TASEKO MINES LTD (TGB) Stock Fundamental Analysis
NYSEARCA:TGB - NYSE Arca - CA8765111064 - Common Stock - Currency: USD
Overall TGB gets a fundamental rating of 4 out of 10. We evaluated TGB against 155 industry peers in the Metals & Mining industry. TGB may be in some trouble as it scores bad on both profitability and health. A decent growth rate in combination with a cheap valuation! Better keep an eye on TGB.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year TGB was profitable.
TGB had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
The reported net income has been mixed in the past 5 years: TGB reported negative net income in multiple years.
TGB had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
TGB has a Return On Assets of -2.74%. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: TGB outperforms 43.87% of its industry peers.
TGB has a worse Return On Equity (-11.99%) than 65.16% of its industry peers.
TGB has a Return On Invested Capital (3.57%) which is in line with its industry peers.
The Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years for TGB is significantly below the industry average of 11.10%.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | -2.74% | ||
| ROE | -11.99% | ||
| ROIC | 3.57% |
ROA(3y)0.88%
ROA(5y)0.63%
ROE(3y)3.03%
ROE(5y)2.37%
ROIC(3y)4.61%
ROIC(5y)4.94%
1.3 Margins
Looking at the Operating Margin, with a value of 15.00%, TGB is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 69.68% of the companies in the same industry.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of TGB has declined.
The Gross Margin of TGB (19.44%) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
TGB's Gross Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 15% | ||
| PM (TTM) | N/A | ||
| GM | 19.44% |
OM growth 3Y-21.05%
OM growth 5YN/A
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-18.43%
GM growth 5YN/A
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
TGB has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is below the Cost of Capital (WACC), which means it is destroying value.
Compared to 1 year ago, TGB has more shares outstanding
TGB has more shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
TGB has a better debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
TGB has an Altman-Z score of 0.75. This is a bad value and indicates that TGB is not financially healthy and even has some risk of bankruptcy.
TGB has a Altman-Z score of 0.75. This is in the lower half of the industry: TGB underperforms 79.35% of its industry peers.
The Debt to FCF ratio of TGB is 4.65, which is a neutral value as it means it would take TGB, 4.65 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
TGB's Debt to FCF ratio of 4.65 is fine compared to the rest of the industry. TGB outperforms 68.39% of its industry peers.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 1.49 is on the high side and indicates that TGB has dependencies on debt financing.
Looking at the Debt to Equity ratio, with a value of 1.49, TGB is doing worse than 90.32% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.49 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 4.65 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.75 |
ROIC/WACC0.36
WACC9.83%
2.3 Liquidity
TGB has a Current Ratio of 1.08. This is a normal value and indicates that TGB is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
TGB's Current ratio of 1.08 is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. TGB is outperformed by 83.87% of its industry peers.
TGB has a Quick Ratio of 1.08. This is a bad value and indicates that TGB is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
Looking at the Quick ratio, with a value of 0.60, TGB is doing worse than 87.10% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.08 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.6 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The earnings per share for TGB have decreased strongly by -12.50% in the last year.
Measured over the past 5 years, TGB shows a small growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been growing by 3.78% on average per year.
TGB shows a small growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 7.90%.
Measured over the past years, TGB shows a quite strong growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 13.06% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-12.5%
EPS 3Y3.78%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%-166.67%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)7.9%
Revenue growth 3Y11.96%
Revenue growth 5Y13.06%
Sales Q2Q%-5.31%
3.2 Future
The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 43.58% on average over the next years. This is a very strong growth
The Revenue is expected to grow by 17.23% on average over the next years. This is quite good.
EPS Next Y38.65%
EPS Next 2Y67.6%
EPS Next 3Y63.06%
EPS Next 5Y43.58%
Revenue Next Year19.58%
Revenue Next 2Y27.59%
Revenue Next 3Y25.51%
Revenue Next 5Y17.23%
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
The Revenue growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
A Price/Earnings ratio of 28.75 indicates a quite expensive valuation of TGB.
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, TGB is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 65.81% of the companies are valued more expensively.
The average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio is at 26.55. TGB is around the same levels.
The Price/Forward Earnings ratio is 7.37, which indicates a rather cheap valuation of TGB.
86.45% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than TGB, based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio.
TGB is valuated cheaply when we compare the Price/Forward Earnings ratio to 22.40, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 28.75 | ||
| Fwd PE | 7.37 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, TGB is valued a bit cheaper than 63.87% of the companies in the same industry.
Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, TGB is valued cheaper than 92.90% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 7.28 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 11.23 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
TGB's earnings are expected to grow with 63.06% in the coming years. This may justify a more expensive valuation.
PEG (NY)0.74
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y67.6%
EPS Next 3Y63.06%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
No dividends for TGB!.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
NYSEARCA:TGB (6/12/2025, 9:47:58 AM)
2.875
-0.04 (-1.2%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorMaterials
GICS IndustryGroupMaterials
GICS IndustryMetals & Mining
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners28.61%
Inst Owner Change14.96%
Ins Owners2.7%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap908.15M
Analysts81.82
Price Target3.29 (14.43%)
Short Float %2.31%
Short Ratio0.54
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
Yearly DividendN/A
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
DPN/A
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)0
Avg Revenue beat(2)-3.08%
Min Revenue beat(2)-3.82%
Max Revenue beat(2)-2.34%
Revenue beat(4)1
Avg Revenue beat(4)-0.8%
Min Revenue beat(4)-3.82%
Max Revenue beat(4)5.11%
Revenue beat(8)3
Avg Revenue beat(8)-0.15%
Revenue beat(12)4
Avg Revenue beat(12)-1.54%
Revenue beat(16)4
Avg Revenue beat(16)-2.7%
PT rev (1m)-0.92%
PT rev (3m)5.81%
EPS NQ rev (1m)-54.55%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-58.33%
EPS NY rev (1m)0%
EPS NY rev (3m)-9.16%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)-0.81%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)0%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-2.31%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 28.75 | ||
| Fwd PE | 7.37 | ||
| P/S | 2.07 | ||
| P/FCF | 7.28 | ||
| P/OCF | 5.43 | ||
| P/B | 2.45 | ||
| P/tB | 2.47 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 11.23 |
EPS(TTM)0.1
EY3.48%
EPS(NY)0.39
Fwd EY13.56%
FCF(TTM)0.39
FCFY13.74%
OCF(TTM)0.53
OCFY18.42%
SpS1.39
BVpS1.18
TBVpS1.16
PEG (NY)0.74
PEG (5Y)N/A
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | -2.74% | ||
| ROE | -11.99% | ||
| ROCE | 4.53% | ||
| ROIC | 3.57% | ||
| ROICexc | 3.81% | ||
| ROICexgc | 3.82% | ||
| OM | 15% | ||
| PM (TTM) | N/A | ||
| GM | 19.44% | ||
| FCFM | 28.44% |
ROA(3y)0.88%
ROA(5y)0.63%
ROE(3y)3.03%
ROE(5y)2.37%
ROIC(3y)4.61%
ROIC(5y)4.94%
ROICexc(3y)5.02%
ROICexc(5y)5.79%
ROICexgc(3y)5.04%
ROICexgc(5y)5.82%
ROCE(3y)5.83%
ROCE(5y)6.25%
ROICexcg growth 3Y-31.69%
ROICexcg growth 5YN/A
ROICexc growth 3Y-31.63%
ROICexc growth 5YN/A
OM growth 3Y-21.05%
OM growth 5YN/A
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-18.43%
GM growth 5YN/A
F-Score3
Asset Turnover0.27
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.49 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 4.65 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 4.41 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 71.24% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 9.7% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 1.81 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 133.27% | ||
| Profit Quality | N/A | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.08 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.6 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.75 |
F-Score3
WACC9.83%
ROIC/WACC0.36
Cap/Depr(3y)155.58%
Cap/Depr(5y)128.33%
Cap/Sales(3y)19.52%
Cap/Sales(5y)18.79%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-12.5%
EPS 3Y3.78%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%-166.67%
EPS Next Y38.65%
EPS Next 2Y67.6%
EPS Next 3Y63.06%
EPS Next 5Y43.58%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)7.9%
Revenue growth 3Y11.96%
Revenue growth 5Y13.06%
Sales Q2Q%-5.31%
Revenue Next Year19.58%
Revenue Next 2Y27.59%
Revenue Next 3Y25.51%
Revenue Next 5Y17.23%
EBIT growth 1Y-26.98%
EBIT growth 3Y-11.61%
EBIT growth 5YN/A
EBIT Next Year152.27%
EBIT Next 3Y76.84%
EBIT Next 5Y45.31%
FCF growth 1Y300.13%
FCF growth 3Y20.05%
FCF growth 5YN/A
OCF growth 1Y298.14%
OCF growth 3Y9.99%
OCF growth 5Y40.43%