MATERIALISE NV-ADR (MTLS)
US57667T1007 - ADR
Overall MTLS gets a fundamental rating of 5 out of 10. We evaluated MTLS against 276 industry peers in the Software industry. MTLS has only an average score on both its financial health and profitability. MTLS is not valued too expensively and it also shows a decent growth rate.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
MTLS had positive earnings in the past year.
In the past year MTLS had a positive cash flow from operations.
In multiple years MTLS reported negative net income over the last 5 years.
Each year in the past 5 years MTLS had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
MTLS's Return On Assets of 1.67% is fine compared to the rest of the industry. MTLS outperforms 72.63% of its industry peers.
MTLS has a Return On Equity of 2.75%. This is in the better half of the industry: MTLS outperforms 74.09% of its industry peers.
MTLS's Return On Invested Capital of 0.88% is fine compared to the rest of the industry. MTLS outperforms 70.07% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.67% | ||
| ROE | 2.75% | ||
| ROIC | 0.88% |
ROA(3y)1.46%
ROA(5y)0.54%
ROE(3y)2.53%
ROE(5y)0.7%
ROIC(3y)N/A
ROIC(5y)N/A
1.3 Margins
MTLS's Profit Margin of 2.60% is fine compared to the rest of the industry. MTLS outperforms 72.63% of its industry peers.
MTLS's Profit Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
MTLS has a better Operating Margin (1.26%) than 68.98% of its industry peers.
MTLS's Operating Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
MTLS has a Gross Margin of 56.81%. This is in the lower half of the industry: MTLS underperforms 60.95% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of MTLS has remained more or less at the same level.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 1.26% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 2.6% | ||
| GM | 56.81% |
OM growth 3YN/A
OM growth 5Y7.27%
PM growth 3YN/A
PM growth 5Y10.07%
GM growth 3Y0.9%
GM growth 5Y0.44%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is below the Cost of Capital (WACC), so MTLS is destroying value.
Compared to 1 year ago, MTLS has about the same amount of shares outstanding.
The number of shares outstanding for MTLS has been increased compared to 5 years ago.
Compared to 1 year ago, MTLS has an improved debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
An Altman-Z score of 2.12 indicates that MTLS is not a great score, but indicates only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
The Altman-Z score of MTLS (2.12) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
The Debt to FCF ratio of MTLS is 7.69, which is on the high side as it means it would take MTLS, 7.69 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
MTLS has a Debt to FCF ratio (7.69) which is in line with its industry peers.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 0.14 indicates that MTLS is not too dependend on debt financing.
MTLS's Debt to Equity ratio of 0.14 is in line compared to the rest of the industry. MTLS outperforms 48.91% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.14 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 7.69 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.12 |
ROIC/WACC0.14
WACC6.42%
2.3 Liquidity
MTLS has a Current Ratio of 1.91. This is a normal value and indicates that MTLS is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
MTLS has a Current ratio of 1.91. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: MTLS outperforms 55.84% of its industry peers.
A Quick Ratio of 1.75 indicates that MTLS should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
With a Quick ratio value of 1.75, MTLS perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 52.19% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.91 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.75 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
MTLS shows a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has been growing by 476.34%, which is quite impressive.
The Earnings Per Share has been growing by 12.89% on average over the past years. This is quite good.
MTLS shows a small growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 3.64%.
Measured over the past years, MTLS shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 6.76% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)476.34%
EPS 3YN/A
EPS 5Y12.89%
EPS growth Q2Q8.78%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)3.64%
Revenue growth 3Y14.55%
Revenue growth 5Y6.76%
Revenue growth Q2Q-3.42%
3.2 Future
Based on estimates for the next years, MTLS will show a very strong growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will grow by 49.45% on average per year.
The Revenue is expected to grow by 4.94% on average over the next years.
EPS Next Y63.82%
EPS Next 2Y58.23%
EPS Next 3Y49.45%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year3.56%
Revenue Next 2Y6.26%
Revenue Next 3Y7.06%
Revenue Next 5Y4.94%
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
The Revenue growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
MTLS is valuated quite expensively with a Price/Earnings ratio of 43.92.
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, MTLS is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 66.06% of the companies are valued more expensively.
Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio of 28.06, MTLS is valued quite expensively.
With a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 17.85, MTLS is valued on the expensive side.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, MTLS is valued cheaper than 85.40% of the companies in the same industry.
MTLS's Price/Forward Earnings ratio indicates a similar valuation than the S&P500 average which is at 20.72.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 43.92 | ||
| Fwd PE | 17.85 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, MTLS is valued cheaply inside the industry as 94.89% of the companies are valued more expensively.
