TASEKO MINES LTD (TGB) Stock Fundamental Analysis
NYSEARCA:TGB - NYSE Arca - CA8765111064 - Common Stock - Currency: USD
Overall TGB gets a fundamental rating of 4 out of 10. We evaluated TGB against 155 industry peers in the Metals & Mining industry. TGB may be in some trouble as it scores bad on both profitability and health. TGB is valued quite cheap, while showing a decent growth score. This is a good combination!
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
TGB had positive earnings in the past year.
In the past year TGB had a positive cash flow from operations.
In multiple years TGB reported negative net income over the last 5 years.
Each year in the past 5 years TGB had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
With a Return On Assets value of -2.74%, TGB perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 43.87% of the companies in the same industry.
Looking at the Return On Equity, with a value of -11.99%, TGB is doing worse than 65.16% of the companies in the same industry.
TGB has a Return On Invested Capital of 3.57%. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: TGB outperforms 59.35% of its industry peers.
Measured over the past 3 years, the Average Return On Invested Capital for TGB is significantly below the industry average of 11.10%.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | -2.74% | ||
| ROE | -11.99% | ||
| ROIC | 3.57% |
ROA(3y)0.88%
ROA(5y)0.63%
ROE(3y)3.03%
ROE(5y)2.37%
ROIC(3y)4.61%
ROIC(5y)4.94%
1.3 Margins
The Operating Margin of TGB (15.00%) is better than 69.68% of its industry peers.
TGB's Operating Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
TGB's Gross Margin of 19.44% is in line compared to the rest of the industry. TGB outperforms 56.13% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of TGB has declined.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 15% | ||
| PM (TTM) | N/A | ||
| GM | 19.44% |
OM growth 3Y-21.05%
OM growth 5YN/A
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-18.43%
GM growth 5YN/A
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is below the Cost of Capital (WACC), so TGB is destroying value.
Compared to 1 year ago, TGB has more shares outstanding
The number of shares outstanding for TGB has been increased compared to 5 years ago.
TGB has a better debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
TGB has an Altman-Z score of 0.78. This is a bad value and indicates that TGB is not financially healthy and even has some risk of bankruptcy.
TGB's Altman-Z score of 0.78 is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. TGB is outperformed by 80.00% of its industry peers.
TGB has a debt to FCF ratio of 4.65. This is a neutral value as TGB would need 4.65 years to pay back of all of its debts.
TGB has a better Debt to FCF ratio (4.65) than 68.39% of its industry peers.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 1.49 is on the high side and indicates that TGB has dependencies on debt financing.
TGB has a worse Debt to Equity ratio (1.49) than 90.32% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.49 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 4.65 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.78 |
ROIC/WACC0.37
WACC9.78%
2.3 Liquidity
TGB has a Current Ratio of 1.08. This is a normal value and indicates that TGB is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
TGB's Current ratio of 1.08 is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. TGB is outperformed by 83.87% of its industry peers.
TGB has a Quick Ratio of 1.08. This is a bad value and indicates that TGB is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
The Quick ratio of TGB (0.60) is worse than 87.10% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.08 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.6 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The earnings per share for TGB have decreased strongly by -12.50% in the last year.
TGB shows a small growth in Earnings Per Share. Measured over the last years, the EPS has been growing by 3.78% yearly.
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 7.90% in the past year.
The Revenue has been growing by 13.06% on average over the past years. This is quite good.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-12.5%
EPS 3Y3.78%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%-166.67%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)7.9%
Revenue growth 3Y11.96%
Revenue growth 5Y13.06%
Sales Q2Q%-5.31%
3.2 Future
The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 43.58% on average over the next years. This is a very strong growth
TGB is expected to show quite a strong growth in Revenue. In the coming years, the Revenue will grow by 17.23% yearly.
EPS Next Y38.65%
EPS Next 2Y67.6%
EPS Next 3Y63.06%
EPS Next 5Y43.58%
Revenue Next Year19.58%
Revenue Next 2Y27.59%
Revenue Next 3Y25.51%
Revenue Next 5Y17.23%
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
With a Price/Earnings ratio of 31.00, TGB can be considered very expensive at the moment.
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, TGB is valued a bit cheaper than 64.52% of the companies in the same industry.
The average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio is at 26.53. TGB is around the same levels.
TGB is valuated cheaply with a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 7.95.
TGB's Price/Forward Earnings ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. TGB is cheaper than 85.16% of the companies in the same industry.
