PLDT INC-SPON ADR (PHI) Stock Fundamental Analysis
USA - NYSE:PHI - US69344D4088 - ADR
19.19 USD
+0.15 (+0.79%)
19.19 USD
0 (0%)
Overall PHI gets a fundamental rating of 5 out of 10. We evaluated PHI against 22 industry peers in the Wireless Telecommunication Services industry. While PHI belongs to the best of the industry regarding profitability, there are concerns on its financial health. PHI has a valuation in line with the averages, but it does not seem to be growing.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year PHI was profitable.
In the past year PHI had a positive cash flow from operations.
In the past 5 years PHI has always been profitable.
PHI had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
PHI's Return On Assets of 5.08% is fine compared to the rest of the industry. PHI outperforms 68.18% of its industry peers.
The Return On Equity of PHI (25.73%) is better than 86.36% of its industry peers.
The Return On Invested Capital of PHI (8.95%) is better than 77.27% of its industry peers.
PHI had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 5.82%. This is in line with the industry average of 5.81%.
The last Return On Invested Capital (8.95%) for PHI is above the 3 year average (5.82%), which is a sign of increasing profitability.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 5.08% | ||
| ROE | 25.73% | ||
| ROIC | 8.95% |
ROA(3y)3.73%
ROA(5y)3.92%
ROE(3y)20.92%
ROE(5y)21.02%
ROIC(3y)5.82%
ROIC(5y)6.78%
1.3 Margins
PHI has a better Profit Margin (14.61%) than 86.36% of its industry peers.
PHI's Profit Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
PHI's Operating Margin of 24.86% is amongst the best of the industry. PHI outperforms 90.91% of its industry peers.
PHI's Operating Margin has been stable in the last couple of years.
PHI's Gross Margin of 86.48% is amongst the best of the industry. PHI outperforms 90.91% of its industry peers.
PHI's Gross Margin has been stable in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 24.86% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 14.61% | ||
| GM | 86.48% |
OM growth 3Y1.9%
OM growth 5Y0.33%
PM growth 3Y2.8%
PM growth 5Y2.3%
GM growth 3Y-1.41%
GM growth 5Y-0.63%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), so PHI is creating value.
PHI has about the same amout of shares outstanding than it did 1 year ago.
PHI has about the same amout of shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
PHI has a worse debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
PHI has an Altman-Z score of 0.81. This is a bad value and indicates that PHI is not financially healthy and even has some risk of bankruptcy.
With a Altman-Z score value of 0.81, PHI is not doing good in the industry: 68.18% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
PHI has a debt to FCF ratio of 27.81. This is a negative value and a sign of low solvency as PHI would need 27.81 years to pay back of all of its debts.
PHI has a worse Debt to FCF ratio (27.81) than 72.73% of its industry peers.
PHI has a Debt/Equity ratio of 2.55. This is a high value indicating a heavy dependency on external financing.
PHI's Debt to Equity ratio of 2.55 is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. PHI is outperformed by 77.27% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 2.55 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 27.81 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.81 |
ROIC/WACC3.33
WACC2.69%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 0.37 indicates that PHI may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
PHI's Current ratio of 0.37 is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. PHI is outperformed by 90.91% of its industry peers.
PHI has a Quick Ratio of 0.37. This is a bad value and indicates that PHI is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
Looking at the Quick ratio, with a value of 0.35, PHI is doing worse than 90.91% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.37 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.35 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
PHI shows a small growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has grown by 4.23%.
The Earnings Per Share has been growing slightly by 5.18% on average over the past years.
Looking at the last year, PHI shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has grown by 2.02% in the last year.
Measured over the past years, PHI shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 5.09% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)4.23%
EPS 3Y5.37%
EPS 5Y5.18%
EPS Q2Q%3.61%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)2.02%
Revenue growth 3Y4.1%
Revenue growth 5Y5.09%
Sales Q2Q%2.46%
3.2 Future
PHI is expected to show a small growth in Earnings Per Share. In the coming years, the EPS will grow by 3.26% yearly.
The Revenue is expected to grow by 2.56% on average over the next years.
EPS Next Y-0.33%
EPS Next 2Y2.4%
EPS Next 3Y3.26%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year1.93%
Revenue Next 2Y2.5%
Revenue Next 3Y2.56%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
The Price/Earnings ratio is 7.00, which indicates a rather cheap valuation of PHI.
100.00% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than PHI, based on the Price/Earnings ratio.
Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio of 27.08, PHI is valued rather cheaply.
A Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 6.66 indicates a rather cheap valuation of PHI.
90.91% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than PHI, based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio.
When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of PHI to the average of the S&P500 Index (23.09), we can say PHI is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 7 | ||
| Fwd PE | 6.66 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio of PHI indicates a rather cheap valuation: PHI is cheaper than 86.36% of the companies listed in the same industry.
Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, PHI is valued a bit more expensive than 63.64% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 19.53 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 5.15 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
PHI has an outstanding profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)1.35
EPS Next 2Y2.4%
EPS Next 3Y3.26%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 8.56%, PHI is a good candidate for dividend investing.
PHI's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the industry average which is at 8.51. PHI pays more dividend than 95.45% of the companies in the same industry.
PHI's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 2.30.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 8.56% |
5.2 History
The dividend of PHI has a limited annual growth rate of 5.62%.
