PROPETRO HOLDING CORP (PUMP)
US74347M1080 - Common Stock
Taking everything into account, PUMP scores 4 out of 10 in our fundamental rating. PUMP was compared to 65 industry peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry. PUMP has only an average score on both its financial health and profitability. PUMP is not valued too expensively and it also shows a decent growth rate.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year PUMP was profitable.
PUMP had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
The reported net income has been mixed in the past 5 years: PUMP reported negative net income in multiple years.
Each year in the past 5 years PUMP had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
PUMP has a Return On Assets (5.01%) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
The Return On Equity of PUMP (7.71%) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
PUMP has a Return On Invested Capital of 11.35%. This is in the better half of the industry: PUMP outperforms 78.46% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 5.01% | ||
| ROE | 7.71% | ||
| ROIC | 11.35% |
ROA(3y)0.28%
ROA(5y)0.4%
ROE(3y)0.74%
ROE(5y)1.35%
ROIC(3y)N/A
ROIC(5y)N/A
1.3 Margins
Looking at the Profit Margin, with a value of 4.77%, PUMP is in line with its industry, outperforming 55.38% of the companies in the same industry.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of PUMP has declined.
With a decent Operating Margin value of 10.96%, PUMP is doing good in the industry, outperforming 61.54% of the companies in the same industry.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of PUMP has declined.
PUMP has a Gross Margin (29.32%) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of PUMP has grown nicely.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 10.96% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 4.77% | ||
| GM | 29.32% |
OM growth 3YN/A
OM growth 5Y-6.14%
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5Y-12.43%
GM growth 3Y5.59%
GM growth 5Y3.73%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is just above the Cost of Capital (WACC), so PUMP is still creating some value.
Compared to 1 year ago, PUMP has less shares outstanding
Compared to 5 years ago, PUMP has more shares outstanding
The debt/assets ratio for PUMP is higher compared to a year ago.
2.2 Solvency
PUMP has an Altman-Z score of 2.72. This is not the best score and indicates that PUMP is in the grey zone with still only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
PUMP has a Altman-Z score of 2.72. This is in the better half of the industry: PUMP outperforms 67.69% of its industry peers.
The Debt to FCF ratio of PUMP is 1.03, which is an excellent value as it means it would take PUMP, only 1.03 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
PUMP's Debt to FCF ratio of 1.03 is amongst the best of the industry. PUMP outperforms 86.15% of its industry peers.
PUMP has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.07. This is a healthy value indicating a solid balance between debt and equity.
PUMP has a Debt to Equity ratio of 0.07. This is in the better half of the industry: PUMP outperforms 78.46% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.07 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 1.03 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.72 |
ROIC/WACC1.27
WACC8.91%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 1.18 indicates that PUMP should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
PUMP has a Current ratio of 1.18. This is amonst the worse of the industry: PUMP underperforms 86.15% of its industry peers.
A Quick Ratio of 1.12 indicates that PUMP should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
With a Quick ratio value of 1.12, PUMP is not doing good in the industry: 76.92% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.18 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.12 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The Earnings Per Share has been growing slightly by 7.14% over the past year.
The earnings per share for PUMP have been decreasing by -16.42% on average. This is quite bad
PUMP shows quite a strong growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 13.52%.
Measured over the past years, PUMP shows a decrease in Revenue. The Revenue has been decreasing by -0.89% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)7.14%
EPS 3YN/A
EPS 5Y-16.42%
EPS growth Q2Q-28%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)13.52%
Revenue growth 3Y27.36%
Revenue growth 5Y-0.89%
Revenue growth Q2Q-4.19%
3.2 Future
Based on estimates for the next years, PUMP will show a small growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will grow by 3.78% on average per year.
Based on estimates for the next years, PUMP will show a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 0.79% on average per year.
EPS Next Y-45.84%
EPS Next 2Y-11.5%
EPS Next 3Y3.78%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year0.78%
Revenue Next 2Y3.24%
Revenue Next 3Y0.79%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
The Price/Earnings ratio is 12.85, which indicates a correct valuation of PUMP.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Earnings ratio of PUMP indicates a somewhat cheap valuation: PUMP is cheaper than 70.77% of the companies listed in the same industry.
PUMP's Price/Earnings ratio indicates a rather cheap valuation when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 28.91.
The Price/Forward Earnings ratio is 15.01, which indicates a correct valuation of PUMP.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of PUMP indicates a slightly more expensive valuation: PUMP is more expensive than 63.08% of the companies listed in the same industry.
