ARNOLDO MONDADORI EDITORE (MN.MI) Stock Fundamental Analysis
BIT:MN - IT0001469383 - Common Stock
2.09 EUR
-0.02 (-0.95%)
MN gets a fundamental rating of 6 out of 10. The analysis compared the fundamentals against 62 industry peers in the Media industry. MN has an excellent profitability rating, but there are some minor concerns on its financial health. MN may be a bit undervalued, certainly considering the very reasonable score on growth Finally MN also has an excellent dividend rating.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
MN had positive earnings in the past year.
MN had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
Each year in the past 5 years MN has been profitable.
MN had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
MN has a Return On Assets of 8.78%. This is amongst the best in the industry. MN outperforms 93.55% of its industry peers.
Looking at the Return On Equity, with a value of 34.27%, MN belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 93.55% of the companies in the same industry.
With an excellent Return On Invested Capital value of 19.38%, MN belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming 96.77% of the companies in the same industry.
MN had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 11.34%. This is above the industry average of 7.82%.
The 3 year average ROIC (11.34%) for MN is below the current ROIC(19.38%), indicating increased profibility in the last year.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.78% | ||
| ROE | 34.27% | ||
| ROIC | 19.38% |
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
1.3 Margins
With a decent Profit Margin value of 6.75%, MN is doing good in the industry, outperforming 75.81% of the companies in the same industry.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of MN has grown nicely.
The Operating Margin of MN (10.52%) is better than 74.19% of its industry peers.
MN's Operating Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
MN's Gross Margin of 34.59% is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. MN is outperformed by 67.74% of its industry peers.
MN's Gross Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 10.52% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 6.75% | ||
| GM | 34.59% |
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), MN is creating value.
MN has about the same amout of shares outstanding than it did 1 year ago.
The number of shares outstanding for MN has been increased compared to 5 years ago.
The debt/assets ratio for MN is higher compared to a year ago.
2.2 Solvency
MN has an Altman-Z score of 2.15. This is not the best score and indicates that MN is in the grey zone with still only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
MN has a better Altman-Z score (2.15) than 67.74% of its industry peers.
MN has a debt to FCF ratio of 3.46. This is a good value and a sign of high solvency as MN would need 3.46 years to pay back of all of its debts.
Looking at the Debt to FCF ratio, with a value of 3.46, MN is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 69.35% of the companies in the same industry.
MN has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.69. This is a neutral value indicating MN is somewhat dependend on debt financing.
MN has a Debt to Equity ratio (0.69) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.69 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.46 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.15 |
ROIC/WACC3.21
WACC6.04%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 0.97 indicates that MN may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
With a Current ratio value of 0.97, MN perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 53.23% of the companies in the same industry.
MN has a Quick Ratio of 0.97. This is a bad value and indicates that MN is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
With a Quick ratio value of 0.62, MN is not doing good in the industry: 77.42% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.97 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.62 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
MN shows a slight negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has decreased by -8.79%.
MN shows quite a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. Measured over the last years, the EPS has been growing by 15.47% yearly.
MN shows a small growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 0.49%.
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 1.10% on average over the past years.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%
3.2 Future
The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 1.64% on average over the next years.
Based on estimates for the next years, MN will show a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 3.11% on average per year.
EPS Next Y0.81%
EPS Next 2Y1.72%
EPS Next 3Y1.64%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year1.48%
Revenue Next 2Y1.52%
Revenue Next 3Y1.48%
Revenue Next 5Y3.11%
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
With a Price/Earnings ratio of 5.81, the valuation of MN can be described as very cheap.
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, MN is valued cheaper than 91.94% of the companies in the same industry.
MN is valuated cheaply when we compare the Price/Earnings ratio to 27.06, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
A Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 7.99 indicates a rather cheap valuation of MN.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, MN is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 79.03% of the companies are valued more expensively.
When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of MN to the average of the S&P500 Index (22.69), we can say MN is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 5.81 | ||
| Fwd PE | 7.99 |
4.2 Price Multiples
77.42% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than MN, based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio.
MN's Price/Free Cash Flow ratio is a bit cheaper when compared to the industry. MN is cheaper than 75.81% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 6.5 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 3.82 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The high PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates MN does not grow enough to justify the current Price/Earnings ratio.
