WAREHOUSES DE PAUW SCA (WDP.BR)
BE0974349814 - REIT
WDP gets a fundamental rating of 5 out of 10. The analysis compared the fundamentals against 43 industry peers in the Diversified REITs industry. While WDP has a great profitability rating, there are quite some concerns on its financial health. WDP has a decent growth rate and is not valued too expensively.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
WDP had positive earnings in the past year.
In the past year WDP had a positive cash flow from operations.
Each year in the past 5 years WDP has been profitable.
In the past 5 years WDP always reported a positive cash flow from operatings.
1.2 Ratios
WDP's Return On Assets of 4.44% is amongst the best of the industry. WDP outperforms 90.24% of its industry peers.
WDP has a better Return On Equity (7.33%) than 80.49% of its industry peers.
WDP's Return On Invested Capital of 4.98% is amongst the best of the industry. WDP outperforms 85.37% of its industry peers.
The Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years for WDP is in line with the industry average of 3.49%.
The 3 year average ROIC (3.20%) for WDP is below the current ROIC(4.98%), indicating increased profibility in the last year.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 4.44% | ||
| ROE | 7.33% | ||
| ROIC | 4.98% |
ROA(3y)7.13%
ROA(5y)7.5%
ROE(3y)12.24%
ROE(5y)13.84%
ROIC(3y)3.2%
ROIC(5y)3.33%
1.3 Margins
With an excellent Profit Margin value of 54.60%, WDP belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming 82.93% of the companies in the same industry.
WDP's Profit Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
WDP has a better Operating Margin (79.53%) than 73.17% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of WDP has declined.
With a decent Gross Margin value of 85.48%, WDP is doing good in the industry, outperforming 65.85% of the companies in the same industry.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of WDP has declined.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 79.53% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 54.6% | ||
| GM | 85.48% |
OM growth 3Y-1.68%
OM growth 5Y-1.82%
PM growth 3Y-64.37%
PM growth 5Y-49.3%
GM growth 3Y-1.04%
GM growth 5Y-2.19%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is below the Cost of Capital (WACC), so WDP is destroying value.
Compared to 1 year ago, WDP has more shares outstanding
Compared to 5 years ago, WDP has more shares outstanding
WDP has a better debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
WDP has an Altman-Z score of 1.68. This is a bad value and indicates that WDP is not financially healthy and even has some risk of bankruptcy.
WDP has a Altman-Z score of 1.68. This is amongst the best in the industry. WDP outperforms 95.12% of its industry peers.
WDP has a debt to FCF ratio of 9.79. This is a negative value and a sign of low solvency as WDP would need 9.79 years to pay back of all of its debts.
Looking at the Debt to FCF ratio, with a value of 9.79, WDP belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 80.49% of the companies in the same industry.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 0.58 indicates that WDP is somewhat dependend on debt financing.
WDP's Debt to Equity ratio of 0.58 is fine compared to the rest of the industry. WDP outperforms 70.73% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.58 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 9.79 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.68 |
ROIC/WACC0.93
WACC5.35%
2.3 Liquidity
WDP has a Current Ratio of 0.40. This is a bad value and indicates that WDP is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
With a Current ratio value of 0.40, WDP is not doing good in the industry: 60.98% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
WDP has a Quick Ratio of 0.40. This is a bad value and indicates that WDP is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
WDP has a Quick ratio (0.40) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.4 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.4 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The Earnings Per Share has grown by an impressive 1536.25% over the past year.
Measured over the past years, WDP shows a very negative growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been decreasing by -44.78% on average per year.
The Revenue has grown by 12.25% in the past year. This is quite good.
The Revenue has been growing by 15.14% on average over the past years. This is quite good.
EPS 1Y (TTM)1536.25%
EPS 3Y-61.36%
EPS 5Y-44.78%
EPS Q2Q%574.11%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)12.25%
Revenue growth 3Y14.95%
Revenue growth 5Y15.14%
Sales Q2Q%-50.36%
3.2 Future
WDP is expected to show a small growth in Earnings Per Share. In the coming years, the EPS will grow by 4.21% yearly.
Based on estimates for the next years, WDP will show a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 5.80% on average per year.
EPS Next Y4.71%
EPS Next 2Y4.51%
EPS Next 3Y5.16%
EPS Next 5Y4.21%
Revenue Next Year11.77%
Revenue Next 2Y10.58%
Revenue Next 3Y9.42%
Revenue Next 5Y5.8%
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
With a Price/Earnings ratio of 14.55, WDP is valued correctly.
63.41% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than WDP, based on the Price/Earnings ratio.
When comparing the Price/Earnings ratio of WDP to the average of the S&P500 Index (31.46), we can say WDP is valued rather cheaply.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 14.14, the valuation of WDP can be described as correct.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, WDP is valued a bit more expensive than the industry average as 68.29% of the companies are valued more cheaply.
When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of WDP to the average of the S&P500 Index (22.63), we can say WDP is valued slightly cheaper.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 14.55 | ||
| Fwd PE | 14.14 |
4.2 Price Multiples
WDP's Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio is a bit cheaper when compared to the industry. WDP is cheaper than 68.29% of the companies in the same industry.
Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, WDP is valued a bit more expensive than the industry average as 70.73% of the companies are valued more cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 18.2 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 15.01 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The high PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates WDP does not grow enough to justify the current Price/Earnings ratio.
WDP has a very decent profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)3.09
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y4.51%
EPS Next 3Y5.16%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
WDP has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 3.33%.
WDP's Dividend Yield is slightly below the industry average, which is at 7.06.
Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 2.18, WDP pays a better dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.33% |
5.2 History
On average, the dividend of WDP grows each year by 12.69%, which is quite nice.
Dividend Growth(5Y)12.69%
Div Incr Years3
Div Non Decr Years3
5.3 Sustainability
43.47% of the earnings are spent on dividend by WDP. This is a bit on the high side, but may be sustainable.
The dividend of WDP is growing, but the earnings are growing slower. This means the dividend growth is not sustainable.
DP43.47%
EPS Next 2Y4.51%
EPS Next 3Y5.16%
WAREHOUSES DE PAUW SCA
EBR:WDP (10/22/2024, 5:29:56 PM)
21.82
+0.22 (+1.02%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorReal Estate
GICS IndustryGroupEquity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
GICS IndustryDiversified REITs
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners
Inst Owner Change
Ins Owners
Ins Owner Change
Market Cap4.92B
Analysts
Price Target
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.33% |
Dividend Growth(5Y)
DP
Div Incr Years
Div Non Decr Years
Ex-Date
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)
Avg EPS beat(2)
Min EPS beat(2)
Max EPS beat(2)
EPS beat(4)
Avg EPS beat(4)
Min EPS beat(4)
Max EPS beat(4)
EPS beat(8)
Avg EPS beat(8)
EPS beat(12)
Avg EPS beat(12)
EPS beat(16)
Avg EPS beat(16)
Revenue beat(2)
Avg Revenue beat(2)
Min Revenue beat(2)
Max Revenue beat(2)
Revenue beat(4)
Avg Revenue beat(4)
Min Revenue beat(4)
Max Revenue beat(4)
Revenue beat(8)
Avg Revenue beat(8)
Revenue beat(12)
Avg Revenue beat(12)
Revenue beat(16)
Avg Revenue beat(16)
PT rev (1m)
PT rev (3m)
EPS NQ rev (1m)
EPS NQ rev (3m)
EPS NY rev (1m)
EPS NY rev (3m)
Revenue NQ rev (1m)
Revenue NQ rev (3m)
Revenue NY rev (1m)
Revenue NY rev (3m)
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 14.55 | ||
| Fwd PE | 14.14 | ||
| P/S | |||
| P/FCF | |||
| P/OCF | |||
| P/B | |||
| P/tB | |||
| EV/EBITDA |
EPS(TTM)
EY
EPS(NY)
Fwd EY
FCF(TTM)
FCFY
OCF(TTM)
OCFY
SpS
BVpS
TBVpS
PEG (NY)3.09
PEG (5Y)N/A
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 4.44% | ||
| ROE | 7.33% | ||
| ROCE | |||
| ROIC | |||
| ROICexc | |||
| ROICexgc | |||
| OM | 79.53% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 54.6% | ||
| GM | 85.48% | ||
| FCFM |
ROA(3y)
ROA(5y)
ROE(3y)
ROE(5y)
ROIC(3y)
ROIC(5y)
ROICexc(3y)
ROICexc(5y)
ROICexgc(3y)
ROICexgc(5y)
ROCE(3y)
ROCE(5y)
ROICexcg growth 3Y
ROICexcg growth 5Y
ROICexc growth 3Y
ROICexc growth 5Y
OM growth 3Y
OM growth 5Y
PM growth 3Y
PM growth 5Y
GM growth 3Y
GM growth 5Y
F-Score
Asset Turnover0.08
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.58 | ||
| Debt/FCF | |||
| Debt/EBITDA | |||
| Cap/Depr | |||
| Cap/Sales | |||
| Interest Coverage | |||
| Cash Conversion | |||
| Profit Quality | |||
| Current Ratio | 0.4 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.4 | ||
| Altman-Z |
F-Score
WACC
ROIC/WACC
Cap/Depr(3y)
Cap/Depr(5y)
Cap/Sales(3y)
Cap/Sales(5y)
Profit Quality(3y)
Profit Quality(5y)
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)1536.25%
EPS 3Y-61.36%
EPS 5Y
EPS Q2Q%
EPS Next Y4.71%
EPS Next 2Y
EPS Next 3Y
EPS Next 5Y
Revenue 1Y (TTM)12.25%
Revenue growth 3Y14.95%
Revenue growth 5Y
Sales Q2Q%
Revenue Next Year
Revenue Next 2Y
Revenue Next 3Y
Revenue Next 5Y
EBIT growth 1Y
EBIT growth 3Y
EBIT growth 5Y
EBIT Next Year
EBIT Next 3Y
EBIT Next 5Y
FCF growth 1Y
FCF growth 3Y
FCF growth 5Y
OCF growth 1Y
OCF growth 3Y
OCF growth 5Y