Logo image of MN.MI

ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) Stock Fundamental Analysis

Europe - BIT:MN - IT0001469383 - Common Stock

2.135 EUR
+0 (+0.23%)
Last: 9/26/2025, 7:00:00 PM
Fundamental Rating

6

We assign a fundamental rating of 6 out of 10 to MN. MN was compared to 64 industry peers in the Media industry. MN has an excellent profitability rating, but there are some minor concerns on its financial health. MN scores decently on growth, while it is valued quite cheap. This could make an interesting combination. Finally MN also has an excellent dividend rating.


Dividend Valuation Growth Profitability Health

8

1. Profitability

1.1 Basic Checks

In the past year MN was profitable.
MN had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
In the past 5 years MN has always been profitable.
Each year in the past 5 years MN had a positive operating cash flow.
MN.MI Yearly Net Income VS EBIT VS OCF VS FCFMN.MI Yearly Net Income VS EBIT VS OCF VS FCFYearly Net Income VS EBIT VS OCF VS FCF 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 100M -100M

1.2 Ratios

MN has a better Return On Assets (8.78%) than 93.75% of its industry peers.
The Return On Equity of MN (34.27%) is better than 92.19% of its industry peers.
MN has a better Return On Invested Capital (19.38%) than 96.88% of its industry peers.
MN had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 11.34%. This is above the industry average of 8.10%.
The 3 year average ROIC (11.34%) for MN is below the current ROIC(19.38%), indicating increased profibility in the last year.
Industry RankSector Rank
ROA 8.78%
ROE 34.27%
ROIC 19.38%
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
MN.MI Yearly ROA, ROE, ROICMN.MI Yearly ROA, ROE, ROICYearly ROA, ROE, ROIC 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 -50 -100

1.3 Margins

The Profit Margin of MN (6.75%) is better than 73.44% of its industry peers.
MN's Profit Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
With a decent Operating Margin value of 10.52%, MN is doing good in the industry, outperforming 70.31% of the companies in the same industry.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of MN has grown nicely.
Looking at the Gross Margin, with a value of 34.59%, MN is doing worse than 67.19% of the companies in the same industry.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of MN has grown nicely.
Industry RankSector Rank
OM 10.52%
PM (TTM) 6.75%
GM 34.59%
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
MN.MI Yearly Profit, Operating, Gross MarginsMN.MI Yearly Profit, Operating, Gross MarginsYearly Profit, Operating, Gross Margins 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 10 -10 20 30

4

2. Health

2.1 Basic Checks

With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), MN is creating value.
Compared to 1 year ago, MN has about the same amount of shares outstanding.
The number of shares outstanding for MN has been increased compared to 5 years ago.
MN has a worse debt/assets ratio than last year.
MN.MI Yearly Shares OutstandingMN.MI Yearly Shares OutstandingYearly Shares Outstanding 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 50M 100M 150M 200M 250M
MN.MI Yearly Total Debt VS Total AssetsMN.MI Yearly Total Debt VS Total AssetsYearly Total Debt VS Total Assets 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 500M 1B

2.2 Solvency

An Altman-Z score of 2.16 indicates that MN is not a great score, but indicates only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
MN has a better Altman-Z score (2.16) than 71.88% of its industry peers.
The Debt to FCF ratio of MN is 3.46, which is a good value as it means it would take MN, 3.46 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
The Debt to FCF ratio of MN (3.46) is better than 70.31% of its industry peers.
MN has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.69. This is a neutral value indicating MN is somewhat dependend on debt financing.
MN has a Debt to Equity ratio (0.69) which is in line with its industry peers.
Industry RankSector Rank
Debt/Equity 0.69
Debt/FCF 3.46
Altman-Z 2.16
ROIC/WACC3.18
WACC6.1%
MN.MI Yearly LT Debt VS Equity VS FCFMN.MI Yearly LT Debt VS Equity VS FCFYearly LT Debt VS Equity VS FCF 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 100M 200M 300M

2.3 Liquidity

A Current Ratio of 0.97 indicates that MN may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
MN has a Current ratio of 0.97. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: MN outperforms 51.56% of its industry peers.
MN has a Quick Ratio of 0.97. This is a bad value and indicates that MN is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
MN has a Quick ratio of 0.62. This is in the lower half of the industry: MN underperforms 76.56% of its industry peers.
Industry RankSector Rank
Current Ratio 0.97
Quick Ratio 0.62
MN.MI Yearly Current Assets VS Current LiabilitesMN.MI Yearly Current Assets VS Current LiabilitesYearly Current Assets VS Current Liabilites 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 200M 400M 600M

4

3. Growth

3.1 Past

The earnings per share for MN have decreased by -8.79% in the last year.
The Earnings Per Share has been growing by 15.47% on average over the past years. This is quite good.
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 0.49% in the past year.
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 1.10% on average over the past years.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%

3.2 Future

The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 1.97% on average over the next years.
The Revenue is expected to grow by 3.11% on average over the next years.
EPS Next Y0.48%
EPS Next 2Y1.98%
EPS Next 3Y1.97%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year1.48%
Revenue Next 2Y1.52%
Revenue Next 3Y1.48%
Revenue Next 5Y3.11%

3.3 Evolution

The EPS growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
MN.MI Yearly Revenue VS EstimatesMN.MI Yearly Revenue VS EstimatesYearly Revenue VS Estimates 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 200M 400M 600M 800M 1B
MN.MI Yearly EPS VS EstimatesMN.MI Yearly EPS VS EstimatesYearly EPS VS Estimates 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25

