SGS SA-REG (SUV.DE) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - Frankfurt Stock Exchange - FRA:SUV - CH1256740924 - Common Stock
97.64 EUR
+2.18 (+2.28%)
SUV gets a fundamental rating of 5 out of 10. The analysis compared the fundamentals against 34 industry peers in the Professional Services industry. While SUV belongs to the best of the industry regarding profitability, there are some minor concerns on its financial health. While showing a medium growth rate, SUV is valued expensive at the moment.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
SUV had positive earnings in the past year.
In the past year SUV had a positive cash flow from operations.
Each year in the past 5 years SUV has been profitable.
SUV had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
With a decent Return On Assets value of 8.74%, SUV is doing good in the industry, outperforming 76.47% of the companies in the same industry.
SUV has a Return On Equity of 97.97%. This is amongst the best in the industry. SUV outperforms 94.12% of its industry peers.
SUV's Return On Invested Capital of 16.53% is fine compared to the rest of the industry. SUV outperforms 79.41% of its industry peers.
Measured over the past 3 years, the Average Return On Invested Capital for SUV is above the industry average of 11.10%.
The last Return On Invested Capital (16.53%) for SUV is above the 3 year average (15.86%), which is a sign of increasing profitability.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.74% | ||
| ROE | 97.97% | ||
| ROIC | 16.53% |
ROA(3y)8.35%
ROA(5y)8.15%
ROE(3y)93.2%
ROE(5y)75.95%
ROIC(3y)15.86%
ROIC(5y)15.11%
1.3 Margins
SUV has a better Profit Margin (9.13%) than 70.59% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of SUV has declined.
The Operating Margin of SUV (13.57%) is better than 70.59% of its industry peers.
SUV's Operating Margin has been stable in the last couple of years.
SUV has a better Gross Margin (93.97%) than 82.35% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of SUV has remained more or less at the same level.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 13.57% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 9.13% | ||
| GM | 93.97% |
OM growth 3Y-3.92%
OM growth 5Y0.07%
PM growth 3Y-3.68%
PM growth 5Y-3.08%
GM growth 3Y-0.03%
GM growth 5Y-0.05%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), so SUV is creating value.
Compared to 1 year ago, SUV has more shares outstanding
The number of shares outstanding for SUV remains at a similar level compared to 5 years ago.
SUV has a better debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
SUV has an Altman-Z score of 3.61. This indicates that SUV is financially healthy and has little risk of bankruptcy at the moment.
SUV has a better Altman-Z score (3.61) than 82.35% of its industry peers.
The Debt to FCF ratio of SUV is 4.46, which is a neutral value as it means it would take SUV, 4.46 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
The Debt to FCF ratio of SUV (4.46) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
SUV has a Debt/Equity ratio of 5.03. This is a high value indicating a heavy dependency on external financing.
Looking at the Debt to Equity ratio, with a value of 5.03, SUV is doing worse than 82.35% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 5.03 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 4.46 | ||
| Altman-Z | 3.61 |
ROIC/WACC3.77
WACC4.39%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 1.13 indicates that SUV should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
Looking at the Current ratio, with a value of 1.13, SUV is in line with its industry, outperforming 50.00% of the companies in the same industry.
SUV has a Quick Ratio of 1.01. This is a normal value and indicates that SUV is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
SUV has a Quick ratio (1.01) which is in line with its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.13 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.01 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The Earnings Per Share has been growing slightly by 5.98% over the past year.
Measured over the past years, SUV shows a very negative growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been decreasing by -46.67% on average per year.
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 3.12% in the past year.
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 0.58% on average over the past years.
EPS 1Y (TTM)5.98%
EPS 3Y0.75%
EPS 5Y-46.67%
EPS Q2Q%3.59%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)3.12%
Revenue growth 3Y1.98%
Revenue growth 5Y0.58%
Sales Q2Q%2.61%
3.2 Future
The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 9.41% on average over the next years. This is quite good.
SUV is expected to show a small growth in Revenue. In the coming years, the Revenue will grow by 4.46% yearly.
EPS Next Y4.05%
EPS Next 2Y7.12%
EPS Next 3Y7.4%
EPS Next 5Y9.41%
Revenue Next Year2.12%
Revenue Next 2Y4.77%
Revenue Next 3Y5.07%
Revenue Next 5Y4.46%
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
SUV is valuated rather expensively with a Price/Earnings ratio of 24.35.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Earnings ratio of SUV indicates a somewhat cheap valuation: SUV is cheaper than 61.76% of the companies listed in the same industry.
SUV is valuated at similar levels of the S&P average when we compare the Price/Earnings ratio to 26.57, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
With a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 21.58, SUV is valued on the expensive side.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, SUV is valued a bit more expensive than the industry average as 64.71% of the companies are valued more cheaply.
When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of SUV to the average of the S&P500 Index (24.04), we can say SUV is valued inline with the index average.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 24.35 | ||
| Fwd PE | 21.58 |
4.2 Price Multiples
SUV's Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio is in line with the industry average.
The rest of the industry has a similar Price/Free Cash Flow ratio as SUV.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 17.34 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 14.59 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The high PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates SUV does not grow enough to justify the current Price/Earnings ratio.
