ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - BIT:MN - IT0001469383 - Common Stock
2.085 EUR
0 (-0.24%)
Overall MN gets a fundamental rating of 6 out of 10. We evaluated MN against 62 industry peers in the Media industry. MN scores excellent on profitability, but there are some minor concerns on its financial health. A decent growth rate in combination with a cheap valuation! Better keep an eye on MN. MN also has an excellent dividend rating.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year MN was profitable.
MN had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
In the past 5 years MN has always been profitable.
MN had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
With an excellent Return On Assets value of 8.78%, MN belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming 95.08% of the companies in the same industry.
The Return On Equity of MN (34.27%) is better than 91.80% of its industry peers.
The Return On Invested Capital of MN (19.38%) is better than 96.72% of its industry peers.
Measured over the past 3 years, the Average Return On Invested Capital for MN is above the industry average of 7.68%.
The 3 year average ROIC (11.34%) for MN is below the current ROIC(19.38%), indicating increased profibility in the last year.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.78% | ||
| ROE | 34.27% | ||
| ROIC | 19.38% |
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
1.3 Margins
The Profit Margin of MN (6.75%) is better than 77.05% of its industry peers.
MN's Profit Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
MN has a better Operating Margin (10.52%) than 70.49% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of MN has grown nicely.
With a Gross Margin value of 34.59%, MN is not doing good in the industry: 70.49% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of MN has grown nicely.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 10.52% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 6.75% | ||
| GM | 34.59% |
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), so MN is creating value.
The number of shares outstanding for MN remains at a similar level compared to 1 year ago.
The number of shares outstanding for MN has been increased compared to 5 years ago.
Compared to 1 year ago, MN has a worse debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
An Altman-Z score of 2.15 indicates that MN is not a great score, but indicates only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
MN has a better Altman-Z score (2.15) than 73.77% of its industry peers.
MN has a debt to FCF ratio of 3.46. This is a good value and a sign of high solvency as MN would need 3.46 years to pay back of all of its debts.
MN's Debt to FCF ratio of 3.46 is fine compared to the rest of the industry. MN outperforms 68.85% of its industry peers.
A Debt/Equity ratio of 0.69 indicates that MN is somewhat dependend on debt financing.
MN's Debt to Equity ratio of 0.69 is in line compared to the rest of the industry. MN outperforms 57.38% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.69 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.46 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.15 |
ROIC/WACC3.19
WACC6.08%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 0.97 indicates that MN may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
Looking at the Current ratio, with a value of 0.97, MN is in line with its industry, outperforming 52.46% of the companies in the same industry.
MN has a Quick Ratio of 0.97. This is a bad value and indicates that MN is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
MN has a Quick ratio of 0.62. This is amonst the worse of the industry: MN underperforms 80.33% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.97 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.62 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
MN shows a slight negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has decreased by -8.79%.
Measured over the past years, MN shows a quite strong growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been growing by 15.47% on average per year.
MN shows a small growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 0.49%.
MN shows a small growth in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been growing by 1.10% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%
3.2 Future
MN is expected to show a small growth in Earnings Per Share. In the coming years, the EPS will grow by 1.97% yearly.
MN is expected to show a small growth in Revenue. In the coming years, the Revenue will grow by 3.11% yearly.
EPS Next Y0.48%
EPS Next 2Y1.98%
EPS Next 3Y1.97%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year1.98%
Revenue Next 2Y1.62%
Revenue Next 3Y1.42%
Revenue Next 5Y3.11%
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
The Price/Earnings ratio is 5.79, which indicates a rather cheap valuation of MN.
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, MN is valued cheaply inside the industry as 93.44% of the companies are valued more expensively.
When comparing the Price/Earnings ratio of MN to the average of the S&P500 Index (26.10), we can say MN is valued rather cheaply.
MN is valuated cheaply with a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 7.93.
75.41% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than MN, based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio.
MN's Price/Forward Earnings ratio indicates a rather cheap valuation when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 22.52.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 5.79 | ||
| Fwd PE | 7.93 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, MN is valued cheaper than 80.33% of the companies in the same industry.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio of MN indicates a somewhat cheap valuation: MN is cheaper than 72.13% of the companies listed in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 6.48 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 3.82 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The high PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates MN does not grow enough to justify the current Price/Earnings ratio.
