ARCELORMITTAL-NY REGISTERED (MT) Stock Fundamental Analysis

USA • New York Stock Exchange • NYSE:MT • US03938L2034

53.97 USD
-1.82 (-3.26%)
At close: Jan 30, 2026
53.97 USD
0 (0%)
After Hours: 1/30/2026, 8:07:33 PM
Fundamental Rating

4

MT gets a fundamental rating of 4 out of 10. The analysis compared the fundamentals against 154 industry peers in the Metals & Mining industry. There are concerns on the financial health of MT while its profitability can be described as average. MT is valued quite cheap, but it does not seem to be growing.


Dividend Valuation Growth Profitability Health

5

1. Profitability

1.1 Basic Checks

  • MT had positive earnings in the past year.
  • In the past year MT had a positive cash flow from operations.
  • Of the past 5 years MT 4 years were profitable.
  • In the past 5 years MT always reported a positive cash flow from operatings.
MT Yearly Net Income VS EBIT VS OCF VS FCFMT Yearly Net Income VS EBIT VS OCF VS FCFYearly Net Income VS EBIT VS OCF VS FCF 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 5B 10B 15B

1.2 Ratios

  • The Return On Assets of MT (2.62%) is better than 64.94% of its industry peers.
  • MT has a better Return On Equity (4.73%) than 64.94% of its industry peers.
  • The Return On Invested Capital of MT (2.71%) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
  • MT had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 5.89%. This is below the industry average of 10.33%.
Industry RankSector Rank
ROA 2.62%
ROE 4.73%
ROIC 2.71%
ROA(3y)4.11%
ROA(5y)5.59%
ROE(3y)7.31%
ROE(5y)10.09%
ROIC(3y)5.89%
ROIC(5y)6.85%
MT Yearly ROA, ROE, ROICMT Yearly ROA, ROE, ROICYearly ROA, ROE, ROIC 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 10 20 30

1.3 Margins

  • MT has a better Profit Margin (4.23%) than 66.23% of its industry peers.
  • In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of MT has declined.
  • MT has a Operating Margin (5.21%) which is in line with its industry peers.
  • MT's Operating Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
  • MT has a Gross Margin (10.02%) which is in line with its industry peers.
  • MT's Gross Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
Industry RankSector Rank
OM 5.21%
PM (TTM) 4.23%
GM 10.02%
OM growth 3Y-35.65%
OM growth 5Y25.94%
PM growth 3Y-52.12%
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-26.65%
GM growth 5Y13.62%
MT Yearly Profit, Operating, Gross MarginsMT Yearly Profit, Operating, Gross MarginsYearly Profit, Operating, Gross Margins 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 5 10 15 20

3

2. Health

2.1 Basic Checks

  • MT has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is below the Cost of Capital (WACC), which means it is destroying value.
  • The number of shares outstanding for MT has been reduced compared to 1 year ago.
  • Compared to 5 years ago, MT has less shares outstanding
  • MT has a worse debt/assets ratio than last year.
MT Yearly Shares OutstandingMT Yearly Shares OutstandingYearly Shares Outstanding 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 200M 400M 600M 800M 1B
MT Yearly Total Debt VS Total AssetsMT Yearly Total Debt VS Total AssetsYearly Total Debt VS Total Assets 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 20B 40B 60B 80B

2.2 Solvency

  • MT has a debt to FCF ratio of 323.22. This is a negative value and a sign of low solvency as MT would need 323.22 years to pay back of all of its debts.
  • MT has a Debt to FCF ratio (323.22) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
  • A Debt/Equity ratio of 0.19 indicates that MT is not too dependend on debt financing.
  • MT has a Debt to Equity ratio of 0.19. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: MT outperforms 50.00% of its industry peers.
Industry RankSector Rank
Debt/Equity 0.19
Debt/FCF 323.22
Altman-Z N/A
ROIC/WACC0.3
WACC8.93%
MT Yearly LT Debt VS Equity VS FCFMT Yearly LT Debt VS Equity VS FCFYearly LT Debt VS Equity VS FCF 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 10B 20B 30B 40B 50B

2.3 Liquidity

  • MT has a Current Ratio of 1.39. This is a normal value and indicates that MT is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
  • The Current ratio of MT (1.39) is worse than 73.38% of its industry peers.
  • MT has a Quick Ratio of 1.39. This is a bad value and indicates that MT is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
  • The Quick ratio of MT (0.58) is worse than 85.71% of its industry peers.
Industry RankSector Rank
Current Ratio 1.39
Quick Ratio 0.58
MT Yearly Current Assets VS Current LiabilitesMT Yearly Current Assets VS Current LiabilitesYearly Current Assets VS Current Liabilites 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 10B 20B 30B

