LANDSEA HOMES CORP (LSEA) Stock Fundamental Analysis
NASDAQ:LSEA - Nasdaq - US51509P1030 - Common Stock - Currency: USD
Taking everything into account, LSEA scores 3 out of 10 in our fundamental rating. LSEA was compared to 64 industry peers in the Household Durables industry. LSEA has a bad profitability rating. Also its financial health evaluation is rather negative. LSEA is valied quite expensively at the moment, while it does show a decent growth rate.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year LSEA was profitable.
LSEA had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
LSEA had positive earnings in 4 of the past 5 years.
LSEA had a positive operating cash flow in 4 of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
LSEA's Return On Assets of 0.58% is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. LSEA is outperformed by 60.94% of its industry peers.
LSEA's Return On Equity of 1.48% is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. LSEA is outperformed by 60.94% of its industry peers.
With a Return On Invested Capital value of 0.89%, LSEA is not doing good in the industry: 68.75% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
Measured over the past 3 years, the Average Return On Invested Capital for LSEA is significantly below the industry average of 10.33%.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 0.58% | ||
| ROE | 1.48% | ||
| ROIC | 0.89% |
ROA(3y)2.66%
ROA(5y)-4.25%
ROE(3y)6%
ROE(5y)-8.19%
ROIC(3y)3.35%
ROIC(5y)N/A
1.3 Margins
LSEA's Profit Margin of 0.62% is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. LSEA is outperformed by 60.94% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of LSEA has declined.
LSEA has a worse Operating Margin (1.11%) than 65.63% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of LSEA has declined.
LSEA has a worse Gross Margin (14.29%) than 93.75% of its industry peers.
LSEA's Gross Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 1.11% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 0.62% | ||
| GM | 14.29% |
OM growth 3Y-32.72%
OM growth 5YN/A
PM growth 3Y-39.59%
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-6.27%
GM growth 5YN/A
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
LSEA has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is below the Cost of Capital (WACC), which means it is destroying value.
The number of shares outstanding for LSEA has been reduced compared to 1 year ago.
LSEA has more shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
Compared to 1 year ago, LSEA has a worse debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
LSEA has an Altman-Z score of 2.14. This is not the best score and indicates that LSEA is in the grey zone with still only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
Looking at the Altman-Z score, with a value of 2.14, LSEA is doing worse than 62.50% of the companies in the same industry.
The Debt to FCF ratio of LSEA is 15.51, which is on the high side as it means it would take LSEA, 15.51 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
LSEA has a Debt to FCF ratio (15.51) which is in line with its industry peers.
LSEA has a Debt/Equity ratio of 1.10. This is a high value indicating a heavy dependency on external financing.
Looking at the Debt to Equity ratio, with a value of 1.10, LSEA is doing worse than 76.56% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.1 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 15.51 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.14 |
ROIC/WACC0.11
WACC8.45%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 4.80 indicates that LSEA has no problem at all paying its short term obligations.
LSEA has a better Current ratio (4.80) than 73.44% of its industry peers.
A Quick Ratio of 0.14 indicates that LSEA may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
LSEA has a worse Quick ratio (0.14) than 93.75% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.8 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.14 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
LSEA shows a strong negative growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year the EPS decreased by -61.76%.
LSEA shows a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. Measured over the last years, the EPS has been growing by 63.78% yearly.
The Revenue has grown by 24.16% in the past year. This is a very strong growth!
Measured over the past years, LSEA shows a quite strong growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 14.85% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-61.76%
EPS 3Y-30.16%
EPS 5Y63.78%
EPS Q2Q%-2100%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)24.16%
Revenue growth 3Y14.85%
Revenue growth 5YN/A
Sales Q2Q%5.7%
3.2 Future
Based on estimates for the next years, LSEA will show a quite strong growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will grow by 9.38% on average per year.
Based on estimates for the next years, LSEA will show a decrease in Revenue. The Revenue will decrease by -2.41% on average per year.
EPS Next Y-23.72%
EPS Next 2Y9.38%
EPS Next 3YN/A
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year-7.42%
Revenue Next 2Y-2.41%
Revenue Next 3YN/A
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
The Revenue growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
A Price/Earnings ratio of 43.46 indicates a quite expensive valuation of LSEA.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Earnings ratio of LSEA indicates a slightly more expensive valuation: LSEA is more expensive than 70.31% of the companies listed in the same industry.
LSEA's Price/Earnings ratio indicates a rather expensive valuation when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 26.34.
A Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 20.09 indicates a rather expensive valuation of LSEA.
LSEA's Price/Forward Earnings ratio is a bit more expensive when compared to the industry. LSEA is more expensive than 68.75% of the companies in the same industry.
The average S&P500 Price/Forward Earnings ratio is at 22.19. LSEA is around the same levels.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 43.46 | ||
| Fwd PE | 20.09 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, LSEA is valued a bit more expensive than 73.44% of the companies in the same industry.
