LNA SANTE (LNA.PA) Stock Fundamental Analysis
EPA:LNA - Euronext Paris - Matif - FR0004170017 - Common Stock - Currency: EUR
LNA gets a fundamental rating of 5 out of 10. The analysis compared the fundamentals against 25 industry peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. LNA has a medium profitability rating, but doesn't score so well on its financial health evaluation. LNA is valued quite cheap, while showing a decent growth score. This is a good combination!
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
LNA had positive earnings in the past year.
LNA had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
LNA had positive earnings in each of the past 5 years.
Each year in the past 5 years LNA had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
With a Return On Assets value of 1.55%, LNA is not doing good in the industry: 68.00% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
LNA has a Return On Equity of 7.76%. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: LNA outperforms 52.00% of its industry peers.
Looking at the Return On Invested Capital, with a value of 3.58%, LNA is in line with its industry, outperforming 48.00% of the companies in the same industry.
Measured over the past 3 years, the Average Return On Invested Capital for LNA is below the industry average of 6.33%.
The 3 year average ROIC (3.40%) for LNA is below the current ROIC(3.58%), indicating increased profibility in the last year.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.55% | ||
| ROE | 7.76% | ||
| ROIC | 3.58% |
ROA(3y)1.6%
ROA(5y)1.4%
ROE(3y)9.21%
ROE(5y)8.55%
ROIC(3y)3.4%
ROIC(5y)3.27%
1.3 Margins
Looking at the Profit Margin, with a value of 3.13%, LNA is in line with its industry, outperforming 48.00% of the companies in the same industry.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of LNA has declined.
The Operating Margin of LNA (8.80%) is better than 76.00% of its industry peers.
LNA's Operating Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
LNA has a Gross Margin of 89.87%. This is amongst the best in the industry. LNA outperforms 92.00% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of LNA has grown nicely.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 8.8% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 3.13% | ||
| GM | 89.87% |
OM growth 3Y2.66%
OM growth 5Y1.65%
PM growth 3Y32.72%
PM growth 5Y-4.46%
GM growth 3Y1.36%
GM growth 5Y2.99%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is below the Cost of Capital (WACC), so LNA is destroying value.
LNA has less shares outstanding than it did 1 year ago.
LNA has more shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
LNA has a better debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
LNA has an Altman-Z score of 0.90. This is a bad value and indicates that LNA is not financially healthy and even has some risk of bankruptcy.
Looking at the Altman-Z score, with a value of 0.90, LNA is doing worse than 68.00% of the companies in the same industry.
LNA has a debt to FCF ratio of 7.08. This is a slightly negative value and a sign of low solvency as LNA would need 7.08 years to pay back of all of its debts.
LNA has a better Debt to FCF ratio (7.08) than 64.00% of its industry peers.
LNA has a Debt/Equity ratio of 2.21. This is a high value indicating a heavy dependency on external financing.
Looking at the Debt to Equity ratio, with a value of 2.21, LNA is doing worse than 72.00% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 2.21 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 7.08 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.9 |
ROIC/WACC0.98
WACC3.64%
2.3 Liquidity
LNA has a Current Ratio of 0.91. This is a bad value and indicates that LNA is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
LNA's Current ratio of 0.91 is in line compared to the rest of the industry. LNA outperforms 52.00% of its industry peers.
LNA has a Quick Ratio of 0.91. This is a bad value and indicates that LNA is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
With a Quick ratio value of 0.51, LNA is not doing good in the industry: 84.00% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.91 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.51 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The earnings per share for LNA have decreased by -0.20% in the last year.
Measured over the past 5 years, LNA shows a small growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been growing by 0.57% on average per year.
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 4.10% in the past year.
LNA shows a small growth in Revenue. Measured over the last years, the Revenue has been growing by 6.44% yearly.
EPS 1Y (TTM)-0.2%
EPS 3Y41.12%
EPS 5Y0.57%
EPS Q2Q%3.87%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)4.1%
Revenue growth 3Y8.65%
Revenue growth 5Y6.44%
Sales Q2Q%7.13%
3.2 Future
Based on estimates for the next years, LNA will show a quite strong growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will grow by 13.84% on average per year.
Based on estimates for the next years, LNA will show a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 6.20% on average per year.
EPS Next Y0%
EPS Next 2Y10.22%
EPS Next 3Y13.84%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year7.2%
Revenue Next 2Y9.76%
Revenue Next 3Y9.08%
Revenue Next 5Y6.2%
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is stable.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
LNA is valuated reasonably with a Price/Earnings ratio of 10.30.
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, LNA is valued cheaply inside the industry as 84.00% of the companies are valued more expensively.
LNA is valuated cheaply when we compare the Price/Earnings ratio to 26.35, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 8.79, the valuation of LNA can be described as reasonable.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of LNA indicates a rather cheap valuation: LNA is cheaper than 84.00% of the companies listed in the same industry.
