18.3 USD
-0.19 (-1.03%)
18.3 USD
0 (0%)
Taking everything into account, GTX scores 5 out of 10 in our fundamental rating. GTX was compared to 42 industry peers in the Automobile Components industry. GTX has an excellent profitability rating, but there are some minor concerns on its financial health. GTX may be a bit undervalued, certainly considering the very reasonable score on growth
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
- In the past year GTX was profitable.
- GTX had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
- GTX had positive earnings in 4 of the past 5 years.
- GTX had a positive operating cash flow in 4 of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
- GTX's Return On Assets of 13.38% is amongst the best of the industry. GTX outperforms 97.62% of its industry peers.
- Looking at the Return On Invested Capital, with a value of 35.16%, GTX belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 100.00% of the companies in the same industry.
- The Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years for GTX is significantly above the industry average of 9.10%.
- The 3 year average ROIC (33.21%) for GTX is below the current ROIC(35.16%), indicating increased profibility in the last year.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 13.38% | ||
| ROE | N/A | ||
| ROIC | 35.16% |
ROA(3y)4.08%
ROA(5y)3.85%
ROE(3y)N/A
ROE(5y)N/A
ROIC(3y)33.21%
ROIC(5y)28.46%
1.3 Margins
- With an excellent Profit Margin value of 9.22%, GTX belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming 92.86% of the companies in the same industry.
- In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of GTX has declined.
- GTX has a better Operating Margin (13.60%) than 92.86% of its industry peers.
- In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of GTX has remained more or less at the same level.
- The Gross Margin of GTX (20.58%) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
- In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of GTX has remained more or less at the same level.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 13.6% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 9.22% | ||
| GM | 20.58% |
OM growth 3Y-0.69%
OM growth 5Y0.33%
PM growth 3Y35.69%
PM growth 5Y-3.38%
GM growth 3Y1.4%
GM growth 5Y-1%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
- The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), so GTX is creating value.
- The number of shares outstanding for GTX has been reduced compared to 1 year ago.
- Compared to 5 years ago, GTX has more shares outstanding
- The debt/assets ratio for GTX has been reduced compared to a year ago.
2.2 Solvency
- An Altman-Z score of 1.94 indicates that GTX is not a great score, but indicates only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
- GTX has a Altman-Z score (1.94) which is in line with its industry peers.
- GTX has a debt to FCF ratio of 3.94. This is a good value and a sign of high solvency as GTX would need 3.94 years to pay back of all of its debts.
- Looking at the Debt to FCF ratio, with a value of 3.94, GTX is in the better half of the industry, outperforming 71.43% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | N/A | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.94 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.94 |
ROIC/WACC7.32
WACC4.8%
2.3 Liquidity
- GTX has a Current Ratio of 1.02. This is a normal value and indicates that GTX is financially healthy and should not expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
- GTX's Current ratio of 1.02 is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. GTX is outperformed by 85.71% of its industry peers.
- GTX has a Quick Ratio of 1.02. This is a bad value and indicates that GTX is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
- GTX has a Quick ratio of 0.78. This is in the lower half of the industry: GTX underperforms 76.19% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.02 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.78 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
- GTX shows a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has been growing by 53.92%, which is quite impressive.
- The earnings per share for GTX have been decreasing by -19.21% on average. This is quite bad
- The Revenue has decreased by -1.09% in the past year.
- The Revenue has been growing slightly by 1.36% on average over the past years.
EPS 1Y (TTM)53.92%
EPS 3Y-6.91%
EPS 5Y-19.21%
EPS Q2Q%58.33%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-1.09%
Revenue growth 3Y-1.47%
Revenue growth 5Y1.36%
Sales Q2Q%9.2%
3.2 Future
- The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 18.55% on average over the next years. This is quite good.
- Based on estimates for the next years, GTX will show a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 3.17% on average per year.
EPS Next Y17.38%
EPS Next 2Y19.23%
EPS Next 3Y18.55%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year2.21%
Revenue Next 2Y2.66%
Revenue Next 3Y3.17%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
- When comparing the EPS growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
- The Revenue growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
- A Price/Earnings ratio of 11.66 indicates a reasonable valuation of GTX.
- GTX's Price/Earnings ratio is a bit cheaper when compared to the industry. GTX is cheaper than 78.57% of the companies in the same industry.
- When comparing the Price/Earnings ratio of GTX to the average of the S&P500 Index (27.32), we can say GTX is valued rather cheaply.
- Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 10.14, the valuation of GTX can be described as reasonable.
- 76.19% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than GTX, based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio.
- GTX's Price/Forward Earnings ratio indicates a rather cheap valuation when compared to the S&P500 average which is at 24.30.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 11.66 | ||
| Fwd PE | 10.14 |
4.2 Price Multiples
- GTX's Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio is a bit cheaper when compared to the industry. GTX is cheaper than 61.90% of the companies in the same industry.
- 76.19% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than GTX, based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 9.57 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 8.42 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
- The low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
- GTX has a very decent profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
- GTX's earnings are expected to grow with 18.55% in the coming years. This may justify a more expensive valuation.
PEG (NY)0.67
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y19.23%
EPS Next 3Y18.55%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
- GTX has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 1.35%.
- Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 0.61, GTX pays a bit more dividend than its industry peers.
- GTX's Dividend Yield is slightly below the S&P500 average, which is at 1.86.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.35% |
5.2 History
- GTX does not have a reliable dividend history as it only pays dividend since a couple or years.
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
- 11.04% of the earnings are spent on dividend by GTX. This is a low number and sustainable payout ratio.
