ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - BIT:MN - IT0001469383 - Common Stock
2.13 EUR
+0.02 (+0.95%)
MN gets a fundamental rating of 6 out of 10. The analysis compared the fundamentals against 62 industry peers in the Media industry. While MN belongs to the best of the industry regarding profitability, there are some minor concerns on its financial health. MN is valued quite cheap, while showing a decent growth score. This is a good combination! MN also has an excellent dividend rating.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
MN had positive earnings in the past year.
MN had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
Each year in the past 5 years MN has been profitable.
MN had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
Looking at the Return On Assets, with a value of 8.78%, MN belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 95.08% of the companies in the same industry.
Looking at the Return On Equity, with a value of 34.27%, MN belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 91.80% of the companies in the same industry.
MN's Return On Invested Capital of 19.38% is amongst the best of the industry. MN outperforms 96.72% of its industry peers.
The Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years for MN is above the industry average of 7.68%.
The last Return On Invested Capital (19.38%) for MN is above the 3 year average (11.34%), which is a sign of increasing profitability.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.78% | ||
| ROE | 34.27% | ||
| ROIC | 19.38% |
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
1.3 Margins
MN has a better Profit Margin (6.75%) than 77.05% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of MN has grown nicely.
With a decent Operating Margin value of 10.52%, MN is doing good in the industry, outperforming 70.49% of the companies in the same industry.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of MN has grown nicely.
With a Gross Margin value of 34.59%, MN is not doing good in the industry: 70.49% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of MN has grown nicely.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 10.52% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 6.75% | ||
| GM | 34.59% |
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), MN is creating value.
MN has about the same amout of shares outstanding than it did 1 year ago.
The number of shares outstanding for MN has been increased compared to 5 years ago.
MN has a worse debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
An Altman-Z score of 2.15 indicates that MN is not a great score, but indicates only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
With a decent Altman-Z score value of 2.15, MN is doing good in the industry, outperforming 73.77% of the companies in the same industry.
The Debt to FCF ratio of MN is 3.46, which is a good value as it means it would take MN, 3.46 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
MN has a better Debt to FCF ratio (3.46) than 68.85% of its industry peers.
MN has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.69. This is a neutral value indicating MN is somewhat dependend on debt financing.
Looking at the Debt to Equity ratio, with a value of 0.69, MN is in line with its industry, outperforming 57.38% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.69 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.46 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.15 |
ROIC/WACC3.17
WACC6.11%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 0.97 indicates that MN may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
Looking at the Current ratio, with a value of 0.97, MN is in line with its industry, outperforming 52.46% of the companies in the same industry.
A Quick Ratio of 0.62 indicates that MN may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
With a Quick ratio value of 0.62, MN is not doing good in the industry: 80.33% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.97 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.62 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
MN shows a slight negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has decreased by -8.79%.
Measured over the past years, MN shows a quite strong growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been growing by 15.47% on average per year.
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 0.49% in the past year.
Measured over the past years, MN shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 1.10% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%
3.2 Future
MN is expected to show a small growth in Earnings Per Share. In the coming years, the EPS will grow by 1.97% yearly.
Based on estimates for the next years, MN will show a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 3.11% on average per year.
EPS Next Y0.48%
EPS Next 2Y1.98%
EPS Next 3Y1.97%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year1.98%
Revenue Next 2Y1.62%
Revenue Next 3Y1.42%
Revenue Next 5Y3.11%
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
The Revenue growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
A Price/Earnings ratio of 5.92 indicates a rather cheap valuation of MN.
MN's Price/Earnings ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. MN is cheaper than 93.44% of the companies in the same industry.
MN is valuated cheaply when we compare the Price/Earnings ratio to 26.83, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
The Price/Forward Earnings ratio is 8.10, which indicates a very decent valuation of MN.
75.41% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than MN, based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio.
Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 22.88, MN is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 5.92 | ||
| Fwd PE | 8.1 |
4.2 Price Multiples
MN's Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. MN is cheaper than 80.33% of the companies in the same industry.
