ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) Stock Fundamental Analysis
USA - NYSE:ZIM - IL0065100930 - Common Stock
14.66 USD
-0.45 (-2.98%)
14.69 USD
+0.03 (+0.2%)
Taking everything into account, ZIM scores 5 out of 10 in our fundamental rating. ZIM was compared to 35 industry peers in the Marine Transportation industry. While ZIM has a great profitability rating, there are some minor concerns on its financial health. ZIM has a correct valuation and a medium growth rate.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
ZIM had positive earnings in the past year.
ZIM had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
ZIM had positive earnings in 4 of the past 5 years.
In the past 5 years ZIM always reported a positive cash flow from operatings.
1.2 Ratios
Looking at the Return On Assets, with a value of 18.07%, ZIM belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 91.43% of the companies in the same industry.
With an excellent Return On Equity value of 51.44%, ZIM belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming 100.00% of the companies in the same industry.
Looking at the Return On Invested Capital, with a value of 22.14%, ZIM belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 97.14% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 18.07% | ||
| ROE | 51.44% | ||
| ROIC | 22.14% |
ROA(3y)8.76%
ROA(5y)18.36%
ROE(3y)7.27%
ROE(5y)63.37%
ROIC(3y)N/A
ROIC(5y)N/A
1.3 Margins
The Profit Margin of ZIM (23.38%) is better than 82.86% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of ZIM has declined.
ZIM has a Operating Margin of 28.74%. This is in the better half of the industry: ZIM outperforms 77.14% of its industry peers.
ZIM's Operating Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
The Gross Margin of ZIM (32.54%) is worse than 68.57% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of ZIM has grown nicely.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 28.74% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 23.38% | ||
| GM | 32.54% |
OM growth 3Y-18.26%
OM growth 5Y53.61%
PM growth 3Y-16.16%
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-16.4%
GM growth 5Y32.89%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), ZIM is creating value.
Compared to 1 year ago, ZIM has about the same amount of shares outstanding.
Compared to 5 years ago, ZIM has more shares outstanding
ZIM has a better debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
An Altman-Z score of 2.20 indicates that ZIM is not a great score, but indicates only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
The Altman-Z score of ZIM (2.20) is better than 74.29% of its industry peers.
The Debt to FCF ratio of ZIM is 1.59, which is an excellent value as it means it would take ZIM, only 1.59 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
ZIM has a Debt to FCF ratio of 1.59. This is in the better half of the industry: ZIM outperforms 80.00% of its industry peers.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 1.21 is on the high side and indicates that ZIM has dependencies on debt financing.
With a Debt to Equity ratio value of 1.21, ZIM is not doing good in the industry: 80.00% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
Although ZIM does not score too well on debt/equity it has very limited outstanding debt, which is well covered by the FCF. We will not put too much weight on the debt/equity number as it may be because of low equity, which could be a consequence of a share buyback program for instance. This needs to be investigated.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.21 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 1.59 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.2 |
ROIC/WACC2.49
WACC8.88%
2.3 Liquidity
ZIM has a Current Ratio of 1.20. This is a normal value and indicates that ZIM is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
Looking at the Current ratio, with a value of 1.20, ZIM is doing worse than 60.00% of the companies in the same industry.
A Quick Ratio of 1.11 indicates that ZIM should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
Looking at the Quick ratio, with a value of 1.11, ZIM is doing worse than 60.00% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.2 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.11 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The Earnings Per Share has grown by an impressive 1834.88% over the past year.
The earnings per share for ZIM have been decreasing by -22.88% on average. This is quite bad
ZIM shows a strong growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 43.57%.
The Revenue has been growing by 20.62% on average over the past years. This is a very strong growth!
EPS 1Y (TTM)1834.88%
EPS 3Y-22.88%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%-93.83%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)43.57%
Revenue growth 3Y-7.73%
Revenue growth 5Y20.62%
Sales Q2Q%-15.36%
3.2 Future
Based on estimates for the next years, ZIM will show a very negative growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will decrease by -29.76% on average per year.
Based on estimates for the next years, ZIM will show a very negative growth in Revenue. The Revenue will decrease by -10.71% on average per year.
EPS Next Y-84.95%
EPS Next 2Y-49.9%
EPS Next 3Y-29.76%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year-15.53%
Revenue Next 2Y-15.3%
Revenue Next 3Y-10.71%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
The Revenue growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio of 0.88, the valuation of ZIM can be described as very cheap.
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, ZIM is valued cheaper than 97.14% of the companies in the same industry.
When comparing the Price/Earnings ratio of ZIM to the average of the S&P500 Index (25.67), we can say ZIM is valued rather cheaply.
ZIM is expected to report negative earnings next year, which makes the Forward Price/Earnings Ratio negative.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 0.88 | ||
| Fwd PE | N/A |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, ZIM is valued cheaper than 85.71% of the companies in the same industry.
Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, ZIM is valued cheaper than 100.00% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 0.47 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 1.45 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
ZIM has a very decent profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
A cheap valuation may be justified as ZIM's earnings are expected to decrease with -29.76% in the coming years.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y-49.9%
EPS Next 3Y-29.76%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 49.49%, ZIM is a good candidate for dividend investing.
ZIM's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the industry average which is at 7.05. ZIM pays more dividend than 100.00% of the companies in the same industry.