7

4. Valuation

4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio

MN is valuated cheaply with a Price/Earnings ratio of 5.93.
92.19% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than MN, based on the Price/Earnings ratio.
Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio of 27.32, MN is valued rather cheaply.
A Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 8.12 indicates a reasonable valuation of MN.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, MN is valued a bit cheaper than 71.88% of the companies in the same industry.
MN's Price/Forward Earnings ratio indicates a rather cheap valuation when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 22.89.
Industry RankSector Rank
PE 5.93
Fwd PE 8.12
MN.MI Price Earnings VS Forward Price EarningsMN.MI Price Earnings VS Forward Price Earnings ChartPrice Earnings - Forward Price Earnings PE FPE 5 10 15 20 25

4.2 Price Multiples

Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, MN is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 79.69% of the companies are valued more expensively.
Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, MN is valued a bit cheaper than 76.56% of the companies in the same industry.
Industry RankSector Rank
P/FCF 6.64
EV/EBITDA 3.87
MN.MI Per share dataMN.MI EPS, Sales, OCF, FCF, BookValue per sharePer Share Data Per Share 0 1 2 3 4 5

4.3 Compensation for Growth

The high PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates an expensive valuation of the company.
The excellent profitability rating of MN may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)12.44
PEG (5Y)0.38
EPS Next 2Y1.98%
EPS Next 3Y1.97%

7

5. Dividend

5.1 Amount

MN has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 6.59%, which is a nice return.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 6.21, MN pays a better dividend. On top of this MN pays more dividend than 89.06% of the companies listed in the same industry.
Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 2.42, MN pays a better dividend.
Industry RankSector Rank
Dividend Yield 6.59%

5.2 History

The dividend of MN decreases each year by -6.82%.
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0

5.3 Sustainability

MN pays out 19.05% of its income as dividend. This is a sustainable payout ratio.
DP19.05%
EPS Next 2Y1.98%
EPS Next 3Y1.97%
MN.MI Yearly Income VS Free CF VS DividendMN.MI Yearly Income VS Free CF VS DividendYearly Income VS Free CF VS Dividend 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 50M -50M 100M -100M -150M
MN.MI Dividend Payout.MN.MI Dividend Payout, showing the Payout Ratio.MN.MI Dividend Payout.PayoutRetained Earnings

ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE

BIT:MN (9/26/2025, 7:00:00 PM)

2.135

+0 (+0.23%)

Chartmill FA Rating
GICS IndustryGroupMedia & Entertainment
GICS IndustryMedia
Earnings (Last)07-31 2025-07-31
Earnings (Next)11-13 2025-11-13
Inst Owners26.29%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners53.3%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap558.22M
Analysts85
Price Target2.81 (31.62%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
Industry RankSector Rank
Dividend Yield 6.59%
Yearly Dividend0.12
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
DP19.05%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)0%
PT rev (3m)-9.84%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)-0.34%
EPS NY rev (3m)-4.94%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)0%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-0.75%
Valuation
Industry RankSector Rank
PE 5.93
Fwd PE 8.12
P/S 0.39
P/FCF 6.64
P/OCF 5.41
P/B 2
P/tB N/A
EV/EBITDA 3.87
EPS(TTM)0.36
EY16.86%
EPS(NY)0.26
Fwd EY12.32%
FCF(TTM)0.32
FCFY15.07%
OCF(TTM)0.39
OCFY18.48%
SpS5.43
BVpS1.07
TBVpS-0.44
PEG (NY)12.44
PEG (5Y)0.38
Profitability
Industry RankSector Rank
ROA 8.78%
ROE 34.27%
ROCE 25.55%
ROIC 19.38%
ROICexc 20.09%
ROICexgc 66.52%
OM 10.52%
PM (TTM) 6.75%
GM 34.59%
FCFM 5.92%
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
ROICexc(3y)12.8%
ROICexc(5y)11.61%
ROICexgc(3y)52.6%
ROICexgc(5y)44.45%
ROCE(3y)14.93%
ROCE(5y)12.88%
ROICexcg growth 3Y21.82%
ROICexcg growth 5Y18.04%
ROICexc growth 3Y17.34%
ROICexc growth 5Y2.38%
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover1.3
Health
Industry RankSector Rank
Debt/Equity 0.69
Debt/FCF 3.46
Debt/EBITDA 0.91
Cap/Depr 29.53%
Cap/Sales 1.34%
Interest Coverage 51.7
Cash Conversion 48.24%
Profit Quality 87.81%
Current Ratio 0.97
Quick Ratio 0.62
Altman-Z 2.16
F-Score6
WACC6.1%
ROIC/WACC3.18
Cap/Depr(3y)19.72%
Cap/Depr(5y)13.93%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.34%
Cap/Sales(5y)0.97%
Profit Quality(3y)177.69%
Profit Quality(5y)503.09%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
EPS Next Y0.48%
EPS Next 2Y1.98%
EPS Next 3Y1.97%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%
Revenue Next Year1.48%
Revenue Next 2Y1.52%
Revenue Next 3Y1.48%
Revenue Next 5Y3.11%
EBIT growth 1Y-5.07%
EBIT growth 3Y21.04%
EBIT growth 5Y7.37%
EBIT Next Year68.82%
EBIT Next 3Y19.92%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-15.02%
FCF growth 3Y4.95%
FCF growth 5Y6.26%
OCF growth 1Y-8.3%
OCF growth 3Y8.91%
OCF growth 5Y7.93%