PHI has been paying a dividend for at least 10 years, so it has a reliable track record.
Dividend Growth(5Y)5.62%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
65.46% of the earnings are spent on dividend by PHI. This is not a sustainable payout ratio.
PHI's earnings are growing slower than its dividend. This means the dividend growth is not sustainable.
DP65.46%
EPS Next 2Y2.4%
EPS Next 3Y3.26%
19.19
+0.15 (+0.79%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorCommunication Services
GICS IndustryGroupTelecommunication Services
GICS IndustryWireless Telecommunication Services
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners5.28%
Inst Owner Change-0.85%
Ins Owners0.81%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap4.15B
Revenue(TTM)218.82B
Net Income(TTM)31.97B
Analysts80
Price Target29.1 (51.64%)
Short Float %0.27%
Short Ratio2.1
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 8.56% |
Yearly Dividend1.64
Dividend Growth(5Y)5.62%
DP65.46%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-Date
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)1
Avg EPS beat(2)0.94%
Min EPS beat(2)-3.5%
Max EPS beat(2)5.39%
EPS beat(4)1
Avg EPS beat(4)0.11%
Min EPS beat(4)-3.5%
Max EPS beat(4)5.39%
EPS beat(8)4
Avg EPS beat(8)4.11%
EPS beat(12)8
Avg EPS beat(12)11.51%
EPS beat(16)12
Avg EPS beat(16)12.61%
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)-1.27%
PT rev (3m)-4.32%
EPS NQ rev (1m)0%
EPS NQ rev (3m)0.13%
EPS NY rev (1m)0%
EPS NY rev (3m)-4.13%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)0%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-0.55%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 7 | ||
| Fwd PE | 6.66 | ||
| P/S | 1.12 | ||
| P/FCF | 19.53 | ||
| P/OCF | 3.15 | ||
| P/B | 1.96 | ||
| P/tB | 4.08 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 5.15 |
EPS(TTM)2.74
EY14.28%
EPS(NY)2.88
Fwd EY15.01%
FCF(TTM)0.98
FCFY5.12%
OCF(TTM)6.08
OCFY31.71%
SpS17.2
BVpS9.77
TBVpS4.71
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)1.35
Graham Number24.54
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 5.08% | ||
| ROE | 25.73% | ||
| ROCE | 11.94% | ||
| ROIC | 8.95% | ||
| ROICexc | 9.18% | ||
| ROICexgc | 10.74% | ||
| OM | 24.86% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 14.61% | ||
| GM | 86.48% | ||
| FCFM | 5.71% |
ROA(3y)3.73%
ROA(5y)3.92%
ROE(3y)20.92%
ROE(5y)21.02%
ROIC(3y)5.82%
ROIC(5y)6.78%
ROICexc(3y)6.02%
ROICexc(5y)7.44%
ROICexgc(3y)7.16%
ROICexgc(5y)9.04%
ROCE(3y)7.76%
ROCE(5y)9.05%
ROICexgc growth 3Y-2.13%
ROICexgc growth 5Y-4.68%
ROICexc growth 3Y-0.98%
ROICexc growth 5Y-2.62%
OM growth 3Y1.9%
OM growth 5Y0.33%
PM growth 3Y2.8%
PM growth 5Y2.3%
GM growth 3Y-1.41%
GM growth 5Y-0.63%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover0.35
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 2.55 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 27.81 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 2.82 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 111.87% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 29.66% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 4.4 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 68.86% | ||
| Profit Quality | 39.1% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.37 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.35 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.81 |
F-Score6
WACC2.69%
ROIC/WACC3.33
Cap/Depr(3y)117.23%
Cap/Depr(5y)139.41%
Cap/Sales(3y)38.48%
Cap/Sales(5y)42.54%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)4.23%
EPS 3Y5.37%
EPS 5Y5.18%
EPS Q2Q%3.61%
EPS Next Y-0.33%
EPS Next 2Y2.4%
EPS Next 3Y3.26%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)2.02%
Revenue growth 3Y4.1%
Revenue growth 5Y5.09%
Sales Q2Q%2.46%
Revenue Next Year1.93%
Revenue Next 2Y2.5%
Revenue Next 3Y2.56%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y25.95%
EBIT growth 3Y6.08%
EBIT growth 5Y5.44%
EBIT Next Year100.62%
EBIT Next 3Y28.53%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y157.85%
FCF growth 3YN/A
FCF growth 5YN/A
OCF growth 1Y-4.95%
OCF growth 3Y-3.86%
OCF growth 5Y3.33%
PLDT INC-SPON ADR / PHI FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for PLDT INC-SPON ADR?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to PHI.
Can you provide the valuation status for PLDT INC-SPON ADR?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 7 / 10 to PLDT INC-SPON ADR (PHI). This can be considered as Undervalued.
How profitable is PLDT INC-SPON ADR (PHI) stock?
PLDT INC-SPON ADR (PHI) has a profitability rating of 8 / 10.
What is the financial health of PLDT INC-SPON ADR (PHI) stock?
The financial health rating of PLDT INC-SPON ADR (PHI) is 1 / 10.
What is the earnings growth outlook for PLDT INC-SPON ADR?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of PLDT INC-SPON ADR (PHI) is expected to decline by -0.33% in the next year.