DP11.04%
EPS Next 2Y19.23%
EPS Next 3Y18.55%
18.3
-0.19 (-1.03%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryGroupAutomobiles & Components
GICS IndustryAutomobile Components
Earnings (Last)10-23 2025-10-23/bmo
Earnings (Next)02-19 2026-02-19/bmo
Inst Owners83.38%
Inst Owner Change0.74%
Ins Owners0.94%
Ins Owner Change0.13%
Market Cap3.56B
Revenue(TTM)3.54B
Net Income(TTM)326.00M
Analysts80
Price Target21.22 (15.96%)
Short Float %4.6%
Short Ratio3.63
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.35% |
Yearly Dividend0
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
DP11.04%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)2
Avg EPS beat(2)14.73%
Min EPS beat(2)13.93%
Max EPS beat(2)15.53%
EPS beat(4)4
Avg EPS beat(4)25.29%
Min EPS beat(4)2.78%
Max EPS beat(4)68.91%
EPS beat(8)6
Avg EPS beat(8)11.87%
EPS beat(12)7
Avg EPS beat(12)-72.4%
EPS beat(16)8
Avg EPS beat(16)-56.05%
Revenue beat(2)1
Avg Revenue beat(2)0.84%
Min Revenue beat(2)-1.53%
Max Revenue beat(2)3.2%
Revenue beat(4)2
Avg Revenue beat(4)0.48%
Min Revenue beat(4)-2.89%
Max Revenue beat(4)3.2%
Revenue beat(8)2
Avg Revenue beat(8)-2.23%
Revenue beat(12)4
Avg Revenue beat(12)-1.88%
Revenue beat(16)6
Avg Revenue beat(16)-1.28%
PT rev (1m)9.47%
PT rev (3m)32.06%
EPS NQ rev (1m)-5.36%
EPS NQ rev (3m)14.24%
EPS NY rev (1m)0.54%
EPS NY rev (3m)10.03%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)-0.07%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)1.38%
Revenue NY rev (1m)-0.03%
Revenue NY rev (3m)1.46%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 11.66 | ||
| Fwd PE | 10.14 | ||
| P/S | 1.01 | ||
| P/FCF | 9.57 | ||
| P/OCF | 8 | ||
| P/B | N/A | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 8.42 |
EPS(TTM)1.57
EY8.58%
EPS(NY)1.81
Fwd EY9.87%
FCF(TTM)1.91
FCFY10.45%
OCF(TTM)2.29
OCFY12.5%
SpS18.19
BVpS-4.18
TBVpS-5.17
PEG (NY)0.67
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham NumberN/A
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 13.38% | ||
| ROE | N/A | ||
| ROCE | 44.66% | ||
| ROIC | 35.16% | ||
| ROICexc | 44.7% | ||
| ROICexgc | 57.89% | ||
| OM | 13.6% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 9.22% | ||
| GM | 20.58% | ||
| FCFM | 10.52% |
ROA(3y)4.08%
ROA(5y)3.85%
ROE(3y)N/A
ROE(5y)N/A
ROIC(3y)33.21%
ROIC(5y)28.46%
ROICexc(3y)40.6%
ROICexc(5y)37.48%
ROICexgc(3y)51.4%
ROICexgc(5y)47.9%
ROCE(3y)42.18%
ROCE(5y)37.44%
ROICexgc growth 3Y-7.1%
ROICexgc growth 5Y-4.26%
ROICexc growth 3Y-5.96%
ROICexc growth 5Y-2.81%
OM growth 3Y-0.69%
OM growth 5Y0.33%
PM growth 3Y35.69%
PM growth 5Y-3.38%
GM growth 3Y1.4%
GM growth 5Y-1%
F-Score8
Asset Turnover1.45
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | N/A | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.94 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 2.54 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 78.49% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 2.06% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 5.01 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 77.53% | ||
| Profit Quality | 114.11% | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.02 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.78 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.94 |
F-Score8
WACC4.8%
ROIC/WACC7.32
Cap/Depr(3y)100.56%
Cap/Depr(5y)94.59%
Cap/Sales(3y)2.43%
Cap/Sales(5y)2.38%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)53.92%
EPS 3Y-6.91%
EPS 5Y-19.21%
EPS Q2Q%58.33%
EPS Next Y17.38%
EPS Next 2Y19.23%
EPS Next 3Y18.55%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-1.09%
Revenue growth 3Y-1.47%
Revenue growth 5Y1.36%
Sales Q2Q%9.2%
Revenue Next Year2.21%
Revenue Next 2Y2.66%
Revenue Next 3Y3.17%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y5.02%
EBIT growth 3Y-2.15%
EBIT growth 5Y1.7%
EBIT Next Year33.45%
EBIT Next 3Y13.61%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-6.3%
FCF growth 3YN/A
FCF growth 5Y17.76%
OCF growth 1Y-4.71%
OCF growth 3YN/A
OCF growth 5Y11.01%
GARRETT MOTION INC / GTX FAQ
What is the ChartMill fundamental rating of GARRETT MOTION INC (GTX) stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to GTX.
What is the valuation status of GARRETT MOTION INC (GTX) stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 7 / 10 to GARRETT MOTION INC (GTX). This can be considered as Undervalued.
What is the profitability of GTX stock?
GARRETT MOTION INC (GTX) has a profitability rating of 7 / 10.
What is the earnings growth outlook for GARRETT MOTION INC?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of GARRETT MOTION INC (GTX) is expected to grow by 17.38% in the next year.
How sustainable is the dividend of GARRETT MOTION INC (GTX) stock?
The dividend rating of GARRETT MOTION INC (GTX) is 3 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 11.04%.