ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM)
IL0065100930 - Common Stock
We assign a fundamental rating of 2 out of 10 to ZIM. ZIM was compared to 29 industry peers in the Marine Transportation industry. ZIM may be in some trouble as it scores bad on both profitability and health. ZIM does not seem to be growing, but still is valued expensively.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year ZIM has reported negative net income.
ZIM had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
In multiple years ZIM reported negative net income over the last 5 years.
ZIM had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
ZIM has a Return On Assets of -32.30%. This is amonst the worse of the industry: ZIM underperforms 96.55% of its industry peers.
ZIM has a worse Return On Equity (-109.81%) than 96.55% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | -32.3% | ||
| ROE | -109.81% | ||
| ROIC | N/A |
ROA(3y)18.19%
ROA(5y)14.4%
ROE(3y)23.22%
ROE(5y)N/A
ROIC(3y)N/A
ROIC(5y)N/A
1.3 Margins
ZIM does not have Profit Margin and Operating Margin and Gross Margin available, so we won't be analyzing them here.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | N/A | ||
| PM (TTM) | N/A | ||
| GM | N/A |
OM growth 3YN/A
OM growth 5YN/A
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3YN/A
GM growth 5YN/A
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
ZIM does not have a ROIC to compare to the WACC, probably because it is not profitable.
Compared to 1 year ago, ZIM has more shares outstanding
ZIM has more shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
ZIM has a worse debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
ZIM has an Altman-Z score of 1.08. This is a bad value and indicates that ZIM is not financially healthy and even has some risk of bankruptcy.
ZIM has a worse Altman-Z score (1.08) than 62.07% of its industry peers.
ZIM has a debt to FCF ratio of 5.54. This is a neutral value as ZIM would need 5.54 years to pay back of all of its debts.
ZIM has a better Debt to FCF ratio (5.54) than 72.41% of its industry peers.
ZIM has a Debt/Equity ratio of 1.35. This is a high value indicating a heavy dependency on external financing.
Looking at the Debt to Equity ratio, with a value of 1.35, ZIM is doing worse than 89.66% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.35 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 5.54 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.08 |
ROIC/WACCN/A
WACC7.16%
2.3 Liquidity
ZIM has a Current Ratio of 1.02. This is a normal value and indicates that ZIM is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
The Current ratio of ZIM (1.02) is worse than 75.86% of its industry peers.
ZIM has a Quick Ratio of 1.02. This is a bad value and indicates that ZIM is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
ZIM's Quick ratio of 0.95 is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. ZIM is outperformed by 79.31% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.02 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.95 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The earnings per share for ZIM have decreased strongly by -113.71% in the last year.
ZIM shows a very negative growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has decreased by -58.90%.
Measured over the past years, ZIM shows a quite strong growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 9.71% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-113.71%
EPS 3YN/A
EPS 5YN/A
EPS growth Q2Q-135.76%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-58.9%
Revenue growth 3Y8.95%
Revenue growth 5Y9.71%
Revenue growth Q2Q-44.94%
3.2 Future
ZIM is expected to show quite a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. In the coming years, the EPS will grow by 18.70% yearly.
Based on estimates for the next years, ZIM will show a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 2.27% on average per year.
EPS Next Y79.85%
EPS Next 2Y7.89%
EPS Next 3Y18.7%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year8.72%
Revenue Next 2Y0.22%
Revenue Next 3Y2.27%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
The Price/Earnings Ratio is negative for ZIM. In the last year negative earnings were reported.
