PROPETRO HOLDING CORP (PUMP) Stock Fundamental Analysis
USA - NYSE:PUMP - US74347M1080 - Common Stock
5.52 USD
+0.15 (+2.79%)
5.52 USD
0 (0%)
PUMP gets a fundamental rating of 3 out of 10. The analysis compared the fundamentals against 61 industry peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry. While PUMP seems to be doing ok healthwise, there are quite some concerns on its profitability. PUMP does not seem to be growing, but still is valued expensively.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
PUMP had positive earnings in the past year.
In the past year PUMP had a positive cash flow from operations.
The reported net income has been mixed in the past 5 years: PUMP reported negative net income in multiple years.
PUMP had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
With a Return On Assets value of -12.34%, PUMP is not doing good in the industry: 88.52% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
PUMP's Return On Equity of -18.41% is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. PUMP is outperformed by 80.33% of its industry peers.
The Return On Invested Capital of PUMP (2.69%) is worse than 75.41% of its industry peers.
PUMP had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 9.31%. This is in line with the industry average of 8.04%.
The last Return On Invested Capital (2.69%) for PUMP is well below the 3 year average (9.31%), which needs to be investigated, but indicates that PUMP had better years and this may not be a problem.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | -12.34% | ||
| ROE | -18.41% | ||
| ROIC | 2.69% |
ROA(3y)-1.78%
ROA(5y)-4.12%
ROE(3y)-2.7%
ROE(5y)-5.39%
ROIC(3y)9.31%
ROIC(5y)N/A
1.3 Margins
PUMP's Operating Margin of 2.65% is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. PUMP is outperformed by 78.69% of its industry peers.
PUMP's Operating Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
PUMP has a Gross Margin (24.79%) which is in line with its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of PUMP has declined.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 2.65% | ||
| PM (TTM) | N/A | ||
| GM | 24.79% |
OM growth 3YN/A
OM growth 5Y-24.01%
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y2.62%
GM growth 5Y-1.55%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is just above the Cost of Capital (WACC), so PUMP is still creating some value.
Compared to 1 year ago, PUMP has less shares outstanding
Compared to 5 years ago, PUMP has more shares outstanding
Compared to 1 year ago, PUMP has a worse debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
PUMP has an Altman-Z score of 2.05. This is not the best score and indicates that PUMP is in the grey zone with still only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
With a Altman-Z score value of 2.05, PUMP perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 57.38% of the companies in the same industry.
The Debt to FCF ratio of PUMP is 2.44, which is a good value as it means it would take PUMP, 2.44 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
Looking at the Debt to FCF ratio, with a value of 2.44, PUMP is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 70.49% of the companies in the same industry.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 0.07 indicates that PUMP is not too dependend on debt financing.
The Debt to Equity ratio of PUMP (0.07) is better than 77.05% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.07 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 2.44 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.05 |
ROIC/WACC0.29
WACC9.12%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 1.42 indicates that PUMP should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
PUMP's Current ratio of 1.42 is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. PUMP is outperformed by 68.85% of its industry peers.
PUMP has a Quick Ratio of 1.35. This is a normal value and indicates that PUMP is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
PUMP has a Quick ratio of 1.35. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: PUMP outperforms 44.26% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.42 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.35 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The earnings per share for PUMP have decreased strongly by -63.16% in the last year.
Measured over the past years, PUMP shows a very negative growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been decreasing by -29.68% on average per year.
The Revenue for PUMP has decreased by -10.91% in the past year. This is quite bad
PUMP shows a decrease in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been decreasing by -6.79% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-63.16%
EPS 3YN/A
EPS 5Y-29.68%
EPS Q2Q%-133.33%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-10.91%
Revenue growth 3Y18.2%
Revenue growth 5Y-6.79%
Sales Q2Q%-8.65%
3.2 Future
The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 21.14% on average over the next years. This is a very strong growth
Based on estimates for the next years, PUMP will show a decrease in Revenue. The Revenue will decrease by -1.76% on average per year.
EPS Next Y-188.93%
EPS Next 2Y-70.3%
EPS Next 3Y9.34%
EPS Next 5Y21.14%
Revenue Next Year-13.51%
Revenue Next 2Y-4.84%
Revenue Next 3Y1.84%
Revenue Next 5Y-1.76%
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
The Revenue growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio of 39.43, the valuation of PUMP can be described as expensive.
65.57% of the companies in the same industry are cheaper than PUMP, based on the Price/Earnings ratio.
When comparing the Price/Earnings ratio of PUMP to the average of the S&P500 Index (27.86), we can say PUMP is valued slightly more expensively.