ZIM's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 2.40.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 49.49% |
5.2 History
ZIM has been paying a dividend for over 5 years, so it has already some track record.
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
51.00% of the earnings are spent on dividend by ZIM. This is a bit on the high side, but may be sustainable.
DP51%
EPS Next 2Y-49.9%
EPS Next 3Y-29.76%
14.66
-0.45 (-2.98%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorIndustrials
GICS IndustryGroupTransportation
GICS IndustryMarine Transportation
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners53.44%
Inst Owner Change0.92%
Ins Owners1.17%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap1.77B
Revenue(TTM)8.58B
Net Income(TTM)2.00B
Analysts42.67
Price Target13.6 (-7.23%)
Short Float %19.84%
Short Ratio5.06
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 49.49% |
Yearly Dividend4.81
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
DP51%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-Date
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)1
Avg EPS beat(2)-23.6%
Min EPS beat(2)-76.76%
Max EPS beat(2)29.56%
EPS beat(4)3
Avg EPS beat(4)7.52%
Min EPS beat(4)-76.76%
Max EPS beat(4)46.04%
EPS beat(8)5
Avg EPS beat(8)3.03%
EPS beat(12)7
Avg EPS beat(12)-1097.29%
EPS beat(16)10
Avg EPS beat(16)-820.85%
Revenue beat(2)1
Avg Revenue beat(2)0.04%
Min Revenue beat(2)-7.17%
Max Revenue beat(2)7.25%
Revenue beat(4)3
Avg Revenue beat(4)4.22%
Min Revenue beat(4)-7.17%
Max Revenue beat(4)12.54%
Revenue beat(8)4
Avg Revenue beat(8)1.28%
Revenue beat(12)6
Avg Revenue beat(12)-0.32%
Revenue beat(16)9
Avg Revenue beat(16)0.64%
PT rev (1m)-8.05%
PT rev (3m)-13.11%
EPS NQ rev (1m)-23.55%
EPS NQ rev (3m)47.98%
EPS NY rev (1m)-10.77%
EPS NY rev (3m)-7.66%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)0.11%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)1.77%
Revenue NY rev (1m)-0.06%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-1.1%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 0.88 | ||
| Fwd PE | N/A | ||
| P/S | 0.21 | ||
| P/FCF | 0.47 | ||
| P/OCF | 0.45 | ||
| P/B | 0.45 | ||
| P/tB | 0.47 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 1.45 |
EPS(TTM)16.64
EY113.51%
EPS(NY)-4.41
Fwd EYN/A
FCF(TTM)30.88
FCFY210.66%
OCF(TTM)32.76
OCFY223.44%
SpS71.19
BVpS32.35
TBVpS31.44
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number110.06
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 18.07% | ||
| ROE | 51.44% | ||
| ROCE | 28.03% | ||
| ROIC | 22.14% | ||
| ROICexc | 27.73% | ||
| ROICexgc | 28.17% | ||
| OM | 28.74% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 23.38% | ||
| GM | 32.54% | ||
| FCFM | 43.38% |
ROA(3y)8.76%
ROA(5y)18.36%
ROE(3y)7.27%
ROE(5y)63.37%
ROIC(3y)N/A
ROIC(5y)N/A
ROICexc(3y)N/A
ROICexc(5y)N/A
ROICexgc(3y)N/A
ROICexgc(5y)N/A
ROCE(3y)N/A
ROCE(5y)N/A
ROICexgc growth 3Y-39.31%
ROICexgc growth 5Y21.82%
ROICexc growth 3Y-39.21%
ROICexc growth 5Y23.31%
OM growth 3Y-18.26%
OM growth 5Y53.61%
PM growth 3Y-16.16%
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-16.4%
GM growth 5Y32.89%
F-Score7
Asset Turnover0.77
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.21 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 1.59 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 1.27 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 18.16% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 2.63% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 5.07 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 106.43% | ||
| Profit Quality | 185.54% | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.2 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.11 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.2 |
F-Score7
WACC8.88%
ROIC/WACC2.49
Cap/Depr(3y)17.11%
Cap/Depr(5y)N/A
Cap/Sales(3y)2.51%
Cap/Sales(5y)N/A
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)1834.88%
EPS 3Y-22.88%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%-93.83%
EPS Next Y-84.95%
EPS Next 2Y-49.9%
EPS Next 3Y-29.76%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)43.57%
Revenue growth 3Y-7.73%
Revenue growth 5Y20.62%
Sales Q2Q%-15.36%
Revenue Next Year-15.53%
Revenue Next 2Y-15.3%
Revenue Next 3Y-10.71%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y691.65%
EBIT growth 3Y-24.58%
EBIT growth 5Y85.29%
EBIT Next Year-11.28%
EBIT Next 3Y-20.41%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y30.37%
FCF growth 3Y-10.68%
FCF growth 5Y57.03%
OCF growth 1Y21.02%
OCF growth 3Y-14.34%
OCF growth 5Y58.89%
ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV / ZIM FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to ZIM.
What is the valuation status of ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 5 / 10 to ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM). This can be considered as Fairly Valued.
How profitable is ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) stock?
ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) has a profitability rating of 7 / 10.
Can you provide the financial health for ZIM stock?
The financial health rating of ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) is 5 / 10.
What is the earnings growth outlook for ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERV (ZIM) is expected to decline by -84.95% in the next year.