ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - Euronext Milan - BIT:MN - IT0001469383 - Common Stock
2.14 EUR
+0.03 (+1.42%)
MN gets a fundamental rating of 6 out of 10. The analysis compared the fundamentals against 69 industry peers in the Media industry. MN has an excellent profitability rating, but there are some minor concerns on its financial health. MN is valued quite cheap, but it does not seem to be growing. MN also has an excellent dividend rating.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year MN was profitable.
MN had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
In the past 5 years MN has always been profitable.
In the past 5 years MN always reported a positive cash flow from operatings.
1.2 Ratios
MN has a Return On Assets of 8.78%. This is amongst the best in the industry. MN outperforms 95.59% of its industry peers.
With an excellent Return On Equity value of 34.27%, MN belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming 92.65% of the companies in the same industry.
MN has a better Return On Invested Capital (19.38%) than 97.06% of its industry peers.
The Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years for MN is above the industry average of 8.16%.
The 3 year average ROIC (11.34%) for MN is below the current ROIC(19.38%), indicating increased profibility in the last year.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.78% | ||
| ROE | 34.27% | ||
| ROIC | 19.38% |
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
1.3 Margins
With a decent Profit Margin value of 6.75%, MN is doing good in the industry, outperforming 75.00% of the companies in the same industry.
MN's Profit Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
MN has a better Operating Margin (10.52%) than 67.65% of its industry peers.
MN's Operating Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
Looking at the Gross Margin, with a value of 34.59%, MN is doing worse than 66.18% of the companies in the same industry.
MN's Gross Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 10.52% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 6.75% | ||
| GM | 34.59% |
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
MN has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), which means it is creating value.
Compared to 1 year ago, MN has about the same amount of shares outstanding.
Compared to 5 years ago, MN has more shares outstanding
Compared to 1 year ago, MN has a worse debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
MN has an Altman-Z score of 2.15. This is not the best score and indicates that MN is in the grey zone with still only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
MN has a better Altman-Z score (2.15) than 73.53% of its industry peers.
MN has a debt to FCF ratio of 3.46. This is a good value and a sign of high solvency as MN would need 3.46 years to pay back of all of its debts.
MN has a Debt to FCF ratio of 3.46. This is in the better half of the industry: MN outperforms 72.06% of its industry peers.
MN has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.69. This is a neutral value indicating MN is somewhat dependend on debt financing.
Looking at the Debt to Equity ratio, with a value of 0.69, MN is in line with its industry, outperforming 57.35% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.69 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.46 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.15 |
ROIC/WACC3.2
WACC6.05%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 0.97 indicates that MN may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
The Current ratio of MN (0.97) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
MN has a Quick Ratio of 0.97. This is a bad value and indicates that MN is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
MN has a Quick ratio of 0.62. This is in the lower half of the industry: MN underperforms 73.53% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.97 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.62 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
MN shows a slight negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has decreased by -8.79%.
The Earnings Per Share has been growing by 15.47% on average over the past years. This is quite good.
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 0.49% in the past year.
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 1.10% on average over the past years.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%
3.2 Future
MN is expected to show a small growth in Earnings Per Share. In the coming years, the EPS will grow by 1.31% yearly.
Based on estimates for the next years, MN will show a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 0.71% on average per year.
EPS Next Y0.81%
EPS Next 2Y1.11%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year0.67%
Revenue Next 2Y1.17%
Revenue Next 3Y1.25%
Revenue Next 5Y0.71%
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
The Revenue growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
A Price/Earnings ratio of 5.94 indicates a rather cheap valuation of MN.
MN's Price/Earnings ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. MN is cheaper than 89.71% of the companies in the same industry.
The average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio is at 27.19. MN is valued rather cheaply when compared to this.
A Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 8.28 indicates a reasonable valuation of MN.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, MN is valued cheaply inside the industry as 80.88% of the companies are valued more expensively.
When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of MN to the average of the S&P500 Index (23.88), we can say MN is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 5.94 | ||
| Fwd PE | 8.28 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, MN is valued cheaper than 83.82% of the companies in the same industry.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio of MN indicates a somewhat cheap valuation: MN is cheaper than 73.53% of the companies listed in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 6.65 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 3.84 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The high PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates an expensive valuation of the company.