68.25% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than MTLS, based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 37.4 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 9.08 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
MTLS's low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
The decent profitability rating of MTLS may justify a higher PE ratio.
A more expensive valuation may be justified as MTLS's earnings are expected to grow with 49.45% in the coming years.
PEG (NY)0.69
PEG (5Y)3.41
EPS Next 2Y58.23%
EPS Next 3Y49.45%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
MTLS does not give a dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
MATERIALISE NV-ADR
NASDAQ:MTLS (5/2/2024, 4:20:01 PM)
5.27
-0.09 (-1.68%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorInformation Technology
GICS IndustryGroupSoftware & Services
GICS IndustrySoftware
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners
Inst Owner Change
Ins Owners
Ins Owner Change
Market Cap311.28M
Analysts
Price Target
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
Dividend Growth(5Y)
DP
Div Incr Years
Div Non Decr Years
Ex-Date
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)
Avg EPS beat(2)
Min EPS beat(2)
Max EPS beat(2)
EPS beat(4)
Avg EPS beat(4)
Min EPS beat(4)
Max EPS beat(4)
EPS beat(8)
Avg EPS beat(8)
EPS beat(12)
Avg EPS beat(12)
EPS beat(16)
Avg EPS beat(16)
Revenue beat(2)
Avg Revenue beat(2)
Min Revenue beat(2)
Max Revenue beat(2)
Revenue beat(4)
Avg Revenue beat(4)
Min Revenue beat(4)
Max Revenue beat(4)
Revenue beat(8)
Avg Revenue beat(8)
Revenue beat(12)
Avg Revenue beat(12)
Revenue beat(16)
Avg Revenue beat(16)
PT rev (1m)
PT rev (3m)
EPS NQ rev (1m)
EPS NQ rev (3m)
EPS NY rev (1m)
EPS NY rev (3m)
Revenue NQ rev (1m)
Revenue NQ rev (3m)
Revenue NY rev (1m)
Revenue NY rev (3m)
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 43.92 | ||
| Fwd PE | 17.85 | ||
| P/S | |||
| P/FCF | |||
| P/OCF | |||
| P/B | |||
| P/tB | |||
| EV/EBITDA |
EPS(TTM)
EY
EPS(NY)
Fwd EY
FCF(TTM)
FCFY
OCF(TTM)
OCFY
SpS
BVpS
TBVpS
PEG (NY)0.69
PEG (5Y)3.41
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.67% | ||
| ROE | 2.75% | ||
| ROCE | |||
| ROIC | |||
| ROICexc | |||
| ROICexgc | |||
| OM | 1.26% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 2.6% | ||
| GM | 56.81% | ||
| FCFM |
ROA(3y)
ROA(5y)
ROE(3y)
ROE(5y)
ROIC(3y)
ROIC(5y)
ROICexc(3y)
ROICexc(5y)
ROICexgc(3y)
ROICexgc(5y)
ROCE(3y)
ROCE(5y)
ROICexcg growth 3Y
ROICexcg growth 5Y
ROICexc growth 3Y
ROICexc growth 5Y
OM growth 3Y
OM growth 5Y
PM growth 3Y
PM growth 5Y
GM growth 3Y
GM growth 5Y
F-Score
Asset Turnover0.64
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.14 | ||
| Debt/FCF | |||
| Debt/EBITDA | |||
| Cap/Depr | |||
| Cap/Sales | |||
| Interest Coverage | |||
| Cash Conversion | |||
| Profit Quality | |||
| Current Ratio | 1.91 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 1.75 | ||
| Altman-Z |
F-Score
WACC
ROIC/WACC
Cap/Depr(3y)
Cap/Depr(5y)
Cap/Sales(3y)
Cap/Sales(5y)
Profit Quality(3y)
Profit Quality(5y)
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)476.34%
EPS 3YN/A
EPS 5Y
EPS growth Q2Q
EPS Next Y63.82%
EPS Next 2Y
EPS Next 3Y
EPS Next 5Y
Revenue 1Y (TTM)3.64%
Revenue growth 3Y14.55%
Revenue growth 5Y
Revenue growth Q2Q
Revenue Next Year
Revenue Next 2Y
Revenue Next 3Y
Revenue Next 5Y
EBIT growth 1Y
EBIT growth 3Y
EBIT growth 5Y
EBIT Next Year
EBIT Next 3Y
EBIT Next 5Y
FCF growth 1Y
FCF growth 3Y
FCF growth 5Y
OCF growth 1Y
OCF growth 3Y
OCF growth 5Y