SWISS WATER DECAFFEINATED CO (SWP.CA) Stock Fundamental Analysis
TSX:SWP - Toronto Stock Exchange - CA8710031094 - Common Stock - Currency: CAD
Overall SWP gets a fundamental rating of 3 out of 10. We evaluated SWP against 13 industry peers in the Food Products industry. SWP may be in some trouble as it scores bad on both profitability and health. SWP is valied quite expensively at the moment, while it does show a decent growth rate.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
SWP had positive earnings in the past year.
In the past year SWP has reported a negative cash flow from operations.
SWP had positive earnings in 4 of the past 5 years.
In multiple years SWP reported negative operating cash flow during the last 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
With a Return On Assets value of 1.21%, SWP is not doing good in the industry: 61.54% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
With a Return On Equity value of 4.82%, SWP is not doing good in the industry: 61.54% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
With a Return On Invested Capital value of 5.69%, SWP is not doing good in the industry: 69.23% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
SWP had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 2.76%. This is significantly below the industry average of 107.24%.
The 3 year average ROIC (2.76%) for SWP is below the current ROIC(5.69%), indicating increased profibility in the last year.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.21% | ||
| ROE | 4.82% | ||
| ROIC | 5.69% |
ROA(3y)0.47%
ROA(5y)0.76%
ROE(3y)1.91%
ROE(5y)2.42%
ROIC(3y)2.76%
ROIC(5y)2.33%
1.3 Margins
With a Profit Margin value of 1.36%, SWP is not doing good in the industry: 61.54% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
SWP's Profit Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
The Operating Margin of SWP (6.91%) is better than 76.92% of its industry peers.
SWP's Operating Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
Looking at the Gross Margin, with a value of 14.42%, SWP is doing worse than 69.23% of the companies in the same industry.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of SWP has declined.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 6.91% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 1.36% | ||
| GM | 14.42% |
OM growth 3Y21.99%
OM growth 5Y7.12%
PM growth 3Y22.4%
PM growth 5Y-24.48%
GM growth 3Y2.45%
GM growth 5Y-2.28%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
SWP has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is just above the Cost of Capital (WACC), which means it is creating some value.
The number of shares outstanding for SWP has been increased compared to 1 year ago.
Compared to 5 years ago, SWP has more shares outstanding
SWP has a better debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
SWP has an Altman-Z score of 1.33. This is a bad value and indicates that SWP is not financially healthy and even has some risk of bankruptcy.
SWP has a Altman-Z score of 1.33. This is in the lower half of the industry: SWP underperforms 76.92% of its industry peers.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 1.18 is on the high side and indicates that SWP has dependencies on debt financing.
Looking at the Debt to Equity ratio, with a value of 1.18, SWP is in line with its industry, outperforming 53.85% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.18 | ||
| Debt/FCF | N/A | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.33 |
ROIC/WACC1.23
WACC4.62%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 1.03 indicates that SWP should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
SWP's Current ratio of 1.03 is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. SWP is outperformed by 69.23% of its industry peers.
A Quick Ratio of 0.38 indicates that SWP may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
SWP has a Quick ratio (0.38) which is in line with its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.03 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.38 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
SWP shows a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has been growing by 415.37%, which is quite impressive.
SWP shows a very negative growth in Earnings Per Share. Measured over the last years, the EPS has been decreasing by -15.93% yearly.
The Revenue has grown by 26.10% in the past year. This is a very strong growth!
The Revenue has been growing by 12.24% on average over the past years. This is quite good.
EPS 1Y (TTM)415.37%
EPS 3Y39.04%
EPS 5Y-15.93%
EPS Q2Q%155.02%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)26.1%
Revenue growth 3Y11.44%
Revenue growth 5Y12.24%
Sales Q2Q%60.78%
3.2 Future
No EPS estimates are available, so we could not analyze the future EPS growth and evolution.
No Revenue estimates are available, so we could not analyze the future revenue growth and evolution.
EPS Next Y296.12%
EPS Next 2YN/A
EPS Next 3YN/A
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year6.29%
Revenue Next 2YN/A
Revenue Next 3YN/A
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
No EPS estimates are available, so we could not analyze the future EPS growth and evolution.
No Revenue estimates are available, so we could not analyze the future revenue growth and evolution.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
A Price/Earnings ratio of 30.07 indicates a quite expensive valuation of SWP.
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, SWP is valued a bit more expensive than the industry average as 69.23% of the companies are valued more cheaply.
