Logo image of GTX

GARRETT MOTION INC (GTX) Stock Fundamental Analysis

NASDAQ:GTX - Nasdaq - US3665051054 - Common Stock - Currency: USD

10.86  +0.66 (+6.47%)

After market: 10.86 0 (0%)

Fundamental Rating

5

Overall GTX gets a fundamental rating of 5 out of 10. We evaluated GTX against 81 industry peers in the Automobile Components industry. While GTX has a great profitability rating, there are quite some concerns on its financial health. GTX has a correct valuation and a medium growth rate.


Dividend Valuation Growth Profitability Health

Quickly go to:

7

1. Profitability

1.1 Basic Checks

In the past year GTX was profitable.
In the past year GTX had a positive cash flow from operations.
GTX had positive earnings in 4 of the past 5 years.
Of the past 5 years GTX 4 years had a positive operating cash flow.
GTX Yearly Net Income VS EBIT VS OCF VS FCFGTX Yearly Net Income VS EBIT VS OCF VS FCFYearly Net Income VS EBIT VS OCF VS FCF 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 500M -500M 1B

1.2 Ratios

Looking at the Return On Assets, with a value of 12.39%, GTX belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 97.53% of the companies in the same industry.
The Return On Invested Capital of GTX (36.20%) is better than 100.00% of its industry peers.
GTX had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 33.21%. This is significantly above the industry average of 8.98%.
The 3 year average ROIC (33.21%) for GTX is below the current ROIC(36.20%), indicating increased profibility in the last year.
Industry RankSector Rank
ROA 12.39%
ROE N/A
ROIC 36.2%
ROA(3y)4.08%
ROA(5y)3.85%
ROE(3y)N/A
ROE(5y)N/A
ROIC(3y)33.21%
ROIC(5y)28.46%
GTX Yearly ROA, ROE, ROICGTX Yearly ROA, ROE, ROICYearly ROA, ROE, ROIC 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 20 -20 40 -40

1.3 Margins

Looking at the Profit Margin, with a value of 8.12%, GTX belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 95.06% of the companies in the same industry.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of GTX has declined.
GTX has a better Operating Margin (13.21%) than 96.30% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of GTX has remained more or less at the same level.
GTX has a Gross Margin of 20.29%. This is in the lower half of the industry: GTX underperforms 70.37% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of GTX has remained more or less at the same level.
Industry RankSector Rank
OM 13.21%
PM (TTM) 8.12%
GM 20.29%
OM growth 3Y-0.69%
OM growth 5Y0.33%
PM growth 3Y35.69%
PM growth 5Y-3.38%
GM growth 3Y1.4%
GM growth 5Y-1%
GTX Yearly Profit, Operating, Gross MarginsGTX Yearly Profit, Operating, Gross MarginsYearly Profit, Operating, Gross Margins 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 20 -20

More info and screens

2

2. Health

2.1 Basic Checks

GTX has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), which means it is creating value.
The number of shares outstanding for GTX has been reduced compared to 1 year ago.
GTX has more shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
Compared to 1 year ago, GTX has an improved debt to assets ratio.
GTX Yearly Shares OutstandingGTX Yearly Shares OutstandingYearly Shares Outstanding 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 50M 100M 150M 200M
GTX Yearly Total Debt VS Total AssetsGTX Yearly Total Debt VS Total AssetsYearly Total Debt VS Total Assets 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 1B 2B 3B

2.2 Solvency

GTX has an Altman-Z score of 1.58. This is a bad value and indicates that GTX is not financially healthy and even has some risk of bankruptcy.
With a Altman-Z score value of 1.58, GTX is not doing good in the industry: 81.48% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
GTX has a debt to FCF ratio of 4.64. This is a neutral value as GTX would need 4.64 years to pay back of all of its debts.
Looking at the Debt to FCF ratio, with a value of 4.64, GTX is doing worse than 60.49% of the companies in the same industry.
Industry RankSector Rank
Debt/Equity N/A
Debt/FCF 4.64
Altman-Z 1.58
ROIC/WACC7.45
WACC4.86%
GTX Yearly LT Debt VS Equity VS FCFGTX Yearly LT Debt VS Equity VS FCFYearly LT Debt VS Equity VS FCF 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 1B -1B -2B