MN has an outstanding profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)12.15
PEG (5Y)0.37
EPS Next 2Y1.98%
EPS Next 3Y1.97%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
MN has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 6.54%, which is a nice return.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 6.39, MN pays a better dividend. On top of this MN pays more dividend than 91.80% of the companies listed in the same industry.
Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 2.35, MN pays a better dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.54% |
5.2 History
The dividend of MN decreases each year by -6.82%.
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
MN pays out 19.05% of its income as dividend. This is a sustainable payout ratio.
DP19.05%
EPS Next 2Y1.98%
EPS Next 3Y1.97%
BIT:MN (10/31/2025, 7:00:00 PM)
2.085
0 (-0.24%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorCommunication Services
GICS IndustryGroupMedia & Entertainment
GICS IndustryMedia
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners26.29%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners53.3%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap545.14M
Revenue(TTM)1.42B
Net Income(TTM)95.81M
Analysts85
Price Target2.81 (34.77%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.54% |
Yearly Dividend0.12
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
DP19.05%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)0%
PT rev (3m)-9.84%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)0%
EPS NY rev (3m)-4.94%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)0.49%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-0.26%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 5.79 | ||
| Fwd PE | 7.93 | ||
| P/S | 0.38 | ||
| P/FCF | 6.48 | ||
| P/OCF | 5.28 | ||
| P/B | 1.95 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 3.82 |
EPS(TTM)0.36
EY17.27%
EPS(NY)0.26
Fwd EY12.61%
FCF(TTM)0.32
FCFY15.43%
OCF(TTM)0.39
OCFY18.92%
SpS5.43
BVpS1.07
TBVpS-0.44
PEG (NY)12.15
PEG (5Y)0.37
Graham Number2.94
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.78% | ||
| ROE | 34.27% | ||
| ROCE | 25.55% | ||
| ROIC | 19.38% | ||
| ROICexc | 20.09% | ||
| ROICexgc | 66.52% | ||
| OM | 10.52% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 6.75% | ||
| GM | 34.59% | ||
| FCFM | 5.92% |
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
ROICexc(3y)12.8%
ROICexc(5y)11.61%
ROICexgc(3y)52.6%
ROICexgc(5y)44.45%
ROCE(3y)14.93%
ROCE(5y)12.88%
ROICexgc growth 3Y21.82%
ROICexgc growth 5Y18.04%
ROICexc growth 3Y17.34%
ROICexc growth 5Y2.38%
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover1.3
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.69 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.46 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 0.91 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 29.53% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 1.34% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 51.7 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 48.24% | ||
| Profit Quality | 87.81% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.97 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.62 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.15 |
F-Score6
WACC6.08%
ROIC/WACC3.19
Cap/Depr(3y)19.72%
Cap/Depr(5y)13.93%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.34%
Cap/Sales(5y)0.97%
Profit Quality(3y)177.69%
Profit Quality(5y)503.09%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
EPS Next Y0.48%
EPS Next 2Y1.98%
EPS Next 3Y1.97%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%
Revenue Next Year1.98%
Revenue Next 2Y1.62%
Revenue Next 3Y1.42%
Revenue Next 5Y3.11%
EBIT growth 1Y-5.07%
EBIT growth 3Y21.04%
EBIT growth 5Y7.37%
EBIT Next Year68.82%
EBIT Next 3Y19.92%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-15.02%
FCF growth 3Y4.95%
FCF growth 5Y6.26%
OCF growth 1Y-8.3%
OCF growth 3Y8.91%
OCF growth 5Y7.93%
ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE / MN.MI FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 6 / 10 to MN.MI.
What is the valuation status of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 7 / 10 to ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI). This can be considered as Undervalued.
How profitable is ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?
ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) has a profitability rating of 8 / 10.
What is the earnings growth outlook for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is expected to grow by 0.48% in the next year.
How sustainable is the dividend of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?
The dividend rating of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is 7 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 19.05%.