When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of PUMP to the average of the S&P500 Index (20.51), we can say PUMP is valued slightly cheaper.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 12.85 | ||
| Fwd PE | 15.01 |
4.2 Price Multiples
95.38% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than PUMP, based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio.
PUMP's Price/Free Cash Flow ratio is a bit cheaper when compared to the industry. PUMP is cheaper than 67.69% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 12.08 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 2.98 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y-11.5%
EPS Next 3Y3.78%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
PUMP does not give a dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
PROPETRO HOLDING CORP
NYSE:PUMP (5/15/2024, 7:04:18 PM)
After market: 9.59 -0.05 (-0.52%)9.64
-0.03 (-0.31%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorEnergy
GICS IndustryGroupEnergy
GICS IndustryEnergy Equipment & Services
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners
Inst Owner Change
Ins Owners
Ins Owner Change
Market Cap1.04B
Analysts
Price Target
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
Dividend Growth(5Y)
DP
Div Incr Years
Div Non Decr Years
Ex-Date
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)
Avg EPS beat(2)
Min EPS beat(2)
Max EPS beat(2)
EPS beat(4)
Avg EPS beat(4)
Min EPS beat(4)
Max EPS beat(4)
EPS beat(8)
Avg EPS beat(8)
EPS beat(12)
Avg EPS beat(12)
EPS beat(16)
Avg EPS beat(16)
Revenue beat(2)
Avg Revenue beat(2)
Min Revenue beat(2)
Max Revenue beat(2)
Revenue beat(4)
Avg Revenue beat(4)
Min Revenue beat(4)
Max Revenue beat(4)
Revenue beat(8)
Avg Revenue beat(8)
Revenue beat(12)
Avg Revenue beat(12)
Revenue beat(16)
Avg Revenue beat(16)
PT rev (1m)
PT rev (3m)
EPS NQ rev (1m)
EPS NQ rev (3m)
EPS NY rev (1m)
EPS NY rev (3m)
Revenue NQ rev (1m)
Revenue NQ rev (3m)
Revenue NY rev (1m)
Revenue NY rev (3m)
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 12.85 | ||
| Fwd PE | 15.01 | ||
| P/S | |||
| P/FCF | |||
| P/OCF | |||
| P/B | |||
| P/tB | |||
| EV/EBITDA |
EPS(TTM)
EY
EPS(NY)
Fwd EY
FCF(TTM)
FCFY
OCF(TTM)
OCFY
SpS
BVpS
TBVpS
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 5.01% | ||
| ROE | 7.71% | ||
| ROCE | |||
| ROIC | |||
| ROICexc | |||
| ROICexgc | |||
| OM | 10.96% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 4.77% | ||
| GM | 29.32% | ||
| FCFM |
ROA(3y)
ROA(5y)
ROE(3y)
ROE(5y)
ROIC(3y)
ROIC(5y)
ROICexc(3y)
ROICexc(5y)
ROICexgc(3y)
ROICexgc(5y)
ROCE(3y)
ROCE(5y)
ROICexcg growth 3Y
ROICexcg growth 5Y
ROICexc growth 3Y
ROICexc growth 5Y
OM growth 3Y
OM growth 5Y
PM growth 3Y
PM growth 5Y
GM growth 3Y
GM growth 5Y
F-Score
Asset Turnover1.05
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.07 | ||
| Debt/FCF | |||
| Debt/EBITDA | |||
| Cap/Depr | |||
| Cap/Sales | |||
| Interest Coverage | |||
| Cash Conversion | |||
| Profit Quality | |||
| Current Ratio | 1.18 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.12 | ||
| Altman-Z |
F-Score
WACC
ROIC/WACC
Cap/Depr(3y)
Cap/Depr(5y)
Cap/Sales(3y)
Cap/Sales(5y)
Profit Quality(3y)
Profit Quality(5y)
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)7.14%
EPS 3YN/A
EPS 5Y
EPS growth Q2Q
EPS Next Y-45.84%
EPS Next 2Y
EPS Next 3Y
EPS Next 5Y
Revenue 1Y (TTM)13.52%
Revenue growth 3Y27.36%
Revenue growth 5Y
Revenue growth Q2Q
Revenue Next Year
Revenue Next 2Y
Revenue Next 3Y
Revenue Next 5Y
EBIT growth 1Y
EBIT growth 3Y
EBIT growth 5Y
EBIT Next Year
EBIT Next 3Y
EBIT Next 5Y
FCF growth 1Y
FCF growth 3Y
FCF growth 5Y
OCF growth 1Y
OCF growth 3Y
OCF growth 5Y