MN's Price/Free Cash Flow ratio is a bit cheaper when compared to the industry. MN is cheaper than 73.77% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 6.62 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 3.84 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The high PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates MN does not grow enough to justify the current Price/Earnings ratio.
The excellent profitability rating of MN may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)12.41
PEG (5Y)0.38
EPS Next 2Y1.98%
EPS Next 3Y1.97%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
MN has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 6.54%, which is a nice return.
MN's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the industry average which is at 6.39. MN pays more dividend than 91.80% of the companies in the same industry.
Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 2.30, MN pays a better dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.54% |
5.2 History
The dividend of MN decreases each year by -6.82%.
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
19.05% of the earnings are spent on dividend by MN. This is a low number and sustainable payout ratio.
DP19.05%
EPS Next 2Y1.98%
EPS Next 3Y1.97%
BIT:MN (10/28/2025, 7:00:00 PM)
2.13
+0.02 (+0.95%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorCommunication Services
GICS IndustryGroupMedia & Entertainment
GICS IndustryMedia
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners26.29%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners53.3%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap556.91M
Revenue(TTM)1.42B
Net Income(TTM)95.81M
Analysts85
Price Target2.81 (31.92%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.54% |
Yearly Dividend0.12
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
DP19.05%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)0%
PT rev (3m)-9.84%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)0%
EPS NY rev (3m)-4.94%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)0.49%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-0.26%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 5.92 | ||
| Fwd PE | 8.1 | ||
| P/S | 0.39 | ||
| P/FCF | 6.62 | ||
| P/OCF | 5.4 | ||
| P/B | 1.99 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 3.84 |
EPS(TTM)0.36
EY16.9%
EPS(NY)0.26
Fwd EY12.35%
FCF(TTM)0.32
FCFY15.11%
OCF(TTM)0.39
OCFY18.52%
SpS5.43
BVpS1.07
TBVpS-0.44
PEG (NY)12.41
PEG (5Y)0.38
Graham Number2.94
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.78% | ||
| ROE | 34.27% | ||
| ROCE | 25.55% | ||
| ROIC | 19.38% | ||
| ROICexc | 20.09% | ||
| ROICexgc | 66.52% | ||
| OM | 10.52% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 6.75% | ||
| GM | 34.59% | ||
| FCFM | 5.92% |
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
ROICexc(3y)12.8%
ROICexc(5y)11.61%
ROICexgc(3y)52.6%
ROICexgc(5y)44.45%
ROCE(3y)14.93%
ROCE(5y)12.88%
ROICexgc growth 3Y21.82%
ROICexgc growth 5Y18.04%
ROICexc growth 3Y17.34%
ROICexc growth 5Y2.38%
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover1.3
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.69 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.46 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 0.91 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 29.53% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 1.34% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 51.7 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 48.24% | ||
| Profit Quality | 87.81% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.97 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.62 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.15 |
F-Score6
WACC6.11%
ROIC/WACC3.17
Cap/Depr(3y)19.72%
Cap/Depr(5y)13.93%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.34%
Cap/Sales(5y)0.97%
Profit Quality(3y)177.69%
Profit Quality(5y)503.09%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
EPS Next Y0.48%
EPS Next 2Y1.98%
EPS Next 3Y1.97%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%
Revenue Next Year1.98%
Revenue Next 2Y1.62%
Revenue Next 3Y1.42%
Revenue Next 5Y3.11%
EBIT growth 1Y-5.07%
EBIT growth 3Y21.04%
EBIT growth 5Y7.37%
EBIT Next Year68.82%
EBIT Next 3Y19.92%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-15.02%
FCF growth 3Y4.95%
FCF growth 5Y6.26%
OCF growth 1Y-8.3%
OCF growth 3Y8.91%
OCF growth 5Y7.93%
ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE / MN.MI FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 6 / 10 to MN.MI.
What is the valuation status of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 7 / 10 to ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI). This can be considered as Undervalued.
How profitable is ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?
ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) has a profitability rating of 8 / 10.
What is the earnings growth outlook for ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is expected to grow by 0.48% in the next year.
How sustainable is the dividend of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) stock?
The dividend rating of ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) is 7 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 19.05%.