KINGSOFT CLOUD HOLDINGS-ADR (KC)
US49639K1016 - ADR
KC gets a fundamental rating of 2 out of 10. The analysis compared the fundamentals against 85 industry peers in the IT Services industry. KC may be in some trouble as it scores bad on both profitability and health. KC is valied quite expensively at the moment, while it does show a decent growth rate.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year KC has reported negative net income.
KC had a negative operating cash flow in the past year.
KC had negative earnings in each of the past 5 years.
KC had negative operating cash flow in 4 of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
KC has a worse Return On Assets (-14.44%) than 77.38% of its industry peers.
KC has a Return On Equity of -31.59%. This is in the lower half of the industry: KC underperforms 67.86% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | -14.44% | ||
| ROE | -31.59% | ||
| ROIC | N/A |
ROA(3y)-12.44%
ROA(5y)-12.96%
ROE(3y)-25.59%
ROE(5y)-24.3%
ROIC(3y)N/A
ROIC(5y)N/A
1.3 Margins
KC has a Gross Margin of 12.06%. This is amonst the worse of the industry: KC underperforms 94.05% of its industry peers.
KC's Gross Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
The Profit Margin and Operating Margin are not available for KC so they could not be analyzed.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | N/A | ||
| PM (TTM) | N/A | ||
| GM | 12.06% |
OM growth 3YN/A
OM growth 5YN/A
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y30.5%
GM growth 5YN/A
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
KC does not have a ROIC to compare to the WACC, probably because it is not profitable.
The number of shares outstanding for KC has been increased compared to 1 year ago.
Compared to 5 years ago, KC has more shares outstanding
Compared to 1 year ago, KC has a worse debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
Based on the Altman-Z score of -0.60, we must say that KC is in the distress zone and has some risk of bankruptcy.
KC has a Altman-Z score of -0.60. This is amonst the worse of the industry: KC underperforms 80.95% of its industry peers.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 0.23 indicates that KC is not too dependend on debt financing.
The Debt to Equity ratio of KC (0.23) is better than 64.29% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.23 | ||
| Debt/FCF | N/A | ||
| Altman-Z | -0.6 |
ROIC/WACCN/A
WACC8.89%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 0.89 indicates that KC may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
KC has a worse Current ratio (0.89) than 80.95% of its industry peers.
KC has a Quick Ratio of 0.89. This is a bad value and indicates that KC is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
With a Quick ratio value of 0.89, KC is not doing good in the industry: 78.57% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.89 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.89 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The Earnings Per Share has grown by an impressive 30.99% over the past year.
The Revenue for KC has decreased by -13.85% in the past year. This is quite bad
KC shows a strong growth in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been growing by 26.01% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)30.99%
EPS 3YN/A
EPS 5YN/A
EPS growth Q2Q53.95%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-13.85%
Revenue growth 3Y2.33%
Revenue growth 5Y26.01%
Revenue growth Q2Q-19.17%
3.2 Future
Based on estimates for the next years, KC will show a quite strong growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will grow by 18.28% on average per year.
The Revenue is expected to grow by 23.01% on average over the next years. This is a very strong growth
EPS Next Y21.66%
EPS Next 2Y22.17%
EPS Next 3Y18.28%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year7.03%
Revenue Next 2Y8.86%
Revenue Next 3Y8.08%
Revenue Next 5Y23.01%
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is stable.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
KC reported negative earnings for the last year, which makes the Price/Earnings Ratio negative.
