SENSATA TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING (ST)
GB00BFMBMT84 - Common Stock
ST gets a fundamental rating of 5 out of 10. The analysis compared the fundamentals against 86 industry peers in the Electrical Equipment industry. ST has only an average score on both its financial health and profitability. ST is valued quite cheap, while showing a decent growth score. This is a good combination!
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year ST was profitable.
In the past year ST had a positive cash flow from operations.
Of the past 5 years ST 4 years were profitable.
ST had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
ST has a better Return On Assets (-0.19%) than 67.86% of its industry peers.
ST's Return On Equity of -0.48% is fine compared to the rest of the industry. ST outperforms 69.05% of its industry peers.
Looking at the Return On Invested Capital, with a value of 6.35%, ST is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 71.43% of the companies in the same industry.
ST had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 6.43%. This is below the industry average of 10.40%.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | -0.19% | ||
| ROE | -0.48% | ||
| ROIC | 6.35% |
ROA(3y)2.57%
ROA(5y)2.79%
ROE(3y)7.2%
ROE(5y)7.73%
ROIC(3y)6.43%
ROIC(5y)6.41%
1.3 Margins
With a decent Operating Margin value of 13.50%, ST is doing good in the industry, outperforming 78.57% of the companies in the same industry.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of ST has declined.
ST has a better Gross Margin (30.79%) than 71.43% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of ST has declined.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 13.5% | ||
| PM (TTM) | N/A | ||
| GM | 30.79% |
OM growth 3Y1.57%
OM growth 5Y-6.07%
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-0.29%
GM growth 5Y-2.68%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) below the Cost of Capital (WACC), ST is destroying value.
The number of shares outstanding for ST has been reduced compared to 1 year ago.
ST has less shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
ST has a better debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
ST has an Altman-Z score of 2.23. This is not the best score and indicates that ST is in the grey zone with still only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
With a decent Altman-Z score value of 2.23, ST is doing good in the industry, outperforming 61.90% of the companies in the same industry.
ST has a debt to FCF ratio of 12.30. This is a negative value and a sign of low solvency as ST would need 12.30 years to pay back of all of its debts.
ST has a better Debt to FCF ratio (12.30) than 71.43% of its industry peers.
ST has a Debt/Equity ratio of 1.14. This is a high value indicating a heavy dependency on external financing.
ST has a Debt to Equity ratio of 1.14. This is in the lower half of the industry: ST underperforms 77.38% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.14 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 12.3 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.23 |
ROIC/WACC0.64
WACC9.92%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 2.64 indicates that ST has no problem at all paying its short term obligations.
ST has a Current ratio of 2.64. This is in the better half of the industry: ST outperforms 72.62% of its industry peers.
A Quick Ratio of 1.74 indicates that ST should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
Looking at the Quick ratio, with a value of 1.74, ST is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 67.86% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.64 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.74 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The Earnings Per Share has been growing slightly by 0.56% over the past year.
ST shows a decrease in Earnings Per Share. Measured over the last years, the EPS has been decreasing by -0.17% yearly.
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 0.27% in the past year.
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 2.86% on average over the past years.
EPS 1Y (TTM)0.56%
EPS 3Y17.59%
EPS 5Y-0.17%
EPS growth Q2Q-3.26%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.27%
Revenue growth 3Y10%
Revenue growth 5Y2.86%
Revenue growth Q2Q0.85%
3.2 Future
Based on estimates for the next years, ST will show a quite strong growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will grow by 9.07% on average per year.
Based on estimates for the next years, ST will show a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 5.67% on average per year.
EPS Next Y5.76%
EPS Next 2Y9.25%
EPS Next 3Y10.76%
EPS Next 5Y9.07%
Revenue Next Year2.14%
Revenue Next 2Y3.97%
Revenue Next 3Y5.16%
Revenue Next 5Y5.67%
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
ST is valuated reasonably with a Price/Earnings ratio of 11.87.
94.05% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than ST, based on the Price/Earnings ratio.
When comparing the Price/Earnings ratio of ST to the average of the S&P500 Index (28.11), we can say ST is valued rather cheaply.
ST is valuated reasonably with a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 9.86.
95.24% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than ST, based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio.
Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 20.39, ST is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 11.87 | ||
| Fwd PE | 9.86 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, ST is valued cheaper than 84.52% of the companies in the same industry.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio of ST indicates a rather cheap valuation: ST is cheaper than 82.14% of the companies listed in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 23.14 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 10.82 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The high PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates an expensive valuation of the company.
