POWERSOFT SPA (PWS.MI) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - Euronext Milan - BIT:PWS - IT0005353815 - Common Stock
15.9 EUR
+0.05 (+0.32%)
We assign a fundamental rating of 7 out of 10 to PWS. PWS was compared to 36 industry peers in the Household Durables industry. While PWS has a great profitability rating, there are some minor concerns on its financial health. PWS is showing excellent growth while it is valued at reasonable prices. Keep and eye on this one! This makes PWS very considerable for growth investing!
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year PWS was profitable.
In the past year PWS had a positive cash flow from operations.
In the past 5 years PWS has always been profitable.
PWS had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
The Return On Assets of PWS (8.78%) is better than 88.89% of its industry peers.
PWS has a Return On Equity of 29.68%. This is amongst the best in the industry. PWS outperforms 94.44% of its industry peers.
With an excellent Return On Invested Capital value of 12.87%, PWS belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming 83.33% of the companies in the same industry.
Measured over the past 3 years, the Average Return On Invested Capital for PWS is significantly above the industry average of 9.66%.
The last Return On Invested Capital (12.87%) for PWS is well below the 3 year average (27.22%), which needs to be investigated, but indicates that PWS had better years and this may not be a problem.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.78% | ||
| ROE | 29.68% | ||
| ROIC | 12.87% |
ROA(3y)18.81%
ROA(5y)13.71%
ROE(3y)29.15%
ROE(5y)20.95%
ROIC(3y)27.22%
ROIC(5y)18.95%
1.3 Margins
PWS has a Profit Margin of 14.94%. This is amongst the best in the industry. PWS outperforms 97.22% of its industry peers.
PWS's Profit Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
The Operating Margin of PWS (22.63%) is better than 97.22% of its industry peers.
PWS's Operating Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
PWS has a Gross Margin of 51.55%. This is in the better half of the industry: PWS outperforms 69.44% of its industry peers.
PWS's Gross Margin has been stable in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 22.63% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 14.94% | ||
| GM | 51.55% |
OM growth 3Y44.17%
OM growth 5Y16.59%
PM growth 3Y36.57%
PM growth 5Y16.19%
GM growth 3Y1.4%
GM growth 5Y0.56%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), PWS is creating value.
The number of shares outstanding for PWS has been increased compared to 1 year ago.
Compared to 5 years ago, PWS has more shares outstanding
The debt/assets ratio for PWS is higher compared to a year ago.
2.2 Solvency
An Altman-Z score of 2.93 indicates that PWS is not a great score, but indicates only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
PWS's Altman-Z score of 2.93 is fine compared to the rest of the industry. PWS outperforms 75.00% of its industry peers.
PWS has a debt to FCF ratio of 8.47. This is a slightly negative value and a sign of low solvency as PWS would need 8.47 years to pay back of all of its debts.
With a decent Debt to FCF ratio value of 8.47, PWS is doing good in the industry, outperforming 63.89% of the companies in the same industry.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 1.44 is on the high side and indicates that PWS has dependencies on debt financing.
The Debt to Equity ratio of PWS (1.44) is worse than 83.33% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.44 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 8.47 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.93 |
ROIC/WACC1.6
WACC8.04%
2.3 Liquidity
PWS has a Current Ratio of 2.02. This indicates that PWS is financially healthy and has no problem in meeting its short term obligations.
PWS's Current ratio of 2.02 is fine compared to the rest of the industry. PWS outperforms 66.67% of its industry peers.
PWS has a Quick Ratio of 1.17. This is a normal value and indicates that PWS is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
PWS has a Quick ratio of 1.17. This is in the better half of the industry: PWS outperforms 75.00% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.02 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.17 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
PWS shows a strong negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year the EPS decreased by -16.28%.
PWS shows a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. Measured over the last years, the EPS has been growing by 32.97% yearly.
Looking at the last year, PWS shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has grown by 3.26% in the last year.
PWS shows quite a strong growth in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been growing by 14.10% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-16.28%
EPS 3Y78.25%
EPS 5Y32.97%
EPS Q2Q%-20.1%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)3.26%
Revenue growth 3Y28.9%
Revenue growth 5Y14.1%
Sales Q2Q%11.46%
3.2 Future
The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 74.94% on average over the next years. This is a very strong growth
The Revenue is expected to grow by 47.35% on average over the next years. This is a very strong growth
EPS Next Y114.01%
EPS Next 2Y74.94%
EPS Next 3YN/A
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year71.68%
Revenue Next 2Y47.35%
Revenue Next 3YN/A
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
The Revenue growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
A Price/Earnings ratio of 17.28 indicates a rather expensive valuation of PWS.
69.44% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than PWS, based on the Price/Earnings ratio.
The average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio is at 26.61. PWS is valued slightly cheaper when compared to this.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 12.30, the valuation of PWS can be described as correct.
The rest of the industry has a similar Price/Forward Earnings ratio as PWS.
When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of PWS to the average of the S&P500 Index (24.01), we can say PWS is valued slightly cheaper.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 17.28 | ||
| Fwd PE | 12.3 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, PWS is valued a bit more expensive than the industry average as 63.89% of the companies are valued more cheaply.
