GRUPO TELEVISA SA-SPON ADR (TV)
US40049J2069 - ADR
Overall TV gets a fundamental rating of 4 out of 10. We evaluated TV against 96 industry peers in the Media industry. TV scores quite bad on profitability, while its financial health is fine. Not spectacular, but in line with the averages. TV is valued quite cheap, but it does not seem to be growing.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year TV was profitable.
TV had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
In multiple years TV reported negative net income over the last 5 years.
In the past 5 years TV always reported a positive cash flow from operatings.
1.2 Ratios
TV has a worse Return On Assets (-2.65%) than 64.21% of its industry peers.
Looking at the Return On Equity, with a value of -5.97%, TV is in line with its industry, outperforming 42.11% of the companies in the same industry.
TV has a Return On Invested Capital of 1.08%. This is in the lower half of the industry: TV underperforms 66.32% of its industry peers.
TV had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 2.11%. This is significantly below the industry average of 7.92%.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | -2.65% | ||
| ROE | -5.97% | ||
| ROIC | 1.08% |
ROA(3y)4.6%
ROA(5y)2.99%
ROE(3y)11.75%
ROE(5y)7.73%
ROIC(3y)2.11%
ROIC(5y)3.64%
1.3 Margins
TV has a Operating Margin of 4.09%. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: TV outperforms 44.21% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of TV has declined.
Looking at the Gross Margin, with a value of 33.29%, TV is in line with its industry, outperforming 44.21% of the companies in the same industry.
TV's Gross Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 4.09% | ||
| PM (TTM) | N/A | ||
| GM | 33.29% |
OM growth 3Y-35.28%
OM growth 5Y-21.73%
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-7%
GM growth 5Y-4.91%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is below the Cost of Capital (WACC), so TV is destroying value.
The number of shares outstanding for TV has been reduced compared to 1 year ago.
TV has less shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
Compared to 1 year ago, TV has an improved debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
TV has an Altman-Z score of 1.20. This is a bad value and indicates that TV is not financially healthy and even has some risk of bankruptcy.
The Altman-Z score of TV (1.20) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
TV has a debt to FCF ratio of 17.56. This is a negative value and a sign of low solvency as TV would need 17.56 years to pay back of all of its debts.
TV's Debt to FCF ratio of 17.56 is in line compared to the rest of the industry. TV outperforms 50.53% of its industry peers.
TV has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.70. This is a neutral value indicating TV is somewhat dependend on debt financing.
Looking at the Debt to Equity ratio, with a value of 0.70, TV is in line with its industry, outperforming 46.32% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.7 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 17.56 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.2 |
ROIC/WACC0.12
WACC8.84%
2.3 Liquidity
TV has a Current Ratio of 1.59. This is a normal value and indicates that TV is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
TV has a Current ratio (1.59) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
TV has a Quick Ratio of 1.57. This is a normal value and indicates that TV is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
TV has a Quick ratio (1.57) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.59 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.57 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The Earnings Per Share has grown by an impressive 31.22% over the past year.
TV shows a decrease in Revenue. In the last year, the revenue decreased by -5.62%.
Measured over the past years, TV shows a decrease in Revenue. The Revenue has been decreasing by -6.14% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)31.22%
EPS 3YN/A
EPS 5YN/A
EPS growth Q2Q653.03%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-5.62%
Revenue growth 3Y-8.84%
Revenue growth 5Y-6.14%
Revenue growth Q2Q-12.68%
3.2 Future
The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 26.43% on average over the next years. This is a very strong growth
Based on estimates for the next years, TV will show a decrease in Revenue. The Revenue will decrease by -3.42% on average per year.
EPS Next Y178.23%
EPS Next 2Y93.88%
EPS Next 3Y64.48%
EPS Next 5Y26.43%
Revenue Next Year-10.79%
Revenue Next 2Y-5.64%
Revenue Next 3Y-4.66%
Revenue Next 5Y-3.42%
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
The Price/Earnings ratio is 8.95, which indicates a very decent valuation of TV.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Earnings ratio of TV indicates a rather cheap valuation: TV is cheaper than 91.58% of the companies listed in the same industry.
When comparing the Price/Earnings ratio of TV to the average of the S&P500 Index (28.15), we can say TV is valued rather cheaply.
With a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 10.73, the valuation of TV can be described as very reasonable.
71.58% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than TV, based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio.
TV is valuated rather cheaply when we compare the Price/Forward Earnings ratio to 20.20, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 8.95 | ||
| Fwd PE | 10.73 |
4.2 Price Multiples
TV's Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. TV is cheaper than 90.53% of the companies in the same industry.
TV's Price/Free Cash Flow ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. TV is cheaper than 89.47% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 5.78 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 3.69 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
A more expensive valuation may be justified as TV's earnings are expected to grow with 64.48% in the coming years.