The decent profitability rating of SUV may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)6.01
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y7.12%
EPS Next 3Y7.4%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
SUV has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 3.55%. Purely for dividend investing, there may be better candidates out there.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 2.41, SUV pays a bit more dividend than its industry peers.
Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 1.88, SUV pays a better dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.55% |
5.2 History
The dividend of SUV decreases each year by -18.67%.
Dividend Growth(5Y)-18.67%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
35.35% of the earnings are spent on dividend by SUV. This is a low number and sustainable payout ratio.
DP35.35%
EPS Next 2Y7.12%
EPS Next 3Y7.4%
FRA:SUV (12/23/2025, 7:00:00 PM)
97.64
+2.18 (+2.28%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorIndustrials
GICS IndustryGroupCommercial & Professional Services
GICS IndustryProfessional Services
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners46.89%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners0.07%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap19.02B
Revenue(TTM)6.88B
Net Income(TTM)628.00M
Analysts73.33
Price Target103.5 (6%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.55% |
Yearly Dividend1.19
Dividend Growth(5Y)-18.67%
DP35.35%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)1.35%
PT rev (3m)2.7%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)-0.68%
EPS NY rev (3m)-0.46%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)-0.13%
Revenue NY rev (3m)0.13%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 24.35 | ||
| Fwd PE | 21.58 | ||
| P/S | 2.57 | ||
| P/FCF | 17.34 | ||
| P/OCF | 14.14 | ||
| P/B | 27.55 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 14.59 |
EPS(TTM)4.01
EY4.11%
EPS(NY)4.52
Fwd EY4.63%
FCF(TTM)5.63
FCFY5.77%
OCF(TTM)6.91
OCFY7.07%
SpS38.05
BVpS3.54
TBVpS-8.1
PEG (NY)6.01
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number17.88
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.74% | ||
| ROE | 97.97% | ||
| ROCE | 22.3% | ||
| ROIC | 16.53% | ||
| ROICexc | 27.74% | ||
| ROICexgc | 177.49% | ||
| OM | 13.57% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 9.13% | ||
| GM | 93.97% | ||
| FCFM | 14.79% |
ROA(3y)8.35%
ROA(5y)8.15%
ROE(3y)93.2%
ROE(5y)75.95%
ROIC(3y)15.86%
ROIC(5y)15.11%
ROICexc(3y)19.08%
ROICexc(5y)20.22%
ROICexgc(3y)62.11%
ROICexgc(5y)71.23%
ROCE(3y)21.41%
ROCE(5y)20.39%
ROICexgc growth 3Y-19.18%
ROICexgc growth 5Y-4.92%
ROICexc growth 3Y-9.22%
ROICexc growth 5Y-5.54%
OM growth 3Y-3.92%
OM growth 5Y0.07%
PM growth 3Y-3.68%
PM growth 5Y-3.08%
GM growth 3Y-0.03%
GM growth 5Y-0.05%
F-Score7
Asset Turnover0.96
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 5.03 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 4.46 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 2.3 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 49.04% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 3.36% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 10.61 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 88.9% | ||
| Profit Quality | 162.1% | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.13 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.01 | ||
| Altman-Z | 3.61 |
F-Score7
WACC4.39%
ROIC/WACC3.77
Cap/Depr(3y)60.44%
Cap/Depr(5y)61.58%
Cap/Sales(3y)4.42%
Cap/Sales(5y)4.64%
Profit Quality(3y)144.89%
Profit Quality(5y)152.5%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)5.98%
EPS 3Y0.75%
EPS 5Y-46.67%
EPS Q2Q%3.59%
EPS Next Y4.05%
EPS Next 2Y7.12%
EPS Next 3Y7.4%
EPS Next 5Y9.41%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)3.12%
Revenue growth 3Y1.98%
Revenue growth 5Y0.58%
Sales Q2Q%2.61%
Revenue Next Year2.12%
Revenue Next 2Y4.77%
Revenue Next 3Y5.07%
Revenue Next 5Y4.46%
EBIT growth 1Y10.93%
EBIT growth 3Y-2.01%
EBIT growth 5Y0.65%
EBIT Next Year58.26%
EBIT Next 3Y22.42%
EBIT Next 5Y14.84%
FCF growth 1Y24.6%
FCF growth 3Y5.29%
FCF growth 5Y2.51%
OCF growth 1Y9.95%
OCF growth 3Y1.54%
OCF growth 5Y1.27%
SGS SA-REG / SUV.DE FAQ
What is the ChartMill fundamental rating of SGS SA-REG (SUV.DE) stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to SUV.DE.
What is the valuation status of SGS SA-REG (SUV.DE) stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 2 / 10 to SGS SA-REG (SUV.DE). This can be considered as Overvalued.
Can you provide the profitability details for SGS SA-REG?
SGS SA-REG (SUV.DE) has a profitability rating of 7 / 10.
What are the PE and PB ratios of SGS SA-REG (SUV.DE) stock?
The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for SGS SA-REG (SUV.DE) is 24.35 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 27.55.
What is the earnings growth outlook for SGS SA-REG?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of SGS SA-REG (SUV.DE) is expected to grow by 4.05% in the next year.