WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP-ADR (WDS)
US9802283088 - ADR
WDS gets a fundamental rating of 3 out of 10. The analysis compared the fundamentals against 213 industry peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. WDS has a bad profitability rating. Also its financial health evaluation is rather negative. WDS does not seem to be growing, but still is valued expensively.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year WDS was profitable.
WDS had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
Of the past 5 years WDS 4 years were profitable.
Each year in the past 5 years WDS had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
WDS's Return On Assets of 3.00% is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. WDS is outperformed by 71.70% of its industry peers.
With a Return On Equity value of 4.83%, WDS is not doing good in the industry: 74.53% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
WDS's Return On Invested Capital of 6.54% is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. WDS is outperformed by 61.32% of its industry peers.
WDS had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 8.25%. This is significantly below the industry average of 46.07%.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 3% | ||
| ROE | 4.83% | ||
| ROIC | 6.54% |
ROA(3y)7.15%
ROA(5y)1.25%
ROE(3y)12.49%
ROE(5y)1.23%
ROIC(3y)8.25%
ROIC(5y)5.81%
1.3 Margins
The Profit Margin of WDS (11.86%) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of WDS has declined.
Looking at the Operating Margin, with a value of 37.88%, WDS is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 68.87% of the companies in the same industry.
WDS's Operating Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
WDS's Gross Margin of 46.27% is in line compared to the rest of the industry. WDS outperforms 45.28% of its industry peers.
WDS's Gross Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 37.88% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 11.86% | ||
| GM | 46.27% |
OM growth 3Y139.66%
OM growth 5Y-2.53%
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5Y-14.55%
GM growth 3Y39.39%
GM growth 5Y-1.66%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
WDS has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is just above the Cost of Capital (WACC), which means it is creating some value.
The number of shares outstanding for WDS remains at a similar level compared to 1 year ago.
WDS has more shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
Compared to 1 year ago, WDS has a worse debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
Based on the Altman-Z score of 1.71, we must say that WDS is in the distress zone and has some risk of bankruptcy.
Looking at the Altman-Z score, with a value of 1.71, WDS is in line with its industry, outperforming 53.30% of the companies in the same industry.
WDS has a debt to FCF ratio of 7.61. This is a slightly negative value and a sign of low solvency as WDS would need 7.61 years to pay back of all of its debts.
WDS's Debt to FCF ratio of 7.61 is in line compared to the rest of the industry. WDS outperforms 47.64% of its industry peers.
WDS has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.18. This is a healthy value indicating a solid balance between debt and equity.
With a decent Debt to Equity ratio value of 0.18, WDS is doing good in the industry, outperforming 71.23% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.18 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 7.61 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.71 |
ROIC/WACC0.89
WACC7.36%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 1.03 indicates that WDS should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
WDS has a Current ratio (1.03) which is in line with its industry peers.
WDS has a Quick Ratio of 1.03. This is a bad value and indicates that WDS is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
WDS has a Quick ratio (0.90) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.03 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.9 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
WDS shows a strong negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year the EPS decreased by -49.37%.
The Earnings Per Share has been growing slightly by 2.48% on average over the past years.
WDS shows a very negative growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has decreased by -16.79%.
WDS shows a strong growth in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been growing by 21.71% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-49.37%
EPS 3Y54.61%
EPS 5Y2.48%
EPS growth Q2Q-59.43%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-16.79%
Revenue growth 3Y57.23%
Revenue growth 5Y21.71%
Revenue growth Q2Q-40.09%
3.2 Future
WDS is expected to show a decrease in Earnings Per Share. In the coming years, the EPS will decrease by -4.73% yearly.
Based on estimates for the next years, WDS will show a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 0.54% on average per year.
EPS Next Y-17.41%
EPS Next 2Y-13.05%
EPS Next 3Y-12.75%
EPS Next 5Y-4.73%
Revenue Next Year-1.14%
Revenue Next 2Y-0.92%
Revenue Next 3Y-1.73%
Revenue Next 5Y0.54%
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
With a Price/Earnings ratio of 10.84, the valuation of WDS can be described as very reasonable.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Earnings ratio of WDS is on the same level as its industry peers.
WDS is valuated cheaply when we compare the Price/Earnings ratio to 24.80, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 13.09, the valuation of WDS can be described as correct.
The rest of the industry has a similar Price/Forward Earnings ratio as WDS.
The average S&P500 Price/Forward Earnings ratio is at 21.27. WDS is valued slightly cheaper when compared to this.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 10.84 | ||
| Fwd PE | 13.09 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, WDS is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 72.17% of the companies are valued more expensively.
64.62% of the companies in the same industry are cheaper than WDS, based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 41.71 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 4.23 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
WDS's earnings are expected to decrease with -12.75% in the coming years. This may justify a cheaper valuation.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)4.38
EPS Next 2Y-13.05%
EPS Next 3Y-12.75%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 7.06%, WDS is a good candidate for dividend investing.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 5.80, WDS pays a bit more dividend than its industry peers.
Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 2.40, WDS pays a better dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 7.06% |
5.2 History
On average, the dividend of WDS grows each year by 38.25%, which is quite nice.
WDS has been paying a dividend for at least 10 years, so it has a reliable track record.
WDS has decreased its dividend in the last 3 years.
Dividend Growth(5Y)38.25%
Div Incr Years2
Div Non Decr Years2
5.3 Sustainability
256.20% of the earnings are spent on dividend by WDS. This is not a sustainable payout ratio.
The Dividend Rate of WDS has been growing, while earnings will be declining. This means the dividend growth is most likely not sustainable.
DP256.2%
EPS Next 2Y-13.05%
EPS Next 3Y-12.75%
WOODSIDE ENERGY GROUP-ADR
NYSE:WDS (4/18/2024, 7:28:00 PM)
Premarket: 18.67 -0.09 (-0.48%)18.76
-0.1 (-0.53%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorEnergy
GICS IndustryGroupEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners
Inst Owner Change
Ins Owners
Ins Owner Change
Market Cap35.62B
Analysts
Price Target
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 7.06% |
Dividend Growth(5Y)
DP
Div Incr Years
Div Non Decr Years
Ex-Date
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)
Avg EPS beat(2)
Min EPS beat(2)
Max EPS beat(2)
EPS beat(4)
Avg EPS beat(4)
Min EPS beat(4)
Max EPS beat(4)
EPS beat(8)
Avg EPS beat(8)
EPS beat(12)
Avg EPS beat(12)
EPS beat(16)
Avg EPS beat(16)
Revenue beat(2)
Avg Revenue beat(2)
Min Revenue beat(2)
Max Revenue beat(2)
Revenue beat(4)
Avg Revenue beat(4)
Min Revenue beat(4)
Max Revenue beat(4)
Revenue beat(8)
Avg Revenue beat(8)
Revenue beat(12)
Avg Revenue beat(12)
Revenue beat(16)
Avg Revenue beat(16)
PT rev (1m)
PT rev (3m)
EPS NQ rev (1m)
EPS NQ rev (3m)
EPS NY rev (1m)
EPS NY rev (3m)
Revenue NQ rev (1m)
Revenue NQ rev (3m)
Revenue NY rev (1m)
Revenue NY rev (3m)
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 10.84 | ||
| Fwd PE | 13.09 | ||
| P/S | |||
| P/FCF | |||
| P/OCF | |||
| P/B | |||
| P/tB | |||
| EV/EBITDA |
EPS(TTM)
EY
EPS(NY)
Fwd EY
FCF(TTM)
FCFY
OCF(TTM)
OCFY
SpS
BVpS
TBVpS
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)4.38
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 3% | ||
| ROE | 4.83% | ||
| ROCE | |||
| ROIC | |||
| ROICexc | |||
| ROICexgc | |||
| OM | 37.88% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 11.86% | ||
| GM | 46.27% | ||
| FCFM |
ROA(3y)
ROA(5y)
ROE(3y)
ROE(5y)
ROIC(3y)
ROIC(5y)
ROICexc(3y)
ROICexc(5y)
ROICexgc(3y)
ROICexgc(5y)
ROCE(3y)
ROCE(5y)
ROICexcg growth 3Y
ROICexcg growth 5Y
ROICexc growth 3Y
ROICexc growth 5Y
OM growth 3Y
OM growth 5Y
PM growth 3Y
PM growth 5Y
GM growth 3Y
GM growth 5Y
F-Score
Asset Turnover0.25
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.18 | ||
| Debt/FCF | |||
| Debt/EBITDA | |||
| Cap/Depr | |||
| Cap/Sales | |||
| Interest Coverage | |||
| Cash Conversion | |||
| Profit Quality | |||
| Current Ratio | 1.03 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.9 | ||
| Altman-Z |
F-Score
WACC
ROIC/WACC
Cap/Depr(3y)
Cap/Depr(5y)
Cap/Sales(3y)
Cap/Sales(5y)
Profit Quality(3y)
Profit Quality(5y)
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-49.37%
EPS 3Y54.61%
EPS 5Y
EPS growth Q2Q
EPS Next Y-17.41%
EPS Next 2Y
EPS Next 3Y
EPS Next 5Y
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-16.79%
Revenue growth 3Y57.23%
Revenue growth 5Y
Revenue growth Q2Q
Revenue Next Year
Revenue Next 2Y
Revenue Next 3Y
Revenue Next 5Y
EBIT growth 1Y
EBIT growth 3Y
EBIT growth 5Y
EBIT Next Year
EBIT Next 3Y
EBIT Next 5Y
FCF growth 1Y
FCF growth 3Y
FCF growth 5Y
OCF growth 1Y
OCF growth 3Y
OCF growth 5Y