The rest of the industry has a similar Price/Free Cash Flow ratio as PWS.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 23.75 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 12.05 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
The excellent profitability rating of PWS may justify a higher PE ratio.
PWS's earnings are expected to grow with 74.94% in the coming years. This may justify a more expensive valuation.
PEG (NY)0.15
PEG (5Y)0.52
EPS Next 2Y74.94%
EPS Next 3YN/A
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
PWS has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 5.00%, which is a nice return.
PWS's Dividend Yield is a higher than the industry average which is at 2.65.
PWS's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 1.87.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 5% |
5.2 History
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
PWS has negative earnings and hence a negative payout ratio. The dividend may be in danger.
DP0%
EPS Next 2Y74.94%
EPS Next 3YN/A
BIT:PWS (12/16/2025, 7:00:00 PM)
15.9
+0.05 (+0.32%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryGroupConsumer Durables & Apparel
GICS IndustryHousehold Durables
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners7.93%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners3.03%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap204.16M
Revenue(TTM)75.59M
Net Income(TTM)11.30M
Analysts80
Price TargetN/A
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 5% |
Yearly Dividend0.87
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
DP0%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)0%
PT rev (3m)0%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)0%
EPS NY rev (3m)0%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)0%
Revenue NY rev (3m)0%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 17.28 | ||
| Fwd PE | 12.3 | ||
| P/S | 2.7 | ||
| P/FCF | 23.75 | ||
| P/OCF | 17.65 | ||
| P/B | 5.36 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 12.05 |
EPS(TTM)0.92
EY5.79%
EPS(NY)1.29
Fwd EY8.13%
FCF(TTM)0.67
FCFY4.21%
OCF(TTM)0.9
OCFY5.66%
SpS5.89
BVpS2.96
TBVpS-1.02
PEG (NY)0.15
PEG (5Y)0.52
Graham Number7.83
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.78% | ||
| ROE | 29.68% | ||
| ROCE | 17.78% | ||
| ROIC | 12.87% | ||
| ROICexc | 16.55% | ||
| ROICexgc | 52.48% | ||
| OM | 22.63% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 14.94% | ||
| GM | 51.55% | ||
| FCFM | 11.37% |
ROA(3y)18.81%
ROA(5y)13.71%
ROE(3y)29.15%
ROE(5y)20.95%
ROIC(3y)27.22%
ROIC(5y)18.95%
ROICexc(3y)31.93%
ROICexc(5y)27.29%
ROICexgc(3y)33.83%
ROICexgc(5y)30.02%
ROCE(3y)37.61%
ROCE(5y)26.17%
ROICexgc growth 3Y0.08%
ROICexgc growth 5Y-0.25%
ROICexc growth 3Y5.02%
ROICexc growth 5Y1.25%
OM growth 3Y44.17%
OM growth 5Y16.59%
PM growth 3Y36.57%
PM growth 5Y16.19%
GM growth 3Y1.4%
GM growth 5Y0.56%
F-Score4
Asset Turnover0.59
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.44 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 8.47 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 2.64 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 82.45% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 3.93% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 250 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 55.86% | ||
| Profit Quality | 76.1% | ||
| Current Ratio | 2.02 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.17 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.93 |
F-Score4
WACC8.04%
ROIC/WACC1.6
Cap/Depr(3y)57.82%
Cap/Depr(5y)40.08%
Cap/Sales(3y)2.4%
Cap/Sales(5y)1.78%
Profit Quality(3y)55.36%
Profit Quality(5y)115.68%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-16.28%
EPS 3Y78.25%
EPS 5Y32.97%
EPS Q2Q%-20.1%
EPS Next Y114.01%
EPS Next 2Y74.94%
EPS Next 3YN/A
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)3.26%
Revenue growth 3Y28.9%
Revenue growth 5Y14.1%
Sales Q2Q%11.46%
Revenue Next Year71.68%
Revenue Next 2Y47.35%
Revenue Next 3YN/A
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y-4.14%
EBIT growth 3Y85.84%
EBIT growth 5Y33.02%
EBIT Next Year170.58%
EBIT Next 3YN/A
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-1.55%
FCF growth 3Y-58.91%
FCF growth 5Y-34.21%
OCF growth 1Y19.37%
OCF growth 3Y-27.03%
OCF growth 5Y-8.28%
POWERSOFT SPA / PWS.MI FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for POWERSOFT SPA?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 7 / 10 to PWS.MI.
What is the valuation status of POWERSOFT SPA (PWS.MI) stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 5 / 10 to POWERSOFT SPA (PWS.MI). This can be considered as Fairly Valued.
What is the profitability of PWS stock?
POWERSOFT SPA (PWS.MI) has a profitability rating of 9 / 10.
What are the PE and PB ratios of POWERSOFT SPA (PWS.MI) stock?
The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for POWERSOFT SPA (PWS.MI) is 17.28 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 5.36.
How sustainable is the dividend of POWERSOFT SPA (PWS.MI) stock?
The dividend rating of POWERSOFT SPA (PWS.MI) is 4 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 0%.