LEG IMMOBILIEN SE (LEG.DE) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - Frankfurt Stock Exchange - FRA:LEG - DE000LEG1110 - Common Stock
63.85 EUR
0 (0%)
Overall LEG gets a fundamental rating of 5 out of 10. We evaluated LEG against 75 industry peers in the Real Estate Management & Development industry. While LEG is still in line with the averages on profitability rating, there are concerns on its financial health. LEG may be a bit undervalued, certainly considering the very reasonable score on growth
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
LEG had positive earnings in the past year.
In the past year LEG had a positive cash flow from operations.
LEG had positive earnings in 4 of the past 5 years.
Each year in the past 5 years LEG had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
The Return On Assets of LEG (5.79%) is better than 92.00% of its industry peers.
LEG's Return On Equity of 14.15% is amongst the best of the industry. LEG outperforms 96.00% of its industry peers.
LEG's Return On Invested Capital of 1.99% is in line compared to the rest of the industry. LEG outperforms 54.67% of its industry peers.
The Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years for LEG is below the industry average of 3.89%.
The last Return On Invested Capital (1.99%) for LEG is above the 3 year average (1.76%), which is a sign of increasing profitability.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 5.79% | ||
| ROE | 14.15% | ||
| ROIC | 1.99% |
ROA(3y)-2.23%
ROA(5y)2.11%
ROE(3y)-5.85%
ROE(5y)4.04%
ROIC(3y)1.76%
ROIC(5y)1.7%
1.3 Margins
With an excellent Profit Margin value of 86.80%, LEG belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming 93.33% of the companies in the same industry.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of LEG has declined.
The Operating Margin of LEG (45.94%) is better than 73.33% of its industry peers.
LEG's Operating Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
LEG has a Gross Margin (49.46%) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
LEG's Gross Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 45.94% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 86.8% | ||
| GM | 49.46% |
OM growth 3Y-4.69%
OM growth 5Y-2.56%
PM growth 3Y-69.54%
PM growth 5Y-45.04%
GM growth 3Y-4.06%
GM growth 5Y-2.36%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) below the Cost of Capital (WACC), LEG is destroying value.
Compared to 1 year ago, LEG has more shares outstanding
The number of shares outstanding for LEG has been increased compared to 5 years ago.
Compared to 1 year ago, LEG has a worse debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
LEG has an Altman-Z score of 0.76. This is a bad value and indicates that LEG is not financially healthy and even has some risk of bankruptcy.
Looking at the Altman-Z score, with a value of 0.76, LEG is doing worse than 60.00% of the companies in the same industry.
The Debt to FCF ratio of LEG is 22.45, which is on the high side as it means it would take LEG, 22.45 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
Looking at the Debt to FCF ratio, with a value of 22.45, LEG is in line with its industry, outperforming 56.00% of the companies in the same industry.
LEG has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.90. This is a neutral value indicating LEG is somewhat dependend on debt financing.
LEG has a Debt to Equity ratio of 0.90. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: LEG outperforms 52.00% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.9 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 22.45 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.76 |
ROIC/WACC0.65
WACC3.07%
2.3 Liquidity
LEG has a Current Ratio of 0.27. This is a bad value and indicates that LEG is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
LEG has a worse Current ratio (0.27) than 81.33% of its industry peers.
A Quick Ratio of 0.27 indicates that LEG may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
LEG's Quick ratio of 0.27 is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. LEG is outperformed by 73.33% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.27 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.27 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
LEG shows a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has been growing by 166.60%, which is quite impressive.
Measured over the past years, LEG shows a decrease in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been decreasing by -3.40% on average per year.
LEG shows a small growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 7.88%.
The Revenue has been growing by 10.00% on average over the past years. This is quite good.
EPS 1Y (TTM)166.6%
EPS 3Y23.02%
EPS 5Y-3.4%
EPS Q2Q%709.52%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)7.88%
Revenue growth 3Y10.71%
Revenue growth 5Y10%
Sales Q2Q%59.19%
3.2 Future
Based on estimates for the next years, LEG will show a small growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will grow by 6.84% on average per year.
Based on estimates for the next years, LEG will show a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 6.79% on average per year.
EPS Next Y17.57%
EPS Next 2Y8.79%
EPS Next 3Y6.84%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year33.66%
Revenue Next 2Y16.73%
Revenue Next 3Y6.79%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is decreasing.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
LEG is valuated cheaply with a Price/Earnings ratio of 5.00.
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, LEG is valued cheaper than 96.00% of the companies in the same industry.
Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio of 26.92, LEG is valued rather cheaply.
With a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 10.28, the valuation of LEG can be described as very reasonable.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, LEG is valued cheaply inside the industry as 82.67% of the companies are valued more expensively.
When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of LEG to the average of the S&P500 Index (23.57), we can say LEG is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 5 | ||
| Fwd PE | 10.28 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio, LEG is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 61.33% of the companies are valued more expensively.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio of LEG indicates a somewhat cheap valuation: LEG is cheaper than 69.33% of the companies listed in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 10.95 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 21.92 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
LEG has a very decent profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)0.28
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y8.79%
EPS Next 3Y6.84%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
LEG has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 4.34%, which is a nice return.
LEG's Dividend Yield is a higher than the industry average which is at 4.22.
Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 1.94, LEG pays a better dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.34% |
5.2 History
The dividend of LEG decreases each year by -9.38%.
Dividend Growth(5Y)-9.38%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years1
5.3 Sustainability
LEG pays out 10.52% of its income as dividend. This is a sustainable payout ratio.
