth is sustainable.
DP988.46%
EPS Next 2Y17.24%
EPS Next 3Y16.58%
AMS:RAND (12/22/2025, 7:00:00 PM)
31.16
-0.35 (-1.11%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorIndustrials
GICS IndustryGroupCommercial & Professional Services
GICS IndustryProfessional Services
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners39.37%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners0.07%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap5.48B
Revenue(TTM)23.34B
Net Income(TTM)52.00M
Analysts70.4
Price Target41.09 (31.87%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 5.12% |
Yearly Dividend3.6
Dividend Growth(5Y)0.82%
DP988.46%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)1
Avg EPS beat(2)-3.85%
Min EPS beat(2)-13.62%
Max EPS beat(2)5.92%
EPS beat(4)2
Avg EPS beat(4)-17.75%
Min EPS beat(4)-68.93%
Max EPS beat(4)5.92%
EPS beat(8)3
Avg EPS beat(8)-6.89%
EPS beat(12)5
Avg EPS beat(12)-0.53%
EPS beat(16)8
Avg EPS beat(16)0.56%
Revenue beat(2)0
Avg Revenue beat(2)-1.4%
Min Revenue beat(2)-2.11%
Max Revenue beat(2)-0.7%
Revenue beat(4)0
Avg Revenue beat(4)-1.5%
Min Revenue beat(4)-2.35%
Max Revenue beat(4)-0.7%
Revenue beat(8)0
Avg Revenue beat(8)-1.82%
Revenue beat(12)0
Avg Revenue beat(12)-2.05%
Revenue beat(16)1
Avg Revenue beat(16)-1.43%
PT rev (1m)-4.02%
PT rev (3m)-6.8%
EPS NQ rev (1m)0%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-5.26%
EPS NY rev (1m)0.04%
EPS NY rev (3m)0.39%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)0%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)-2.62%
Revenue NY rev (1m)0.06%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-0.3%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 15.74 | ||
| Fwd PE | 9.9 | ||
| P/S | 0.23 | ||
| P/FCF | 8.06 | ||
| P/OCF | 7.29 | ||
| P/B | 1.41 | ||
| P/tB | 11.19 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 8.8 |
EPS(TTM)1.98
EY6.35%
EPS(NY)3.15
Fwd EY10.1%
FCF(TTM)3.86
FCFY12.4%
OCF(TTM)4.27
OCFY13.71%
SpS132.65
BVpS22.14
TBVpS2.78
PEG (NY)1.19
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number31.41
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 0.49% | ||
| ROE | 1.33% | ||
| ROCE | 6.38% | ||
| ROIC | 4.68% | ||
| ROICexc | 4.93% | ||
| ROICexgc | 12.94% | ||
| OM | 1.58% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 0.22% | ||
| GM | 18.76% | ||
| FCFM | 2.91% |
ROA(3y)5.03%
ROA(5y)5.01%
ROE(3y)11.54%
ROE(5y)11.3%
ROIC(3y)10.69%
ROIC(5y)10.17%
ROICexc(3y)11.23%
ROICexc(5y)11.02%
ROICexgc(3y)28.75%
ROICexgc(5y)27.98%
ROCE(3y)14.58%
ROCE(5y)13.92%
ROICexgc growth 3Y-23%
ROICexgc growth 5Y-12.23%
ROICexc growth 3Y-22.85%
ROICexc growth 5Y-11%
OM growth 3Y-19.3%
OM growth 5Y-9.36%
PM growth 3Y-46.34%
PM growth 5Y-28.26%
GM growth 3Y-0.53%
GM growth 5Y-0.32%
F-Score5
Asset Turnover2.18
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.41 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.01 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 1.93 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 15.69% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 0.31% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 250 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 90.71% | ||
| Profit Quality | 1307.69% | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.18 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.18 | ||
| Altman-Z | 3.08 |
F-Score5
WACC6.54%
ROIC/WACC0.72
Cap/Depr(3y)26.18%
Cap/Depr(5y)27.91%
Cap/Sales(3y)0.39%
Cap/Sales(5y)0.44%
Profit Quality(3y)257.77%
Profit Quality(5y)266.96%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-42.77%
EPS 3Y-19.25%
EPS 5Y-11.25%
EPS Q2Q%-2.86%
EPS Next Y13.26%
EPS Next 2Y17.24%
EPS Next 3Y16.58%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-3.62%
Revenue growth 3Y-0.7%
Revenue growth 5Y0.37%
Sales Q2Q%-3.41%
Revenue Next Year-2.83%
Revenue Next 2Y-0.19%
Revenue Next 3Y0.96%
Revenue Next 5Y1.08%
EBIT growth 1Y-36.21%
EBIT growth 3Y-19.87%
EBIT growth 5Y-9.02%
EBIT Next Year27.63%
EBIT Next 3Y15.82%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-38.63%
FCF growth 3Y-10.42%
FCF growth 5Y-13.2%
OCF growth 1Y-37.85%
OCF growth 3Y-10.79%
OCF growth 5Y-12.55%
RANDSTAD NV / RAND.AS FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for RANDSTAD NV?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to RAND.AS.
What is the valuation status of RANDSTAD NV (RAND.AS) stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 7 / 10 to RANDSTAD NV (RAND.AS). This can be considered as Undervalued.
What is the profitability of RAND stock?
RANDSTAD NV (RAND.AS) has a profitability rating of 3 / 10.
What is the expected EPS growth for RANDSTAD NV (RAND.AS) stock?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of RANDSTAD NV (RAND.AS) is expected to grow by 13.26% in the next year.
Can you provide the dividend sustainability for RAND stock?
The dividend rating of RANDSTAD NV (RAND.AS) is 7 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 988.46%.