The excellent profitability rating of MN may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)7.3
PEG (5Y)0.38
EPS Next 2Y1.11%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 6.64%, MN is a good candidate for dividend investing.
MN's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the industry average which is at 3.30. MN pays more dividend than 91.18% of the companies in the same industry.
Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 1.90, MN pays a better dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.64% |
5.2 History
The dividend of MN decreases each year by -6.82%.
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
19.05% of the earnings are spent on dividend by MN. This is a low number and sustainable payout ratio.
DP19.05%
EPS Next 2Y1.11%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
BIT:MN (1/9/2026, 7:00:00 PM)
2.14
+0.03 (+1.42%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorCommunication Services
GICS IndustryGroupMedia & Entertainment
GICS IndustryMedia
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners25.91%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners53.3%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap559.52M
Revenue(TTM)1.42B
Net Income(TTM)95.81M
Analysts85
Price Target2.78 (29.91%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.64% |
Yearly Dividend0.12
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
DP19.05%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)0%
PT rev (3m)-0.91%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)0%
EPS NY rev (3m)0.34%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)-0.52%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-0.8%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 5.94 | ||
| Fwd PE | 8.28 | ||
| P/S | 0.39 | ||
| P/FCF | 6.65 | ||
| P/OCF | 5.42 | ||
| P/B | 2 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 3.84 |
EPS(TTM)0.36
EY16.82%
EPS(NY)0.26
Fwd EY12.08%
FCF(TTM)0.32
FCFY15.03%
OCF(TTM)0.39
OCFY18.44%
SpS5.43
BVpS1.07
TBVpS-0.44
PEG (NY)7.3
PEG (5Y)0.38
Graham Number2.94
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.78% | ||
| ROE | 34.27% | ||
| ROCE | 25.55% | ||
| ROIC | 19.38% | ||
| ROICexc | 20.09% | ||
| ROICexgc | 66.52% | ||
| OM | 10.52% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 6.75% | ||
| GM | 34.59% | ||
| FCFM | 5.92% |
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
ROICexc(3y)12.8%
ROICexc(5y)11.61%
ROICexgc(3y)52.6%
ROICexgc(5y)44.45%
ROCE(3y)14.93%
ROCE(5y)12.88%
ROICexgc growth 3Y21.82%
ROICexgc growth 5Y18.04%
ROICexc growth 3Y17.34%
ROICexc growth 5Y2.38%
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover1.3
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.69 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.46 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 0.91 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 29.53% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 1.34% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 51.7 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 48.24% | ||
| Profit Quality | 87.81% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.97 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.62 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.15 |
F-Score6
WACC6.05%
ROIC/WACC3.2
Cap/Depr(3y)19.72%
Cap/Depr(5y)13.93%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.34%
Cap/Sales(5y)0.97%
Profit Quality(3y)177.69%
Profit Quality(5y)503.09%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
EPS Next Y0.81%
EPS Next 2Y1.11%
EPS Next 3Y1.31%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%
Revenue Next Year0.67%
Revenue Next 2Y1.17%
Revenue Next 3Y1.25%
Revenue Next 5Y0.71%
EBIT growth 1Y-5.07%
EBIT growth 3Y21.04%
EBIT growth 5Y7.37%
EBIT Next Year67.25%
EBIT Next 3Y19.67%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-15.02%
FCF growth 3Y4.95%
FCF growth 5Y6.26%
OCF growth 1Y-8.3%
OCF growth 3Y8.91%
OCF growth 5Y7.93%
ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE / MN.MI FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 6 / 10 to MN.MI.
What is the valuation status for MN stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 7 / 10 to ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI). This can be considered as Undervalued.
What is the profitability of MN stock?
ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) has a profitability rating of 8 / 10.
What are the PE and PB ratios of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?
The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is 5.94 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 2.
Can you provide the expected EPS growth for MN stock?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is expected to grow by 0.81% in the next year.