MICHELIN (CGDE) (ML.PA) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - Euronext Paris - EPA:ML - FR001400AJ45 - Common Stock
28.09 EUR
+0.06 (+0.21%)
Taking everything into account, ML scores 6 out of 10 in our fundamental rating. ML was compared to 29 industry peers in the Automobile Components industry. ML gets an excellent profitability rating and is at the same time showing great financial health properties. ML is not valued too expensively and it also shows a decent growth rate. Finally ML also has an excellent dividend rating. This makes ML very considerable for dividend investing!
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year ML was profitable.
In the past year ML had a positive cash flow from operations.
ML had positive earnings in each of the past 5 years.
Each year in the past 5 years ML had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
ML has a Return On Assets of 4.39%. This is amongst the best in the industry. ML outperforms 89.66% of its industry peers.
ML has a Return On Equity of 8.81%. This is amongst the best in the industry. ML outperforms 82.76% of its industry peers.
With an excellent Return On Invested Capital value of 8.17%, ML belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming 82.76% of the companies in the same industry.
The Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years for ML is above the industry average of 6.47%.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 4.39% | ||
| ROE | 8.81% | ||
| ROIC | 8.17% |
ROA(3y)5.45%
ROA(5y)4.73%
ROE(3y)10.95%
ROE(5y)10.02%
ROIC(3y)9.25%
ROIC(5y)8.5%
1.3 Margins
ML has a better Profit Margin (5.84%) than 96.55% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of ML has remained more or less at the same level.
The Operating Margin of ML (10.65%) is better than 96.55% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of ML has remained more or less at the same level.
The Gross Margin of ML (27.60%) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
ML's Gross Margin has been stable in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 10.65% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 5.84% | ||
| GM | 27.6% |
OM growth 3Y-2.46%
OM growth 5Y-1.24%
PM growth 3Y-3.58%
PM growth 5Y-0.79%
GM growth 3Y-0.99%
GM growth 5Y-0.59%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) just above the Cost of Capital (WACC), ML is creating some value.
The number of shares outstanding for ML has been reduced compared to 1 year ago.
The number of shares outstanding for ML has been reduced compared to 5 years ago.
Compared to 1 year ago, ML has a worse debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
An Altman-Z score of 2.54 indicates that ML is not a great score, but indicates only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
ML's Altman-Z score of 2.54 is amongst the best of the industry. ML outperforms 82.76% of its industry peers.
The Debt to FCF ratio of ML is 6.05, which is on the high side as it means it would take ML, 6.05 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
With a decent Debt to FCF ratio value of 6.05, ML is doing good in the industry, outperforming 79.31% of the companies in the same industry.
ML has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.32. This is a healthy value indicating a solid balance between debt and equity.
ML has a Debt to Equity ratio of 0.32. This is amongst the best in the industry. ML outperforms 86.21% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.32 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 6.05 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.54 |
ROIC/WACC1.21
WACC6.76%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 1.80 indicates that ML should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
The Current ratio of ML (1.80) is better than 89.66% of its industry peers.
A Quick Ratio of 1.12 indicates that ML should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
ML's Quick ratio of 1.12 is amongst the best of the industry. ML outperforms 82.76% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.8 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.12 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
ML shows a strong negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year the EPS decreased by -18.28%.
Measured over the past 5 years, ML shows a small growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been growing by 1.64% on average per year.
Looking at the last year, ML shows a decrease in Revenue. The Revenue has decreased by -3.62% in the last year.
Measured over the past years, ML shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 2.41% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-18.28%
EPS 3Y0.78%
EPS 5Y1.64%
EPS Q2Q%-26.88%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-3.62%
Revenue growth 3Y4.55%
Revenue growth 5Y2.41%
Sales Q2Q%-3.36%
3.2 Future
The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 11.17% on average over the next years. This is quite good.
The Revenue is expected to grow by 3.23% on average over the next years.
EPS Next Y0.52%
EPS Next 2Y8.73%
EPS Next 3Y11.17%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year-4.91%
Revenue Next 2Y-1.32%
Revenue Next 3Y0.38%
Revenue Next 5Y3.23%
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
The Revenue growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
ML is valuated correctly with a Price/Earnings ratio of 12.83.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Earnings ratio of ML indicates a somewhat cheap valuation: ML is cheaper than 62.07% of the companies listed in the same industry.
ML's Price/Earnings ratio indicates a rather cheap valuation when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 26.49.
A Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 9.07 indicates a reasonable valuation of ML.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, ML is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 62.07% of the companies are valued more expensively.
When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of ML to the average of the S&P500 Index (23.69), we can say ML is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 12.83 | ||
| Fwd PE | 9.07 |
4.2 Price Multiples
ML's Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio is in line with the industry average.
The rest of the industry has a similar Price/Free Cash Flow ratio as ML.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 16.1 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 4.86 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The high PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates ML does not grow enough to justify the current Price/Earnings ratio.
ML has an outstanding profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)24.9
PEG (5Y)7.81
EPS Next 2Y8.73%
EPS Next 3Y11.17%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
ML has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 4.93%, which is a nice return.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 4.82, ML pays a better dividend. On top of this ML pays more dividend than 86.21% of the companies listed in the same industry.