MN has an outstanding profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)7.13
PEG (5Y)0.38
EPS Next 2Y1.72%
EPS Next 3Y1.64%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
MN has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 6.64%, which is a nice return.
MN's Dividend Yield is rather good when compared to the industry average which is at 5.92. MN pays more dividend than 87.10% of the companies in the same industry.
Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 2.41, MN pays a better dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.64% |
5.2 History
The dividend of MN decreases each year by -6.82%.
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
MN pays out 19.05% of its income as dividend. This is a sustainable payout ratio.
DP19.05%
EPS Next 2Y1.72%
EPS Next 3Y1.64%
BIT:MN (9/5/2025, 7:00:00 PM)
2.09
-0.02 (-0.95%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorCommunication Services
GICS IndustryGroupMedia & Entertainment
GICS IndustryMedia
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners26.56%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners53.3%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap546.45M
Analysts85
Price Target2.81 (34.45%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.64% |
Yearly Dividend0.12
Dividend Growth(5Y)-6.82%
DP19.05%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)-9.84%
PT rev (3m)-9.84%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)-4.62%
EPS NY rev (3m)-4.62%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)0%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-0.75%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 5.81 | ||
| Fwd PE | 7.99 | ||
| P/S | 0.38 | ||
| P/FCF | 6.5 | ||
| P/OCF | 5.3 | ||
| P/B | 1.95 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 3.82 |
EPS(TTM)0.36
EY17.22%
EPS(NY)0.26
Fwd EY12.52%
FCF(TTM)0.32
FCFY15.39%
OCF(TTM)0.39
OCFY18.88%
SpS5.43
BVpS1.07
TBVpS-0.44
PEG (NY)7.13
PEG (5Y)0.38
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 8.78% | ||
| ROE | 34.27% | ||
| ROCE | 25.55% | ||
| ROIC | 19.38% | ||
| ROICexc | 20.09% | ||
| ROICexgc | 66.52% | ||
| OM | 10.52% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 6.75% | ||
| GM | 34.59% | ||
| FCFM | 5.92% |
ROA(3y)5.5%
ROA(5y)4.27%
ROE(3y)20.26%
ROE(5y)16.7%
ROIC(3y)11.34%
ROIC(5y)9.78%
ROICexc(3y)12.8%
ROICexc(5y)11.61%
ROICexgc(3y)52.6%
ROICexgc(5y)44.45%
ROCE(3y)14.93%
ROCE(5y)12.88%
ROICexcg growth 3Y21.82%
ROICexcg growth 5Y18.04%
ROICexc growth 3Y17.34%
ROICexc growth 5Y2.38%
OM growth 3Y15.27%
OM growth 5Y6.2%
PM growth 3Y5.57%
PM growth 5Y15.11%
GM growth 3Y3.82%
GM growth 5Y3.22%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover1.3
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.69 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.46 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 0.91 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 29.53% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 1.34% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 51.7 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 48.24% | ||
| Profit Quality | 87.81% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.97 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.62 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.15 |
F-Score6
WACC6.04%
ROIC/WACC3.21
Cap/Depr(3y)19.72%
Cap/Depr(5y)13.93%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.34%
Cap/Sales(5y)0.97%
Profit Quality(3y)177.69%
Profit Quality(5y)503.09%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-8.79%
EPS 3Y10.66%
EPS 5Y15.47%
EPS Q2Q%-50.74%
EPS Next Y0.81%
EPS Next 2Y1.72%
EPS Next 3Y1.64%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)0.49%
Revenue growth 3Y5%
Revenue growth 5Y1.1%
Sales Q2Q%0.6%
Revenue Next Year1.48%
Revenue Next 2Y1.52%
Revenue Next 3Y1.48%
Revenue Next 5Y3.11%
EBIT growth 1Y-5.07%
EBIT growth 3Y21.04%
EBIT growth 5Y7.37%
EBIT Next Year66.16%
EBIT Next 3Y19.55%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-15.02%
FCF growth 3Y4.95%
FCF growth 5Y6.26%
OCF growth 1Y-8.3%
OCF growth 3Y8.91%
OCF growth 5Y7.93%