Also next year KC is expected to report negative earnings again, which makes the also the Forward Price/Earnings Ratio negative.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | N/A | ||
| Fwd PE | N/A |
4.2 Price Multiples
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | N/A |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
KC's earnings are expected to grow with 18.28% in the coming years. This may justify a more expensive valuation.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y22.17%
EPS Next 3Y18.28%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
No dividends for KC!.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
KINGSOFT CLOUD HOLDINGS-ADR
NASDAQ:KC (5/17/2024, 7:09:14 PM)
After market: 3.59 -0.01 (-0.28%)3.6
+0.04 (+1.12%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorInformation Technology
GICS IndustryGroupSoftware & Services
GICS IndustryIT Services
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners
Inst Owner Change
Ins Owners
Ins Owner Change
Market Cap854.90M
Analysts
Price Target
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
Dividend Growth(5Y)
DP
Div Incr Years
Div Non Decr Years
Ex-Date
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)
Avg EPS beat(2)
Min EPS beat(2)
Max EPS beat(2)
EPS beat(4)
Avg EPS beat(4)
Min EPS beat(4)
Max EPS beat(4)
EPS beat(8)
Avg EPS beat(8)
EPS beat(12)
Avg EPS beat(12)
EPS beat(16)
Avg EPS beat(16)
Revenue beat(2)
Avg Revenue beat(2)
Min Revenue beat(2)
Max Revenue beat(2)
Revenue beat(4)
Avg Revenue beat(4)
Min Revenue beat(4)
Max Revenue beat(4)
Revenue beat(8)
Avg Revenue beat(8)
Revenue beat(12)
Avg Revenue beat(12)
Revenue beat(16)
Avg Revenue beat(16)
PT rev (1m)
PT rev (3m)
EPS NQ rev (1m)
EPS NQ rev (3m)
EPS NY rev (1m)
EPS NY rev (3m)
Revenue NQ rev (1m)
Revenue NQ rev (3m)
Revenue NY rev (1m)
Revenue NY rev (3m)
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | N/A | ||
| Fwd PE | N/A | ||
| P/S | |||
| P/FCF | |||
| P/OCF | |||
| P/B | |||
| P/tB | |||
| EV/EBITDA |
EPS(TTM)
EY
EPS(NY)
Fwd EY
FCF(TTM)
FCFY
OCF(TTM)
OCFY
SpS
BVpS
TBVpS
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | -14.44% | ||
| ROE | -31.59% | ||
| ROCE | |||
| ROIC | |||
| ROICexc | |||
| ROICexgc | |||
| OM | N/A | ||
| PM (TTM) | N/A | ||
| GM | 12.06% | ||
| FCFM |
ROA(3y)
ROA(5y)
ROE(3y)
ROE(5y)
ROIC(3y)
ROIC(5y)
ROICexc(3y)
ROICexc(5y)
ROICexgc(3y)
ROICexgc(5y)
ROCE(3y)
ROCE(5y)
ROICexcg growth 3Y
ROICexcg growth 5Y
ROICexc growth 3Y
ROICexc growth 5Y
OM growth 3Y
OM growth 5Y
PM growth 3Y
PM growth 5Y
GM growth 3Y
GM growth 5Y
F-Score
Asset Turnover0.47
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.23 | ||
| Debt/FCF | |||
| Debt/EBITDA | |||
| Cap/Depr | |||
| Cap/Sales | |||
| Interest Coverage | |||
| Cash Conversion | |||
| Profit Quality | |||
| Current Ratio | 0.89 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.89 | ||
| Altman-Z |
F-Score
WACC
ROIC/WACC
Cap/Depr(3y)
Cap/Depr(5y)
Cap/Sales(3y)
Cap/Sales(5y)
Profit Quality(3y)
Profit Quality(5y)
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)30.99%
EPS 3YN/A
EPS 5Y
EPS growth Q2Q
EPS Next Y21.66%
EPS Next 2Y
EPS Next 3Y
EPS Next 5Y
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-13.85%
Revenue growth 3Y2.33%
Revenue growth 5Y
Revenue growth Q2Q
Revenue Next Year
Revenue Next 2Y
Revenue Next 3Y
Revenue Next 5Y
EBIT growth 1Y
EBIT growth 3Y
EBIT growth 5Y
EBIT Next Year
EBIT Next 3Y
EBIT Next 5Y
FCF growth 1Y
FCF growth 3Y
FCF growth 5Y
OCF growth 1Y
OCF growth 3Y
OCF growth 5Y