82.81% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than LSEA, based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 8.77 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 43.11 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)0.68
EPS Next 2Y9.38%
EPS Next 3YN/A
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
LSEA does not give a dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
11.3
+0.01 (+0.09%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryGroupConsumer Durables & Apparel
GICS IndustryHousehold Durables
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners60.71%
Inst Owner Change-1.03%
Ins Owners14.2%
Ins Owner Change1.54%
Market Cap411.43M
Analysts48.89
Price Target11.37 (0.62%)
Short Float %7.39%
Short Ratio1.68
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
Yearly DividendN/A
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
DPN/A
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)0
Avg EPS beat(2)-100.66%
Min EPS beat(2)-122.18%
Max EPS beat(2)-79.14%
EPS beat(4)1
Avg EPS beat(4)18.92%
Min EPS beat(4)-122.18%
Max EPS beat(4)297.46%
EPS beat(8)4
Avg EPS beat(8)16.67%
EPS beat(12)6
Avg EPS beat(12)12.26%
EPS beat(16)9
Avg EPS beat(16)35.14%
Revenue beat(2)0
Avg Revenue beat(2)-5.4%
Min Revenue beat(2)-8.47%
Max Revenue beat(2)-2.33%
Revenue beat(4)1
Avg Revenue beat(4)2.55%
Min Revenue beat(4)-8.47%
Max Revenue beat(4)24.84%
Revenue beat(8)5
Avg Revenue beat(8)7.09%
Revenue beat(12)7
Avg Revenue beat(12)5.14%
Revenue beat(16)9
Avg Revenue beat(16)6.09%
PT rev (1m)4.53%
PT rev (3m)-12.55%
EPS NQ rev (1m)-313.33%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-217.77%
EPS NY rev (1m)0%
EPS NY rev (3m)-70.51%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)-5.53%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)-11.43%
Revenue NY rev (1m)-1.64%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-7.19%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 43.46 | ||
| Fwd PE | 20.09 | ||
| P/S | 0.26 | ||
| P/FCF | 8.77 | ||
| P/OCF | 7.8 | ||
| P/B | 0.62 | ||
| P/tB | 0.82 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 43.11 |
EPS(TTM)0.26
EY2.3%
EPS(NY)0.56
Fwd EY4.98%
FCF(TTM)1.29
FCFY11.4%
OCF(TTM)1.45
OCFY12.82%
SpS43.04
BVpS18.13
TBVpS13.86
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)0.68
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 0.58% | ||
| ROE | 1.48% | ||
| ROCE | 1.24% | ||
| ROIC | 0.89% | ||
| ROICexc | 0.91% | ||
| ROICexgc | 1.14% | ||
| OM | 1.11% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 0.62% | ||
| GM | 14.29% | ||
| FCFM | 2.99% |
ROA(3y)2.66%
ROA(5y)-4.25%
ROE(3y)6%
ROE(5y)-8.19%
ROIC(3y)3.35%
ROIC(5y)N/A
ROICexc(3y)3.7%
ROICexc(5y)N/A
ROICexgc(3y)4.26%
ROICexgc(5y)N/A
ROCE(3y)4.7%
ROCE(5y)N/A
ROICexcg growth 3Y-34.43%
ROICexcg growth 5YN/A
ROICexc growth 3Y-36.82%
ROICexc growth 5YN/A
OM growth 3Y-32.72%
OM growth 5YN/A
PM growth 3Y-39.59%
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-6.27%
GM growth 5YN/A
F-Score5
Asset Turnover0.93
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.1 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 15.51 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 28.46 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 71.3% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 0.37% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 250 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 206.38% | ||
| Profit Quality | 479.4% | ||
| Current Ratio | 4.8 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.14 | ||
| Altman-Z | 2.14 |
F-Score5
WACC8.45%
ROIC/WACC0.11
Cap/Depr(3y)108.2%
Cap/Depr(5y)N/A
Cap/Sales(3y)0.46%
Cap/Sales(5y)N/A
Profit Quality(3y)73.27%
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-61.76%
EPS 3Y-30.16%
EPS 5Y63.78%
EPS Q2Q%-2100%
EPS Next Y-23.72%
EPS Next 2Y9.38%
EPS Next 3YN/A
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)24.16%
Revenue growth 3Y14.85%
Revenue growth 5YN/A
Sales Q2Q%5.7%
Revenue Next Year-7.42%
Revenue Next 2Y-2.41%
Revenue Next 3YN/A
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y-49.43%
EBIT growth 3Y-22.72%
EBIT growth 5YN/A
EBIT Next Year49.97%
EBIT Next 3YN/A
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-2.48%
FCF growth 3Y-7.73%
FCF growth 5YN/A
OCF growth 1Y-1.6%
OCF growth 3Y-3.94%
OCF growth 5YN/A