ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - Euronext Milan - BIT:MN - IT0001469383 - Common Stock
2.065 EUR
+0.02 (+1.23%)
MN gets a fundamental rating of 6 out of 10. The analysis compared the fundamentals against 70 industry peers in the Media industry. While MN has a great profitability rating, there are some minor concerns on its financial health. MN is cheap, but on the other hand it scores bad on growth. Finally MN also has an excellent dividend rating.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
MN had positive earnings in the past year.
MN had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
Each year in the past 5 years MN has been profitable.
MN had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
Looking at the Return On Assets, with a value of 8.78%, MN belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 95.65% of the companies in the same industry.
MN's Return On Equity of 34.27% is amongst the best of the industry. MN outperforms 92.75% of its industry peers.
MN has a Return On Invested Capital of 19.38%. This is amongst the best in the industry. MN outperforms 97.10% of its industry peers.
Measured over the past 3 years, the Average Return On Invested Capital for MN is above the industry average of 7.99%.
The last Return On Invested Capital (19.38%) for MN is above the 3 year average (11.34%), which is a sign of increasing profitability.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.78% | ||
| ROE | 34.27% | ||
| ROIC | 19.38% |
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
1.3 Margins
MN has a better Profit Margin (6.75%) than 75.36% of its industry peers.
MN's Profit Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
Looking at the Operating Margin, with a value of 10.52%, MN is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 69.57% of the companies in the same industry.
MN's Operating Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
MN's Gross Margin of 34.59% is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. MN is outperformed by 65.22% of its industry peers.
MN's Gross Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 10.52% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 6.75% | ||
| GM | 34.59% |
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), MN is creating value.
Compared to 1 year ago, MN has about the same amount of shares outstanding.
The number of shares outstanding for MN has been increased compared to 5 years ago.
The debt/assets ratio for MN is higher compared to a year ago.
2.2 Solvency
MN has an Altman-Z score of 2.14. This is not the best score and indicates that MN is in the grey zone with still only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
MN has a Altman-Z score of 2.14. This is in the better half of the industry: MN outperforms 73.91% of its industry peers.
The Debt to FCF ratio of MN is 3.46, which is a good value as it means it would take MN, 3.46 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
Looking at the Debt to FCF ratio, with a value of 3.46, MN is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 69.57% of the companies in the same industry.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 0.69 indicates that MN is somewhat dependend on debt financing.
With a Debt to Equity ratio value of 0.69, MN perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 56.52% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.69 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.46 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.14 |
ROIC/WACC3.24
WACC5.98%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 0.97 indicates that MN may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
Looking at the Current ratio, with a value of 0.97, MN is in line with its industry, outperforming 53.62% of the companies in the same industry.
MN has a Quick Ratio of 0.97. This is a bad value and indicates that MN is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
The Quick ratio of MN (0.62) is worse than 78.26% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.97 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.62 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The earnings per share for MN have decreased by -8.79% in the last year.
MN shows quite a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. Measured over the last years, the EPS has been growing by 15.47% yearly.
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 0.49% in the past year.
Measured over the past years, MN shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 1.10% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%
3.2 Future
The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 1.31% on average over the next years.
The Revenue is expected to grow by 0.71% on average over the next years.
EPS Next Y0.81%
EPS Next 2Y1.21%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year1.23%
Revenue Next 2Y1.5%
Revenue Next 3Y1.48%
Revenue Next 5Y0.71%
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
The Revenue growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
MN is valuated cheaply with a Price/Earnings ratio of 5.74.
92.75% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than MN, based on the Price/Earnings ratio.
When comparing the Price/Earnings ratio of MN to the average of the S&P500 Index (26.15), we can say MN is valued rather cheaply.
With a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 7.97, the valuation of MN can be described as very cheap.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of MN indicates a somewhat cheap valuation: MN is cheaper than 75.36% of the companies listed in the same industry.
The average S&P500 Price/Forward Earnings ratio is at 36.12. MN is valued rather cheaply when compared to this.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 5.74 | ||
| Fwd PE | 7.97 |
4.2 Price Multiples
MN's Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. MN is cheaper than 85.51% of the companies in the same industry.
Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, MN is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 71.01% of the companies are valued more expensively.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 6.42 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 3.79 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The high PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates an expensive valuation of the company.
MN has an outstanding profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)7.04
PEG (5Y)0.37
EPS Next 2Y1.21%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 6.73%, MN is a good candidate for dividend investing.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 5.90, MN pays a better dividend. On top of this MN pays more dividend than 89.86% of the companies listed in the same industry.
MN's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 2.41.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.73% |
5.2 History
The dividend of MN decreases each year by -6.82%.
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
MN pays out 19.05% of its income as dividend. This is a sustainable payout ratio.
DP19.05%
EPS Next 2Y1.21%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
BIT:MN (11/27/2025, 7:00:00 PM)
2.065
+0.02 (+1.23%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorCommunication Services
GICS IndustryGroupMedia & Entertainment
GICS IndustryMedia
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners26.29%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners53.3%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap539.91M
Revenue(TTM)1.42B
Net Income(TTM)95.81M
Analysts85
Price Target2.78 (34.62%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.73% |
Yearly Dividend0.12
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
DP19.05%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)-0.91%
PT rev (3m)-0.91%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)0.34%
EPS NY rev (3m)-4.62%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)-0.74%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-0.25%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 5.74 | ||
| Fwd PE | 7.97 | ||
| P/S | 0.38 | ||
| P/FCF | 6.42 | ||
| P/OCF | 5.23 | ||
| P/B | 1.93 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 3.79 |
EPS(TTM)0.36
EY17.43%
EPS(NY)0.26
Fwd EY12.54%
FCF(TTM)0.32
FCFY15.58%
OCF(TTM)0.39
OCFY19.11%
SpS5.43
BVpS1.07
TBVpS-0.44
PEG (NY)7.04
PEG (5Y)0.37
Graham Number2.94
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.78% | ||
| ROE | 34.27% | ||
| ROCE | 25.55% | ||
| ROIC | 19.38% | ||
| ROICexc | 20.09% | ||
| ROICexgc | 66.52% | ||
| OM | 10.52% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 6.75% | ||
| GM | 34.59% | ||
| FCFM | 5.92% |
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
ROICexc(3y)12.8%
ROICexc(5y)11.61%
ROICexgc(3y)52.6%
ROICexgc(5y)44.45%
ROCE(3y)14.93%
ROCE(5y)12.88%
ROICexgc growth 3Y21.82%
ROICexgc growth 5Y18.04%
ROICexc growth 3Y17.34%
ROICexc growth 5Y2.38%
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover1.3
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.69 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.46 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 0.91 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 29.53% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 1.34% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 51.7 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 48.24% | ||
| Profit Quality | 87.81% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.97 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.62 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.14 |
F-Score6
WACC5.98%
ROIC/WACC3.24
Cap/Depr(3y)19.72%
Cap/Depr(5y)13.93%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.34%
Cap/Sales(5y)0.97%
Profit Quality(3y)177.69%
Profit Quality(5y)503.09%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
EPS Next Y0.81%
EPS Next 2Y1.21%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%
Revenue Next Year1.23%
Revenue Next 2Y1.5%
Revenue Next 3Y1.48%
Revenue Next 5Y0.71%
EBIT growth 1Y-5.07%
EBIT growth 3Y21.04%
EBIT growth 5Y7.37%
EBIT Next Year68.82%
EBIT Next 3Y19.92%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-15.02%
FCF growth 3Y4.95%
FCF growth 5Y6.26%
OCF growth 1Y-8.3%
OCF growth 3Y8.91%
OCF growth 5Y7.93%
ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE / MN.MI FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 6 / 10 to MN.MI.
What is the valuation status of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 7 / 10 to ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI). This can be considered as Undervalued.
How profitable is ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?
ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) has a profitability rating of 8 / 10.
What is the earnings growth outlook for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is expected to grow by 0.81% in the next year.
How sustainable is the dividend of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?
The dividend rating of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is 7 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 19.05%.