DARLING INGREDIENTS INC (DAR)
US2372661015 - Common Stock
Taking everything into account, DAR scores 4 out of 10 in our fundamental rating. DAR was compared to 90 industry peers in the Food Products industry. DAR has a medium profitability rating, but doesn't score so well on its financial health evaluation. DAR has a valuation in line with the averages, but on the other hand it scores bad on growth.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
DAR had positive earnings in the past year.
DAR had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
In the past 5 years DAR has always been profitable.
Each year in the past 5 years DAR had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
DAR has a Return On Assets (3.48%) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
With a Return On Equity value of 8.28%, DAR perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 55.56% of the companies in the same industry.
With a Return On Invested Capital value of 3.61%, DAR perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 46.67% of the companies in the same industry.
DAR had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 7.15%. This is in line with the industry average of 9.00%.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 3.48% | ||
| ROE | 8.28% | ||
| ROIC | 3.61% |
ROA(3y)8.16%
ROA(5y)7.12%
ROE(3y)17.76%
ROE(5y)15.14%
ROIC(3y)7.15%
ROIC(5y)5.19%
1.3 Margins
DAR has a Profit Margin of 6.04%. This is in the better half of the industry: DAR outperforms 72.22% of its industry peers.
DAR's Profit Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
With a decent Operating Margin value of 6.51%, DAR is doing good in the industry, outperforming 65.56% of the companies in the same industry.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of DAR has grown nicely.
DAR's Gross Margin of 23.77% is in line compared to the rest of the industry. DAR outperforms 60.00% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of DAR has grown nicely.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 6.51% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 6.04% | ||
| GM | 23.77% |
OM growth 3Y25.8%
OM growth 5Y21.47%
PM growth 3Y4.72%
PM growth 5Y26.07%
GM growth 3Y-0.64%
GM growth 5Y2.08%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
DAR has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is below the Cost of Capital (WACC), which means it is destroying value.
DAR has less shares outstanding than it did 1 year ago.
DAR has less shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
Compared to 1 year ago, DAR has a worse debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
An Altman-Z score of 1.85 indicates that DAR is not a great score, but indicates only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
DAR has a Altman-Z score (1.85) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
DAR has a debt to FCF ratio of 11.27. This is a negative value and a sign of low solvency as DAR would need 11.27 years to pay back of all of its debts.
Looking at the Debt to FCF ratio, with a value of 11.27, DAR is in line with its industry, outperforming 52.22% of the companies in the same industry.
DAR has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.97. This is a neutral value indicating DAR is somewhat dependend on debt financing.
With a Debt to Equity ratio value of 0.97, DAR is not doing good in the industry: 72.22% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.97 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 11.27 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.85 |
ROIC/WACC0.48
WACC7.59%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 1.57 indicates that DAR should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
DAR has a Current ratio (1.57) which is in line with its industry peers.
DAR has a Quick Ratio of 1.57. This is a bad value and indicates that DAR is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
DAR has a Quick ratio of 0.91. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: DAR outperforms 52.22% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.57 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.91 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The earnings per share for DAR have decreased strongly by -52.30% in the last year.
The Earnings Per Share has been growing by 50.52% on average over the past years. This is a very strong growth
DAR shows a very negative growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has decreased by -13.44%.
Measured over the past years, DAR shows a quite strong growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 14.91% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-52.3%
EPS 3Y26.21%
EPS 5Y50.52%
EPS Q2Q%-67.55%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-13.44%
Revenue growth 3Y23.87%
Revenue growth 5Y14.91%
Sales Q2Q%-17.2%
3.2 Future
The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 9.35% on average over the next years. This is quite good.
DAR is expected to show a decrease in Revenue. In the coming years, the Revenue will decrease by -1.91% yearly.
EPS Next Y-36.06%
EPS Next 2Y-3.92%
EPS Next 3Y4.09%
EPS Next 5Y9.35%
Revenue Next Year-12.79%
Revenue Next 2Y-3.94%
Revenue Next 3Y-1.91%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
The Revenue growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
With a Price/Earnings ratio of 16.22, DAR is valued correctly.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Earnings ratio of DAR indicates a somewhat cheap valuation: DAR is cheaper than 75.56% of the companies listed in the same industry.
DAR's Price/Earnings ratio indicates a valuation a bit cheaper than the S&P500 average which is at 31.52.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 10.17, the valuation of DAR can be described as reasonable.
DAR's Price/Forward Earnings ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. DAR is cheaper than 92.22% of the companies in the same industry.