PUMP is expected to report negative earnings next year, which makes the Forward Price/Earnings Ratio negative.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 39.43 | ||
| Fwd PE | N/A |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, PUMP is valued cheaply inside the industry as 98.36% of the companies are valued more expensively.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio of PUMP is on the same level as its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 16.45 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 2.4 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y-70.3%
EPS Next 3Y9.34%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
PUMP does not give a dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
5.52
+0.15 (+2.79%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorEnergy
GICS IndustryGroupEnergy
GICS IndustryEnergy Equipment & Services
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners86.24%
Inst Owner Change-0.09%
Ins Owners1.17%
Ins Owner Change3.45%
Market Cap573.91M
Analysts76.25
Price Target7.25 (31.34%)
Short Float %16.63%
Short Ratio4.64
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
Yearly DividendN/A
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
DPN/A
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)1
Avg EPS beat(2)-76.07%
Min EPS beat(2)-215.53%
Max EPS beat(2)63.4%
EPS beat(4)2
Avg EPS beat(4)13.2%
Min EPS beat(4)-215.53%
Max EPS beat(4)216.33%
EPS beat(8)4
Avg EPS beat(8)-4.26%
EPS beat(12)4
Avg EPS beat(12)-18.95%
EPS beat(16)5
Avg EPS beat(16)-211.19%
Revenue beat(2)1
Avg Revenue beat(2)-0.38%
Min Revenue beat(2)-3.32%
Max Revenue beat(2)2.56%
Revenue beat(4)1
Avg Revenue beat(4)-1.52%
Min Revenue beat(4)-3.32%
Max Revenue beat(4)2.56%
Revenue beat(8)3
Avg Revenue beat(8)-1.71%
Revenue beat(12)4
Avg Revenue beat(12)-1.72%
Revenue beat(16)6
Avg Revenue beat(16)-0.76%
PT rev (1m)-6.57%
PT rev (3m)-20.44%
EPS NQ rev (1m)-40.89%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-542.59%
EPS NY rev (1m)-645.64%
EPS NY rev (3m)-251.48%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)-4.06%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)-9.87%
Revenue NY rev (1m)-1.39%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-3.99%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 39.43 | ||
| Fwd PE | N/A | ||
| P/S | 0.42 | ||
| P/FCF | 16.45 | ||
| P/OCF | 3.16 | ||
| P/B | 0.7 | ||
| P/tB | 0.75 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 2.4 |
EPS(TTM)0.14
EY2.54%
EPS(NY)-0.24
Fwd EYN/A
FCF(TTM)0.34
FCFY6.08%
OCF(TTM)1.75
OCFY31.61%
SpS13.15
BVpS7.93
TBVpS7.34
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | -12.34% | ||
| ROE | -18.41% | ||
| ROCE | 3.63% | ||
| ROIC | 2.69% | ||
| ROICexc | 2.93% | ||
| ROICexgc | 3.14% | ||
| OM | 2.65% | ||
| PM (TTM) | N/A | ||
| GM | 24.79% | ||
| FCFM | 2.55% |
ROA(3y)-1.78%
ROA(5y)-4.12%
ROE(3y)-2.7%
ROE(5y)-5.39%
ROIC(3y)9.31%
ROIC(5y)N/A
ROICexc(3y)9.93%
ROICexc(5y)N/A
ROICexgc(3y)10.71%
ROICexgc(5y)N/A
ROCE(3y)12.55%
ROCE(5y)N/A
ROICexcg growth 3YN/A
ROICexcg growth 5Y-26.65%
ROICexc growth 3YN/A
ROICexc growth 5Y-27.57%
OM growth 3YN/A
OM growth 5Y-24.01%
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y2.62%
GM growth 5Y-1.55%
F-Score5
Asset Turnover1.11
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.07 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 2.44 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 0.26 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 75.54% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 10.72% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 250 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 78.81% | ||
| Profit Quality | N/A | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.42 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.35 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.05 |
F-Score5
WACC9.12%
ROIC/WACC0.29
Cap/Depr(3y)173.62%
Cap/Depr(5y)138.81%
Cap/Sales(3y)19.15%
Cap/Sales(5y)17.32%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-63.16%
EPS 3YN/A
EPS 5Y-29.68%
EPS Q2Q%-133.33%
EPS Next Y-188.93%
EPS Next 2Y-70.3%
EPS Next 3Y9.34%
EPS Next 5Y21.14%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-10.91%
Revenue growth 3Y18.2%
Revenue growth 5Y-6.79%
Sales Q2Q%-8.65%
Revenue Next Year-13.51%
Revenue Next 2Y-4.84%
Revenue Next 3Y1.84%
Revenue Next 5Y-1.76%
EBIT growth 1Y-71.02%
EBIT growth 3YN/A
EBIT growth 5Y-29.17%
EBIT Next Year314.69%
EBIT Next 3Y76.45%
EBIT Next 5Y57.05%
FCF growth 1Y334.22%
FCF growth 3Y115.44%
FCF growth 5YN/A
OCF growth 1Y-52.76%
OCF growth 3Y17.71%
OCF growth 5Y-11.14%