3

3. Growth

3.1 Past

  • MT shows a slight negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has decreased by -2.78%.
  • MT shows a very negative growth in Earnings Per Share. Measured over the last years, the EPS has been decreasing by -39.64% yearly.
  • MT shows a decrease in Revenue. In the last year, the revenue decreased by -1.90%.
  • Measured over the past years, MT shows a decrease in Revenue. The Revenue has been decreasing by -2.43% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-2.78%
EPS 3Y-39.64%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%-1.59%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-1.9%
Revenue growth 3Y-6.57%
Revenue growth 5Y-2.43%
Sales Q2Q%3.03%

3.2 Future

  • The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 27.53% on average over the next years. This is a very strong growth
  • MT is expected to show a small growth in Revenue. In the coming years, the Revenue will grow by 2.09% yearly.
EPS Next Y25.82%
EPS Next 2Y31.04%
EPS Next 3Y27.53%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year-1.71%
Revenue Next 2Y2.99%
Revenue Next 3Y2.89%
Revenue Next 5Y2.09%

3.3 Evolution

  • The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
  • When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
MT Yearly Revenue VS EstimatesMT Yearly Revenue VS EstimatesYearly Revenue VS Estimates 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 20B 40B 60B 80B
MT Yearly EPS VS EstimatesMT Yearly EPS VS EstimatesYearly EPS VS Estimates 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 0 5 10

7

4. Valuation

4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio

  • With a Price/Earnings ratio of 15.42, MT is valued correctly.
  • Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, MT is valued cheaply inside the industry as 94.81% of the companies are valued more expensively.
  • When comparing the Price/Earnings ratio of MT to the average of the S&P500 Index (28.30), we can say MT is valued slightly cheaper.
  • A Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 10.69 indicates a reasonable valuation of MT.
  • Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, MT is valued cheaper than 86.36% of the companies in the same industry.
  • MT is valuated cheaply when we compare the Price/Forward Earnings ratio to 25.57, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
Industry RankSector Rank
PE 15.42
Fwd PE 10.69
MT Price Earnings VS Forward Price EarningsMT Price Earnings VS Forward Price Earnings ChartPrice Earnings - Forward Price Earnings PE FPE 10 20 30

4.2 Price Multiples

  • 90.26% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than MT, based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio.
  • MT's Price/Free Cash Flow is on the same level as the industry average.
Industry RankSector Rank
P/FCF 909.28
EV/EBITDA 8.53
MT Per share dataMT EPS, Sales, OCF, FCF, BookValue per sharePer Share Data Per Share 20 40 60

4.3 Compensation for Growth

  • The low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
  • MT's earnings are expected to grow with 27.53% in the coming years. This may justify a more expensive valuation.
PEG (NY)0.6
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y31.04%
EPS Next 3Y27.53%

4

5. Dividend

5.1 Amount

  • With a yearly dividend of 0.96%, MT is not a good candidate for dividend investing.
  • MT's Dividend Yield is a higher than the industry average which is at 1.02.
  • With a Dividend Yield of 0.96, MT pays less dividend than the S&P500 average, which is at 1.82.
Industry RankSector Rank
Dividend Yield 0.96%

5.2 History

  • On average, the dividend of MT grows each year by 37.57%, which is quite nice.
  • MT has been paying a dividend for at least 10 years, so it has a reliable track record.
  • The dividend of MT decreased recently.
Dividend Growth(5Y)37.57%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
MT Yearly Dividends per shareMT Yearly Dividends per shareYearly Dividends per share 2018 2019 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 1 2 3 4

5.3 Sustainability

  • MT pays out 15.59% of its income as dividend. This is a sustainable payout ratio.
  • MT's earnings are growing slower than its dividend. This means the dividend growth is not sustainable.
DP15.59%
EPS Next 2Y31.04%
EPS Next 3Y27.53%
MT Yearly Income VS Free CF VS DividendMT Yearly Income VS Free CF VS DividendYearly Income VS Free CF VS Dividend 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 5B 10B
MT Dividend Payout.MT Dividend Payout, showing the Payout Ratio.MT Dividend Payout.PayoutRetained Earnings

ARCELORMITTAL-NY REGISTERED / MT FAQ

What is the fundamental rating for MT stock?

ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 4 / 10 to MT.


What is the valuation status for MT stock?

ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 7 / 10 to ARCELORMITTAL-NY REGISTERED (MT). This can be considered as Undervalued.


How profitable is ARCELORMITTAL-NY REGISTERED (MT) stock?

ARCELORMITTAL-NY REGISTERED (MT) has a profitability rating of 5 / 10.


What are the PE and PB ratios of ARCELORMITTAL-NY REGISTERED (MT) stock?

The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for ARCELORMITTAL-NY REGISTERED (MT) is 15.42 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 0.77.


Is the dividend of ARCELORMITTAL-NY REGISTERED sustainable?

The dividend rating of ARCELORMITTAL-NY REGISTERED (MT) is 4 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 15.59%.