PEG (NY)2.06
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y9.25%
EPS Next 3Y10.76%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 1.17%, ST has a reasonable but not impressive dividend return.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 2.28, ST pays a better dividend. On top of this ST pays more dividend than 89.29% of the companies listed in the same industry.
With a Dividend Yield of 1.17, ST pays less dividend than the S&P500 average, which is at 2.40.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.17% |
5.2 History
ST has paid a dividend for less than 5 years, so there is no long track record yet.
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
The earnings of ST are negative and hence is the payout ratio. ST will probably not be able to sustain this dividend level.
DP-509.07%
EPS Next 2Y9.25%
EPS Next 3Y10.76%
SENSATA TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING
NYSE:ST (5/8/2024, 10:30:08 AM)
42.505
+0.52 (+1.23%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorIndustrials
GICS IndustryGroupCapital Goods
GICS IndustryElectrical Equipment
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners
Inst Owner Change
Ins Owners
Ins Owner Change
Market Cap6.40B
Analysts
Price Target
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.17% |
Dividend Growth(5Y)
DP
Div Incr Years
Div Non Decr Years
Ex-Date
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)
Avg EPS beat(2)
Min EPS beat(2)
Max EPS beat(2)
EPS beat(4)
Avg EPS beat(4)
Min EPS beat(4)
Max EPS beat(4)
EPS beat(8)
Avg EPS beat(8)
EPS beat(12)
Avg EPS beat(12)
EPS beat(16)
Avg EPS beat(16)
Revenue beat(2)
Avg Revenue beat(2)
Min Revenue beat(2)
Max Revenue beat(2)
Revenue beat(4)
Avg Revenue beat(4)
Min Revenue beat(4)
Max Revenue beat(4)
Revenue beat(8)
Avg Revenue beat(8)
Revenue beat(12)
Avg Revenue beat(12)
Revenue beat(16)
Avg Revenue beat(16)
PT rev (1m)
PT rev (3m)
EPS NQ rev (1m)
EPS NQ rev (3m)
EPS NY rev (1m)
EPS NY rev (3m)
Revenue NQ rev (1m)
Revenue NQ rev (3m)
Revenue NY rev (1m)
Revenue NY rev (3m)
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 11.87 | ||
| Fwd PE | 9.86 | ||
| P/S | |||
| P/FCF | |||
| P/OCF | |||
| P/B | |||
| P/tB | |||
| EV/EBITDA |
EPS(TTM)
EY
EPS(NY)
Fwd EY
FCF(TTM)
FCFY
OCF(TTM)
OCFY
SpS
BVpS
TBVpS
PEG (NY)2.06
PEG (5Y)N/A
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | -0.19% | ||
| ROE | -0.48% | ||
| ROCE | |||
| ROIC | |||
| ROICexc | |||
| ROICexgc | |||
| OM | 13.5% | ||
| PM (TTM) | N/A | ||
| GM | 30.79% | ||
| FCFM |
ROA(3y)
ROA(5y)
ROE(3y)
ROE(5y)
ROIC(3y)
ROIC(5y)
ROICexc(3y)
ROICexc(5y)
ROICexgc(3y)
ROICexgc(5y)
ROCE(3y)
ROCE(5y)
ROICexcg growth 3Y
ROICexcg growth 5Y
ROICexc growth 3Y
ROICexc growth 5Y
OM growth 3Y
OM growth 5Y
PM growth 3Y
PM growth 5Y
GM growth 3Y
GM growth 5Y
F-Score
Asset Turnover0.53
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.14 | ||
| Debt/FCF | |||
| Debt/EBITDA | |||
| Cap/Depr | |||
| Cap/Sales | |||
| Interest Coverage | |||
| Cash Conversion | |||
| Profit Quality | |||
| Current Ratio | 2.64 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.74 | ||
| Altman-Z |
F-Score
WACC
ROIC/WACC
Cap/Depr(3y)
Cap/Depr(5y)
Cap/Sales(3y)
Cap/Sales(5y)
Profit Quality(3y)
Profit Quality(5y)
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)0.56%
EPS 3Y17.59%
EPS 5Y
EPS growth Q2Q
EPS Next Y5.76%
EPS Next 2Y
EPS Next 3Y
EPS Next 5Y
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.27%
Revenue growth 3Y10%
Revenue growth 5Y
Revenue growth Q2Q
Revenue Next Year
Revenue Next 2Y
Revenue Next 3Y
Revenue Next 5Y
EBIT growth 1Y
EBIT growth 3Y
EBIT growth 5Y
EBIT Next Year
EBIT Next 3Y
EBIT Next 5Y
FCF growth 1Y
FCF growth 3Y
FCF growth 5Y
OCF growth 1Y
OCF growth 3Y
OCF growth 5Y