TGB's Price/Forward Earnings ratio indicates a rather cheap valuation when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 22.27.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 31 | ||
| Fwd PE | 7.95 |
4.2 Price Multiples
63.23% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than TGB, based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio.
92.90% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than TGB, based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 7.85 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 11.7 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
TGB's low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
TGB's earnings are expected to grow with 63.06% in the coming years. This may justify a more expensive valuation.
PEG (NY)0.8
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y67.6%
EPS Next 3Y63.06%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
No dividends for TGB!.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
3.1
+0.04 (+1.31%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorMaterials
GICS IndustryGroupMaterials
GICS IndustryMetals & Mining
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners28.61%
Inst Owner Change14.96%
Ins Owners2.7%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap979.23M
Analysts81.82
Price Target3.29 (6.13%)
Short Float %2.31%
Short Ratio0.54
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
Yearly DividendN/A
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
DPN/A
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)0
Avg Revenue beat(2)-3.08%
Min Revenue beat(2)-3.82%
Max Revenue beat(2)-2.34%
Revenue beat(4)1
Avg Revenue beat(4)-0.8%
Min Revenue beat(4)-3.82%
Max Revenue beat(4)5.11%
Revenue beat(8)3
Avg Revenue beat(8)-0.15%
Revenue beat(12)4
Avg Revenue beat(12)-1.54%
Revenue beat(16)4
Avg Revenue beat(16)-2.7%
PT rev (1m)-0.92%
PT rev (3m)5.81%
EPS NQ rev (1m)-54.55%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-58.33%
EPS NY rev (1m)0%
EPS NY rev (3m)-9.16%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)-0.81%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)0%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-2.31%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 31 | ||
| Fwd PE | 7.95 | ||
| P/S | 2.23 | ||
| P/FCF | 7.85 | ||
| P/OCF | 5.85 | ||
| P/B | 2.64 | ||
| P/tB | 2.67 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 11.7 |
EPS(TTM)0.1
EY3.23%
EPS(NY)0.39
Fwd EY12.58%
FCF(TTM)0.39
FCFY12.74%
OCF(TTM)0.53
OCFY17.08%
SpS1.39
BVpS1.18
TBVpS1.16
PEG (NY)0.8
PEG (5Y)N/A
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | -2.74% | ||
| ROE | -11.99% | ||
| ROCE | 4.53% | ||
| ROIC | 3.57% | ||
| ROICexc | 3.81% | ||
| ROICexgc | 3.82% | ||
| OM | 15% | ||
| PM (TTM) | N/A | ||
| GM | 19.44% | ||
| FCFM | 28.44% |
ROA(3y)0.88%
ROA(5y)0.63%
ROE(3y)3.03%
ROE(5y)2.37%
ROIC(3y)4.61%
ROIC(5y)4.94%
ROICexc(3y)5.02%
ROICexc(5y)5.79%
ROICexgc(3y)5.04%
ROICexgc(5y)5.82%
ROCE(3y)5.83%
ROCE(5y)6.25%
ROICexcg growth 3Y-31.69%
ROICexcg growth 5YN/A
ROICexc growth 3Y-31.63%
ROICexc growth 5YN/A
OM growth 3Y-21.05%
OM growth 5YN/A
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-18.43%
GM growth 5YN/A
F-Score3
Asset Turnover0.27
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.49 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 4.65 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 4.41 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 71.24% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 9.7% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 1.81 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 133.27% | ||
| Profit Quality | N/A | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.08 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.6 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.78 |
F-Score3
WACC9.78%
ROIC/WACC0.37
Cap/Depr(3y)155.58%
Cap/Depr(5y)128.33%
Cap/Sales(3y)19.52%
Cap/Sales(5y)18.79%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-12.5%
EPS 3Y3.78%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%-166.67%
EPS Next Y38.65%
EPS Next 2Y67.6%
EPS Next 3Y63.06%
EPS Next 5Y43.58%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)7.9%
Revenue growth 3Y11.96%
Revenue growth 5Y13.06%
Sales Q2Q%-5.31%
Revenue Next Year19.58%
Revenue Next 2Y27.59%
Revenue Next 3Y25.51%
Revenue Next 5Y17.23%
EBIT growth 1Y-26.98%
EBIT growth 3Y-11.61%
EBIT growth 5YN/A
EBIT Next Year152.27%
EBIT Next 3Y76.84%
EBIT Next 5Y45.31%
FCF growth 1Y300.13%
FCF growth 3Y20.05%
FCF growth 5YN/A
OCF growth 1Y298.14%
OCF growth 3Y9.99%
OCF growth 5Y40.43%