When comparing the Price/Earnings ratio of SWP to the average of the S&P500 Index (27.48), we can say SWP is valued inline with the index average.
With a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 24.52, SWP is valued on the expensive side.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, SWP is valued a bit more expensive than the industry average as 61.54% of the companies are valued more cheaply.
SWP is valuated rather cheaply when we compare the Price/Forward Earnings ratio to 36.52, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 30.07 | ||
| Fwd PE | 24.52 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, SWP is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 69.23% of the companies are valued more expensively.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 7.86 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
SWP's low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
PEG (NY)0.1
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2YN/A
EPS Next 3YN/A
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
SWP does not give a dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
TSX:SWP (7/17/2025, 7:00:00 PM)
4.21
+0.03 (+0.72%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryGroupFood, Beverage & Tobacco
GICS IndustryFood Products
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst OwnersN/A
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners7.38%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap40.16M
Analysts80
Price TargetN/A
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
Yearly DividendN/A
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
DP0%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)1
Avg EPS beat(2)8.91%
Min EPS beat(2)-298.02%
Max EPS beat(2)315.84%
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)2
Avg Revenue beat(2)37.64%
Min Revenue beat(2)17.66%
Max Revenue beat(2)57.62%
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)N/A
PT rev (3m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (1m)0%
EPS NQ rev (3m)0%
EPS NY rev (1m)0%
EPS NY rev (3m)-30.31%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)0%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)0%
Revenue NY rev (1m)0%
Revenue NY rev (3m)1.23%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 30.07 | ||
| Fwd PE | 24.52 | ||
| P/S | 0.2 | ||
| P/FCF | N/A | ||
| P/OCF | N/A | ||
| P/B | 0.72 | ||
| P/tB | 0.72 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 7.86 |
EPS(TTM)0.14
EY3.33%
EPS(NY)0.17
Fwd EY4.08%
FCF(TTM)-1.82
FCFYN/A
OCF(TTM)-1.71
OCFYN/A
SpS20.62
BVpS5.84
TBVpS5.84
PEG (NY)0.1
PEG (5Y)N/A
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.21% | ||
| ROE | 4.82% | ||
| ROCE | 10.36% | ||
| ROIC | 5.69% | ||
| ROICexc | 5.91% | ||
| ROICexgc | 5.91% | ||
| OM | 6.91% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 1.36% | ||
| GM | 14.42% | ||
| FCFM | N/A |
ROA(3y)0.47%
ROA(5y)0.76%
ROE(3y)1.91%
ROE(5y)2.42%
ROIC(3y)2.76%
ROIC(5y)2.33%
ROICexc(3y)2.9%
ROICexc(5y)2.44%
ROICexgc(3y)2.9%
ROICexgc(5y)2.44%
ROCE(3y)5.03%
ROCE(5y)4.25%
ROICexcg growth 3Y34.69%
ROICexcg growth 5Y16.63%
ROICexc growth 3Y34.84%
ROICexc growth 5Y16.83%
OM growth 3Y21.99%
OM growth 5Y7.12%
PM growth 3Y22.4%
PM growth 5Y-24.48%
GM growth 3Y2.45%
GM growth 5Y-2.28%
F-Score5
Asset Turnover0.89
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.18 | ||
| Debt/FCF | N/A | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 3.21 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 15.22% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 0.53% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 2.35 | ||
| Cash Conversion | N/A | ||
| Profit Quality | N/A | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.03 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.38 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.33 |
F-Score5
WACC4.62%
ROIC/WACC1.23
Cap/Depr(3y)200.32%
Cap/Depr(5y)217.97%
Cap/Sales(3y)9.07%
Cap/Sales(5y)10.21%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)415.37%
EPS 3Y39.04%
EPS 5Y-15.93%
EPS Q2Q%155.02%
EPS Next Y296.12%
EPS Next 2YN/A
EPS Next 3YN/A
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)26.1%
Revenue growth 3Y11.44%
Revenue growth 5Y12.24%
Sales Q2Q%60.78%
Revenue Next Year6.29%
Revenue Next 2YN/A
Revenue Next 3YN/A
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y38925.7%
EBIT growth 3Y35.95%
EBIT growth 5Y20.23%
EBIT Next YearN/A
EBIT Next 3YN/A
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y44.63%
FCF growth 3YN/A
FCF growth 5YN/A
OCF growth 1Y-396.95%
OCF growth 3YN/A
OCF growth 5Y-22.07%