ML's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 2.31.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.93% |
5.2 History
The dividend of ML is nicely growing with an annual growth rate of 7.84%!
Dividend Growth(5Y)7.84%
Div Incr Years5
Div Non Decr Years5
5.3 Sustainability
62.40% of the earnings are spent on dividend by ML. This is not a sustainable payout ratio.
ML's earnings are growing more than its dividend. This makes the dividend growth sustainable.
DP62.4%
EPS Next 2Y8.73%
EPS Next 3Y11.17%
EPA:ML (12/8/2025, 10:37:24 AM)
28.09
+0.06 (+0.21%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryGroupAutomobiles & Components
GICS IndustryAutomobile Components
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners46.46%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners0%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap19.96B
Revenue(TTM)26.74B
Net Income(TTM)1.56B
Analysts78.33
Price Target32.34 (15.13%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.93% |
Yearly Dividend1.35
Dividend Growth(5Y)7.84%
DP62.4%
Div Incr Years5
Div Non Decr Years5
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)0.05%
PT rev (3m)-14.53%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)-0.22%
EPS NY rev (3m)-18.12%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)-0.05%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-3.33%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 12.83 | ||
| Fwd PE | 9.07 | ||
| P/S | 0.75 | ||
| P/FCF | 16.1 | ||
| P/OCF | 5.9 | ||
| P/B | 1.13 | ||
| P/tB | 1.53 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 4.86 |
EPS(TTM)2.19
EY7.8%
EPS(NY)3.1
Fwd EY11.03%
FCF(TTM)1.75
FCFY6.21%
OCF(TTM)4.76
OCFY16.95%
SpS37.63
BVpS24.94
TBVpS18.36
PEG (NY)24.9
PEG (5Y)7.81
Graham Number35.06
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 4.39% | ||
| ROE | 8.81% | ||
| ROCE | 10.41% | ||
| ROIC | 8.17% | ||
| ROICexc | 9.37% | ||
| ROICexgc | 11.66% | ||
| OM | 10.65% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 5.84% | ||
| GM | 27.6% | ||
| FCFM | 4.64% |
ROA(3y)5.45%
ROA(5y)4.73%
ROE(3y)10.95%
ROE(5y)10.02%
ROIC(3y)9.25%
ROIC(5y)8.5%
ROICexc(3y)10.45%
ROICexc(5y)9.86%
ROICexgc(3y)12.91%
ROICexgc(5y)12.2%
ROCE(3y)11.87%
ROCE(5y)10.97%
ROICexgc growth 3Y-1.17%
ROICexgc growth 5Y0.57%
ROICexc growth 3Y-1.78%
ROICexc growth 5Y0.45%
OM growth 3Y-2.46%
OM growth 5Y-1.24%
PM growth 3Y-3.58%
PM growth 5Y-0.79%
GM growth 3Y-0.99%
GM growth 5Y-0.59%
F-Score5
Asset Turnover0.75
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.32 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 6.05 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 1.17 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 107.96% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 8.01% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 9.96 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 70% | ||
| Profit Quality | 79.44% | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.8 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.12 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.54 |
F-Score5
WACC6.76%
ROIC/WACC1.21
Cap/Depr(3y)113.8%
Cap/Depr(5y)101.88%
Cap/Sales(3y)7.8%
Cap/Sales(5y)7.31%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-18.28%
EPS 3Y0.78%
EPS 5Y1.64%
EPS Q2Q%-26.88%
EPS Next Y0.52%
EPS Next 2Y8.73%
EPS Next 3Y11.17%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-3.62%
Revenue growth 3Y4.55%
Revenue growth 5Y2.41%
Sales Q2Q%-3.36%
Revenue Next Year-4.91%
Revenue Next 2Y-1.32%
Revenue Next 3Y0.38%
Revenue Next 5Y3.23%
EBIT growth 1Y-17.5%
EBIT growth 3Y1.98%
EBIT growth 5Y1.14%
EBIT Next Year41.54%
EBIT Next 3Y18.8%
EBIT Next 5Y16.72%
FCF growth 1Y-20.46%
FCF growth 3Y21.5%
FCF growth 5Y7.22%
OCF growth 1Y-10.1%
OCF growth 3Y14.27%
OCF growth 5Y5.48%
MICHELIN (CGDE) / ML.PA FAQ
What is the ChartMill fundamental rating of MICHELIN (CGDE) (ML.PA) stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 6 / 10 to ML.PA.
What is the valuation status for ML stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 5 / 10 to MICHELIN (CGDE) (ML.PA). This can be considered as Fairly Valued.
How profitable is MICHELIN (CGDE) (ML.PA) stock?
MICHELIN (CGDE) (ML.PA) has a profitability rating of 8 / 10.
What is the financial health of MICHELIN (CGDE) (ML.PA) stock?
The financial health rating of MICHELIN (CGDE) (ML.PA) is 7 / 10.
Is the dividend of MICHELIN (CGDE) sustainable?
The dividend rating of MICHELIN (CGDE) (ML.PA) is 8 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 62.4%.