PEG (NY)0.05
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y93.88%
EPS Next 3Y64.48%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 4.01%, TV is a good candidate for dividend investing.
TV's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the industry average which is at 4.24. TV pays more dividend than 89.47% of the companies in the same industry.
TV's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 2.34.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.01% |
5.2 History
The dividend of TV decreases each year by -2.95%.
TV has paid a dividend for at least 10 years, which is a reliable track record.
Dividend Growth(5Y)-2.95%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
TV has negative earnings and hence a negative payout ratio. The dividend may be in danger.
DP-15.37%
EPS Next 2Y93.88%
EPS Next 3Y64.48%
GRUPO TELEVISA SA-SPON ADR
NYSE:TV (5/17/2024, 7:04:00 PM)
After market: 3.31 0 (0%)3.31
+0.01 (+0.3%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorCommunication Services
GICS IndustryGroupMedia & Entertainment
GICS IndustryMedia
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners
Inst Owner Change
Ins Owners
Ins Owner Change
Market Cap1.83B
Analysts
Price Target
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.01% |
Dividend Growth(5Y)
DP
Div Incr Years
Div Non Decr Years
Ex-Date
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)
Avg EPS beat(2)
Min EPS beat(2)
Max EPS beat(2)
EPS beat(4)
Avg EPS beat(4)
Min EPS beat(4)
Max EPS beat(4)
EPS beat(8)
Avg EPS beat(8)
EPS beat(12)
Avg EPS beat(12)
EPS beat(16)
Avg EPS beat(16)
Revenue beat(2)
Avg Revenue beat(2)
Min Revenue beat(2)
Max Revenue beat(2)
Revenue beat(4)
Avg Revenue beat(4)
Min Revenue beat(4)
Max Revenue beat(4)
Revenue beat(8)
Avg Revenue beat(8)
Revenue beat(12)
Avg Revenue beat(12)
Revenue beat(16)
Avg Revenue beat(16)
PT rev (1m)
PT rev (3m)
EPS NQ rev (1m)
EPS NQ rev (3m)
EPS NY rev (1m)
EPS NY rev (3m)
Revenue NQ rev (1m)
Revenue NQ rev (3m)
Revenue NY rev (1m)
Revenue NY rev (3m)
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 8.95 | ||
| Fwd PE | 10.73 | ||
| P/S | |||
| P/FCF | |||
| P/OCF | |||
| P/B | |||
| P/tB | |||
| EV/EBITDA |
EPS(TTM)
EY
EPS(NY)
Fwd EY
FCF(TTM)
FCFY
OCF(TTM)
OCFY
SpS
BVpS
TBVpS
PEG (NY)0.05
PEG (5Y)N/A
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | -2.65% | ||
| ROE | -5.97% | ||
| ROCE | |||
| ROIC | |||
| ROICexc | |||
| ROICexgc | |||
| OM | 4.09% | ||
| PM (TTM) | N/A | ||
| GM | 33.29% | ||
| FCFM |
ROA(3y)
ROA(5y)
ROE(3y)
ROE(5y)
ROIC(3y)
ROIC(5y)
ROICexc(3y)
ROICexc(5y)
ROICexgc(3y)
ROICexgc(5y)
ROCE(3y)
ROCE(5y)
ROICexcg growth 3Y
ROICexcg growth 5Y
ROICexc growth 3Y
ROICexc growth 5Y
OM growth 3Y
OM growth 5Y
PM growth 3Y
PM growth 5Y
GM growth 3Y
GM growth 5Y
F-Score
Asset Turnover0.28
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.7 | ||
| Debt/FCF | |||
| Debt/EBITDA | |||
| Cap/Depr | |||
| Cap/Sales | |||
| Interest Coverage | |||
| Cash Conversion | |||
| Profit Quality | |||
| Current Ratio | 1.59 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.57 | ||
| Altman-Z |
F-Score
WACC
ROIC/WACC
Cap/Depr(3y)
Cap/Depr(5y)
Cap/Sales(3y)
Cap/Sales(5y)
Profit Quality(3y)
Profit Quality(5y)
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)31.22%
EPS 3YN/A
EPS 5Y
EPS growth Q2Q
EPS Next Y178.23%
EPS Next 2Y
EPS Next 3Y
EPS Next 5Y
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-5.62%
Revenue growth 3Y-8.84%
Revenue growth 5Y
Revenue growth Q2Q
Revenue Next Year
Revenue Next 2Y
Revenue Next 3Y
Revenue Next 5Y
EBIT growth 1Y
EBIT growth 3Y
EBIT growth 5Y
EBIT Next Year
EBIT Next 3Y
EBIT Next 5Y
FCF growth 1Y
FCF growth 3Y
FCF growth 5Y
OCF growth 1Y
OCF growth 3Y
OCF growth 5Y