DAR is valuated cheaply when we compare the Price/Forward Earnings ratio to 22.55, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 16.22 | ||
| Fwd PE | 10.17 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, DAR is valued a bit cheaper than 66.67% of the companies in the same industry.
71.11% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than DAR, based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 15.04 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 11.12 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The decent profitability rating of DAR may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)0.32
EPS Next 2Y-3.92%
EPS Next 3Y4.09%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
No dividends for DAR!.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
DARLING INGREDIENTS INC
NYSE:DAR (10/11/2024, 8:04:00 PM)
After market: 36.98 0 (0%)36.98
+0.96 (+2.67%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryGroupFood, Beverage & Tobacco
GICS IndustryFood Products
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners
Inst Owner Change
Ins Owners
Ins Owner Change
Market Cap5.88B
Analysts
Price Target
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
Dividend Growth(5Y)
DP
Div Incr Years
Div Non Decr Years
Ex-Date
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)
Avg EPS beat(2)
Min EPS beat(2)
Max EPS beat(2)
EPS beat(4)
Avg EPS beat(4)
Min EPS beat(4)
Max EPS beat(4)
EPS beat(8)
Avg EPS beat(8)
EPS beat(12)
Avg EPS beat(12)
EPS beat(16)
Avg EPS beat(16)
Revenue beat(2)
Avg Revenue beat(2)
Min Revenue beat(2)
Max Revenue beat(2)
Revenue beat(4)
Avg Revenue beat(4)
Min Revenue beat(4)
Max Revenue beat(4)
Revenue beat(8)
Avg Revenue beat(8)
Revenue beat(12)
Avg Revenue beat(12)
Revenue beat(16)
Avg Revenue beat(16)
PT rev (1m)
PT rev (3m)
EPS NQ rev (1m)
EPS NQ rev (3m)
EPS NY rev (1m)
EPS NY rev (3m)
Revenue NQ rev (1m)
Revenue NQ rev (3m)
Revenue NY rev (1m)
Revenue NY rev (3m)
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 16.22 | ||
| Fwd PE | 10.17 | ||
| P/S | |||
| P/FCF | |||
| P/OCF | |||
| P/B | |||
| P/tB | |||
| EV/EBITDA |
EPS(TTM)
EY
EPS(NY)
Fwd EY
FCF(TTM)
FCFY
OCF(TTM)
OCFY
SpS
BVpS
TBVpS
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)0.32
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 3.48% | ||
| ROE | 8.28% | ||
| ROCE | |||
| ROIC | |||
| ROICexc | |||
| ROICexgc | |||
| OM | 6.51% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 6.04% | ||
| GM | 23.77% | ||
| FCFM |
ROA(3y)
ROA(5y)
ROE(3y)
ROE(5y)
ROIC(3y)
ROIC(5y)
ROICexc(3y)
ROICexc(5y)
ROICexgc(3y)
ROICexgc(5y)
ROCE(3y)
ROCE(5y)
ROICexcg growth 3Y
ROICexcg growth 5Y
ROICexc growth 3Y
ROICexc growth 5Y
OM growth 3Y
OM growth 5Y
PM growth 3Y
PM growth 5Y
GM growth 3Y
GM growth 5Y
F-Score
Asset Turnover0.58
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.97 | ||
| Debt/FCF | |||
| Debt/EBITDA | |||
| Cap/Depr | |||
| Cap/Sales | |||
| Interest Coverage | |||
| Cash Conversion | |||
| Profit Quality | |||
| Current Ratio | 1.57 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.91 | ||
| Altman-Z |
F-Score
WACC
ROIC/WACC
Cap/Depr(3y)
Cap/Depr(5y)
Cap/Sales(3y)
Cap/Sales(5y)
Profit Quality(3y)
Profit Quality(5y)
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-52.3%
EPS 3Y26.21%
EPS 5Y
EPS Q2Q%
EPS Next Y-36.06%
EPS Next 2Y
EPS Next 3Y
EPS Next 5Y
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-13.44%
Revenue growth 3Y23.87%
Revenue growth 5Y
Sales Q2Q%
Revenue Next Year
Revenue Next 2Y
Revenue Next 3Y
Revenue Next 5Y
EBIT growth 1Y
EBIT growth 3Y
EBIT growth 5Y
EBIT Next Year
EBIT Next 3Y
EBIT Next 5Y
FCF growth 1Y
FCF growth 3Y
FCF growth 5Y
OCF growth 1Y
OCF growth 3Y
OCF growth 5Y