DP10.52%
EPS Next 2Y8.79%
EPS Next 3Y6.84%
FRA:LEG (1/8/2026, 12:38:04 PM)
63.85
0 (0%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorReal Estate
GICS IndustryGroupEquity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
GICS IndustryReal Estate Management & Development
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners66.1%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins OwnersN/A
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap4.83B
Revenue(TTM)1.37B
Net Income(TTM)1.19B
Analysts76.36
Price Target90.75 (42.13%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.34% |
Yearly Dividend2.06
Dividend Growth(5Y)-9.38%
DP10.52%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years1
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)1
Avg EPS beat(2)219.98%
Min EPS beat(2)-20.96%
Max EPS beat(2)460.93%
EPS beat(4)2
Avg EPS beat(4)114.48%
Min EPS beat(4)-21.46%
Max EPS beat(4)460.93%
EPS beat(8)3
Avg EPS beat(8)52.17%
EPS beat(12)3
Avg EPS beat(12)18.23%
EPS beat(16)4
Avg EPS beat(16)-8.34%
Revenue beat(2)2
Avg Revenue beat(2)20.5%
Min Revenue beat(2)20.15%
Max Revenue beat(2)20.85%
Revenue beat(4)3
Avg Revenue beat(4)23.59%
Min Revenue beat(4)-6.68%
Max Revenue beat(4)60.06%
Revenue beat(8)5
Avg Revenue beat(8)20.27%
Revenue beat(12)7
Avg Revenue beat(12)15.62%
Revenue beat(16)11
Avg Revenue beat(16)21.85%
PT rev (1m)1.14%
PT rev (3m)0.87%
EPS NQ rev (1m)-2.67%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-4.2%
EPS NY rev (1m)-0.12%
EPS NY rev (3m)0.18%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)0%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)-2.44%
Revenue NY rev (1m)6.01%
Revenue NY rev (3m)4.6%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 5 | ||
| Fwd PE | 10.28 | ||
| P/S | 3.53 | ||
| P/FCF | 10.95 | ||
| P/OCF | 10.42 | ||
| P/B | 0.58 | ||
| P/tB | 0.58 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 21.92 |
EPS(TTM)12.77
EY20%
EPS(NY)6.21
Fwd EY9.73%
FCF(TTM)5.83
FCFY9.13%
OCF(TTM)6.13
OCFY9.6%
SpS18.07
BVpS110.83
TBVpS110.75
PEG (NY)0.28
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number178.45
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 5.79% | ||
| ROE | 14.15% | ||
| ROCE | 3.55% | ||
| ROIC | 1.99% | ||
| ROICexc | 2.04% | ||
| ROICexgc | 2.04% | ||
| OM | 45.94% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 86.8% | ||
| GM | 49.46% | ||
| FCFM | 32.25% |
ROA(3y)-2.23%
ROA(5y)2.11%
ROE(3y)-5.85%
ROE(5y)4.04%
ROIC(3y)1.76%
ROIC(5y)1.7%
ROICexc(3y)1.79%
ROICexc(5y)1.74%
ROICexgc(3y)1.79%
ROICexgc(5y)1.75%
ROCE(3y)3.13%
ROCE(5y)3.03%
ROICexgc growth 3Y6.99%
ROICexgc growth 5Y-0.28%
ROICexc growth 3Y7.57%
ROICexc growth 5Y-0.05%
OM growth 3Y-4.69%
OM growth 5Y-2.56%
PM growth 3Y-69.54%
PM growth 5Y-45.04%
GM growth 3Y-4.06%
GM growth 5Y-2.36%
F-Score6
Asset Turnover0.07
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.9 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 22.45 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 11.51 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 89.33% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 1.65% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 3.77 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 70.95% | ||
| Profit Quality | 37.16% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.27 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.27 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.76 |
F-Score6
WACC3.07%
ROIC/WACC0.65
Cap/Depr(3y)67.45%
Cap/Depr(5y)56.65%
Cap/Sales(3y)3.16%
Cap/Sales(5y)2.49%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)166.6%
EPS 3Y23.02%
EPS 5Y-3.4%
EPS Q2Q%709.52%
EPS Next Y17.57%
EPS Next 2Y8.79%
EPS Next 3Y6.84%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)7.88%
Revenue growth 3Y10.71%
Revenue growth 5Y10%
Sales Q2Q%59.19%
Revenue Next Year33.66%
Revenue Next 2Y16.73%
Revenue Next 3Y6.79%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y12.32%
EBIT growth 3Y5.52%
EBIT growth 5Y7.18%
EBIT Next Year12.41%
EBIT Next 3Y6.6%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y5.31%
FCF growth 3Y6.85%
FCF growth 5Y6.25%
OCF growth 1Y6.07%
OCF growth 3Y7.26%
OCF growth 5Y6.53%
LEG IMMOBILIEN SE / LEG.DE FAQ
What is the fundamental rating for LEG stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to LEG.DE.
What is the valuation status of LEG IMMOBILIEN SE (LEG.DE) stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 8 / 10 to LEG IMMOBILIEN SE (LEG.DE). This can be considered as Undervalued.
Can you provide the profitability details for LEG IMMOBILIEN SE?
LEG IMMOBILIEN SE (LEG.DE) has a profitability rating of 6 / 10.
What is the valuation of LEG IMMOBILIEN SE based on its PE and PB ratios?
The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for LEG IMMOBILIEN SE (LEG.DE) is 5 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 0.58.
What is the earnings growth outlook for LEG IMMOBILIEN SE?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of LEG IMMOBILIEN SE (LEG.DE) is expected to grow by 17.57% in the next year.