Besides the negative Price/Earnings Ratio, also the Forward Price/Earnings Ratio is negative for ZIM. No positive earnings are expected for the next year.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | N/A | ||
| Fwd PE | N/A |
4.2 Price Multiples
68.97% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than ZIM, based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio of ZIM indicates a rather cheap valuation: ZIM is cheaper than 89.66% of the companies listed in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 2.49 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 4.65 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
A more expensive valuation may be justified as ZIM's earnings are expected to grow with 18.70% in the coming years.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y7.89%
EPS Next 3Y18.7%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
ZIM does not give a dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV
NYSE:ZIM (5/17/2024, 7:04:00 PM)
After market: 18.78 +0.05 (+0.27%)18.73
-0.22 (-1.16%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorIndustrials
GICS IndustryGroupTransportation
GICS IndustryMarine Transportation
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners
Inst Owner Change
Ins Owners
Ins Owner Change
Market Cap2.25B
Analysts
Price Target
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
Dividend Growth(5Y)
DP
Div Incr Years
Div Non Decr Years
Ex-Date
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)
Avg EPS beat(2)
Min EPS beat(2)
Max EPS beat(2)
EPS beat(4)
Avg EPS beat(4)
Min EPS beat(4)
Max EPS beat(4)
EPS beat(8)
Avg EPS beat(8)
EPS beat(12)
Avg EPS beat(12)
EPS beat(16)
Avg EPS beat(16)
Revenue beat(2)
Avg Revenue beat(2)
Min Revenue beat(2)
Max Revenue beat(2)
Revenue beat(4)
Avg Revenue beat(4)
Min Revenue beat(4)
Max Revenue beat(4)
Revenue beat(8)
Avg Revenue beat(8)
Revenue beat(12)
Avg Revenue beat(12)
Revenue beat(16)
Avg Revenue beat(16)
PT rev (1m)
PT rev (3m)
EPS NQ rev (1m)
EPS NQ rev (3m)
EPS NY rev (1m)
EPS NY rev (3m)
Revenue NQ rev (1m)
Revenue NQ rev (3m)
Revenue NY rev (1m)
Revenue NY rev (3m)
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | N/A | ||
| Fwd PE | N/A | ||
| P/S | |||
| P/FCF | |||
| P/OCF | |||
| P/B | |||
| P/tB | |||
| EV/EBITDA |
EPS(TTM)
EY
EPS(NY)
Fwd EY
FCF(TTM)
FCFY
OCF(TTM)
OCFY
SpS
BVpS
TBVpS
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | -32.3% | ||
| ROE | -109.81% | ||
| ROCE | |||
| ROIC | |||
| ROICexc | |||
| ROICexgc | |||
| OM | N/A | ||
| PM (TTM) | N/A | ||
| GM | N/A | ||
| FCFM |
ROA(3y)
ROA(5y)
ROE(3y)
ROE(5y)
ROIC(3y)
ROIC(5y)
ROICexc(3y)
ROICexc(5y)
ROICexgc(3y)
ROICexgc(5y)
ROCE(3y)
ROCE(5y)
ROICexcg growth 3Y
ROICexcg growth 5Y
ROICexc growth 3Y
ROICexc growth 5Y
OM growth 3Y
OM growth 5Y
PM growth 3Y
PM growth 5Y
GM growth 3Y
GM growth 5Y
F-Score
Asset Turnover0.62
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.35 | ||
| Debt/FCF | |||
| Debt/EBITDA | |||
| Cap/Depr | |||
| Cap/Sales | |||
| Interest Coverage | |||
| Cash Conversion | |||
| Profit Quality | |||
| Current Ratio | 1.02 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.95 | ||
| Altman-Z |
F-Score
WACC
ROIC/WACC
Cap/Depr(3y)
Cap/Depr(5y)
Cap/Sales(3y)
Cap/Sales(5y)
Profit Quality(3y)
Profit Quality(5y)
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-113.71%
EPS 3YN/A
EPS 5Y
EPS growth Q2Q
EPS Next Y79.85%
EPS Next 2Y
EPS Next 3Y
EPS Next 5Y
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-58.9%
Revenue growth 3Y8.95%
Revenue growth 5Y
Revenue growth Q2Q
Revenue Next Year
Revenue Next 2Y
Revenue Next 3Y
Revenue Next 5Y
EBIT growth 1Y
EBIT growth 3Y
EBIT growth 5Y
EBIT Next Year
EBIT Next 3Y
EBIT Next 5Y
FCF growth 1Y
FCF growth 3Y
FCF growth 5Y
OCF growth 1Y
OCF growth 3Y
OCF growth 5Y