LNA is valuated cheaply when we compare the Price/Forward Earnings ratio to 22.20, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 10.3 | ||
| Fwd PE | 8.79 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio of LNA indicates a rather cheap valuation: LNA is cheaper than 88.00% of the companies listed in the same industry.
LNA's Price/Free Cash Flow ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. LNA is cheaper than 92.00% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 2.39 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 5.75 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
LNA has a very decent profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
LNA's earnings are expected to grow with 13.84% in the coming years. This may justify a more expensive valuation.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)17.95
EPS Next 2Y10.22%
EPS Next 3Y13.84%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
LNA has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 2.72%.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 2.77, LNA pays a bit more dividend than its industry peers.
Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 2.40, LNA has a dividend comparable with the average S&P500 company.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.72% |
5.2 History
On average, the dividend of LNA grows each year by 9.08%, which is quite nice.
Dividend Growth(5Y)9.08%
Div Incr Years3
Div Non Decr Years3
5.3 Sustainability
21.45% of the earnings are spent on dividend by LNA. This is a low number and sustainable payout ratio.
The dividend of LNA is growing, but earnings are growing more, so the dividend growth is sustainable.
DP21.45%
EPS Next 2Y10.22%
EPS Next 3Y13.84%
EPA:LNA (5/28/2025, 5:17:24 PM)
24.1
-0.1 (-0.41%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorHealth Care
GICS IndustryGroupHealth Care Equipment & Services
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & Services
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners9.32%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners1%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap258.11M
Analysts85
Price Target32.9 (36.51%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.72% |
Yearly Dividend0.5
Dividend Growth(5Y)9.08%
DP21.45%
Div Incr Years3
Div Non Decr Years3
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)0%
PT rev (3m)3.2%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)0%
EPS NY rev (3m)-4.18%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)-0.52%
Revenue NY rev (3m)0%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 10.3 | ||
| Fwd PE | 8.79 | ||
| P/S | 0.34 | ||
| P/FCF | 2.39 | ||
| P/OCF | 2.14 | ||
| P/B | 0.84 | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 5.75 |
EPS(TTM)2.34
EY9.71%
EPS(NY)2.74
Fwd EY11.38%
FCF(TTM)10.1
FCFY41.92%
OCF(TTM)11.25
OCFY46.67%
SpS71.15
BVpS28.67
TBVpS-25.44
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)17.95
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.55% | ||
| ROE | 7.76% | ||
| ROCE | 5.91% | ||
| ROIC | 3.58% | ||
| ROICexc | 3.81% | ||
| ROICexgc | 7.82% | ||
| OM | 8.8% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 3.13% | ||
| GM | 89.87% | ||
| FCFM | 14.2% |
ROA(3y)1.6%
ROA(5y)1.4%
ROE(3y)9.21%
ROE(5y)8.55%
ROIC(3y)3.4%
ROIC(5y)3.27%
ROICexc(3y)3.75%
ROICexc(5y)3.67%
ROICexgc(3y)8.09%
ROICexgc(5y)7.62%
ROCE(3y)5.85%
ROCE(5y)5.72%
ROICexcg growth 3Y1.58%
ROICexcg growth 5Y-22.98%
ROICexc growth 3Y5.91%
ROICexc growth 5Y-10.8%
OM growth 3Y2.66%
OM growth 5Y1.65%
PM growth 3Y32.72%
PM growth 5Y-4.46%
GM growth 3Y1.36%
GM growth 5Y2.99%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover0.49
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 2.21 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 7.08 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 4.38 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 13.92% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 1.61% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 2.37 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 77.69% | ||
| Profit Quality | 453.89% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.91 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.51 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.9 |
F-Score6
WACC3.64%
ROIC/WACC0.98
Cap/Depr(3y)15.81%
Cap/Depr(5y)15.75%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.85%
Cap/Sales(5y)1.84%
Profit Quality(3y)330.5%
Profit Quality(5y)645.43%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)-0.2%
EPS 3Y41.12%
EPS 5Y0.57%
EPS Q2Q%3.87%
EPS Next Y0%
EPS Next 2Y10.22%
EPS Next 3Y13.84%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)4.1%
Revenue growth 3Y8.65%
Revenue growth 5Y6.44%
Sales Q2Q%7.13%
Revenue Next Year7.2%
Revenue Next 2Y9.76%
Revenue Next 3Y9.08%
Revenue Next 5Y6.2%
EBIT growth 1Y2.84%
EBIT growth 3Y11.54%
EBIT growth 5Y8.2%
EBIT Next Year136.25%
EBIT Next 3Y40.05%
EBIT Next 5Y26.01%
FCF growth 1Y-4.21%
FCF growth 3Y-13.92%
FCF growth 5Y17.09%
OCF growth 1Y-3.27%
OCF growth 3Y-12.69%
OCF growth 5Y15.22%