2.3 Liquidity

GTX has a Current Ratio of 0.93. This is a bad value and indicates that GTX is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
With a Current ratio value of 0.93, GTX is not doing good in the industry: 95.06% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
A Quick Ratio of 0.71 indicates that GTX may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
With a Quick ratio value of 0.71, GTX is not doing good in the industry: 91.36% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
Industry RankSector Rank
Current Ratio 0.93
Quick Ratio 0.71
GTX Yearly Current Assets VS Current LiabilitesGTX Yearly Current Assets VS Current LiabilitesYearly Current Assets VS Current Liabilites 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 500M 1B 1.5B 2B 2.5B

More info and screens

5

3. Growth

3.1 Past

The Earnings Per Share has grown by an impressive 212.17% over the past year.
The earnings per share for GTX have been decreasing by -19.21% on average. This is quite bad
The Revenue for GTX has decreased by -10.58% in the past year. This is quite bad
Measured over the past years, GTX shows a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 1.36% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)212.17%
EPS 3Y-6.91%
EPS 5Y-19.21%
EPS Q2Q%7.14%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-10.58%
Revenue growth 3Y-1.47%
Revenue growth 5Y1.36%
Sales Q2Q%-4.04%

3.2 Future

The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 11.03% on average over the next years. This is quite good.
GTX is expected to show a small growth in Revenue. In the coming years, the Revenue will grow by 2.95% yearly.
EPS Next Y-0.27%
EPS Next 2Y11.03%
EPS Next 3YN/A
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year-1.73%
Revenue Next 2Y2.95%
Revenue Next 3YN/A
Revenue Next 5YN/A

3.3 Evolution

The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
GTX Yearly Revenue VS EstimatesGTX Yearly Revenue VS EstimatesYearly Revenue VS Estimates 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 1B 2B 3B
GTX Yearly EPS VS EstimatesGTX Yearly EPS VS EstimatesYearly EPS VS Estimates 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 0 1 -1 2 3 4

More info and screens

6

4. Valuation

4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio

With a Price/Earnings ratio of 8.42, the valuation of GTX can be described as very reasonable.
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, GTX is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 72.84% of the companies are valued more expensively.
GTX is valuated cheaply when we compare the Price/Earnings ratio to 28.22, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
A Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 6.94 indicates a rather cheap valuation of GTX.
72.84% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than GTX, based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio.
The average S&P500 Price/Forward Earnings ratio is at 20.86. GTX is valued rather cheaply when compared to this.
Industry RankSector Rank
PE 8.42
Fwd PE 6.94
GTX Price Earnings VS Forward Price EarningsGTX Price Earnings VS Forward Price Earnings ChartPrice Earnings - Forward Price Earnings PE FPE 10 20 30 40

4.2 Price Multiples

The rest of the industry has a similar Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio as GTX.
Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, GTX is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 74.07% of the companies are valued more expensively.
Industry RankSector Rank
P/FCF 7.01
EV/EBITDA 6.5
GTX Per share dataGTX EPS, Sales, OCF, FCF, BookValue per sharePer Share Data Per Share 0 5 10 15

4.3 Compensation for Growth

The decent profitability rating of GTX may justify a higher PE ratio.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y11.03%
EPS Next 3YN/A

More info and screens

2

5. Dividend

5.1 Amount

GTX has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 2.35%.
GTX's Dividend Yield is comparable with the industry average which is at 4.38.
Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 2.44, GTX has a dividend comparable with the average S&P500 company.
Industry RankSector Rank
Dividend Yield 2.35%

5.2 History

GTX is new to the dividend game and has less than 3 years of track record.
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
GTX Yearly Dividends per shareGTX Yearly Dividends per shareYearly Dividends per share 2025 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05

5.3 Sustainability

DP0%
EPS Next 2Y11.03%
EPS Next 3YN/A
GTX Yearly Income VS Free CF VS DividendGTX Yearly Income VS Free CF VS DividendYearly Income VS Free CF VS Dividend 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 0 500M -500M 1B

More info and screens

GARRETT MOTION INC

NASDAQ:GTX (5/2/2025, 8:00:01 PM)

After market: 10.86 0 (0%)

10.86

+0.66 (+6.47%)

Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryGroupAutomobiles & Components
GICS IndustryAutomobile Components
Earnings (Last)05-01 2025-05-01/bmo
Earnings (Next)07-23 2025-07-23
Inst Owners76.04%
Inst Owner Change-0.06%
Ins Owners0.72%
Ins Owner Change1.12%
Market Cap2.22B
Analysts80
Price Target12.24 (12.71%)
Short Float %4.33%
Short Ratio4.34
Dividend
Industry RankSector Rank
Dividend Yield 2.35%
Yearly Dividend0
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
DP0%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-Date01-15 2025-01-15 (0.06)
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)1
Avg EPS beat(2)24.8%
Min EPS beat(2)-19.31%
Max EPS beat(2)68.91%
EPS beat(4)3
Avg EPS beat(4)15.71%
Min EPS beat(4)-19.31%
Max EPS beat(4)68.91%
EPS beat(8)4
Avg EPS beat(8)-111.04%
EPS beat(12)4
Avg EPS beat(12)-81.81%
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)0
Avg Revenue beat(2)-3.39%
Min Revenue beat(2)-3.9%
Max Revenue beat(2)-2.89%
Revenue beat(4)0
Avg Revenue beat(4)-5.39%
Min Revenue beat(4)-9.67%
Max Revenue beat(4)-2.89%
Revenue beat(8)2
Avg Revenue beat(8)-2.63%
Revenue beat(12)4
Avg Revenue beat(12)-2.01%
Revenue beat(16)5
Avg Revenue beat(16)-1.39%
PT rev (1m)0%
PT rev (3m)0%
EPS NQ rev (1m)0.87%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-2.53%
EPS NY rev (1m)-3.8%
EPS NY rev (3m)-3.58%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)0.84%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)-3.6%
Revenue NY rev (1m)-1.28%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-5.15%
Valuation
Industry RankSector Rank
PE 8.42
Fwd PE 6.94
P/S 0.64
P/FCF 7.01
P/OCF 5.44
P/B N/A
P/tB N/A
EV/EBITDA 6.5
EPS(TTM)1.29
EY11.88%
EPS(NY)1.57
Fwd EY14.42%
FCF(TTM)1.55
FCFY14.27%
OCF(TTM)1.99
OCFY18.37%
SpS16.99
BVpS-3.29
TBVpS-4.23
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
Profitability
Industry RankSector Rank
ROA 12.39%
ROE N/A
ROCE 45.99%
ROIC 36.2%
ROICexc 41.39%
ROICexgc 53.13%
OM 13.21%
PM (TTM) 8.12%
GM 20.29%
FCFM 9.12%
ROA(3y)4.08%
ROA(5y)3.85%
ROE(3y)N/A
ROE(5y)N/A
ROIC(3y)33.21%
ROIC(5y)28.46%
ROICexc(3y)40.6%
ROICexc(5y)37.48%
ROICexgc(3y)51.4%
ROICexgc(5y)47.9%
ROCE(3y)42.18%
ROCE(5y)37.44%
ROICexcg growth 3Y-7.1%
ROICexcg growth 5Y-4.26%
ROICexc growth 3Y-5.96%
ROICexc growth 5Y-2.81%
OM growth 3Y-0.69%
OM growth 5Y0.33%
PM growth 3Y35.69%
PM growth 5Y-3.38%
GM growth 3Y1.4%
GM growth 5Y-1%
F-Score7
Asset Turnover1.53
Health
Industry RankSector Rank
Debt/Equity N/A
Debt/FCF 4.64
Debt/EBITDA 2.67
Cap/Depr 101.11%
Cap/Sales 2.62%
Interest Coverage 5.22
Cash Conversion 74.32%
Profit Quality 112.41%
Current Ratio 0.93
Quick Ratio 0.71
Altman-Z 1.58
F-Score7
WACC4.86%
ROIC/WACC7.45
Cap/Depr(3y)100.56%
Cap/Depr(5y)94.59%
Cap/Sales(3y)2.43%
Cap/Sales(5y)2.38%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)212.17%
EPS 3Y-6.91%
EPS 5Y-19.21%
EPS Q2Q%7.14%
EPS Next Y-0.27%
EPS Next 2Y11.03%
EPS Next 3YN/A
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-10.58%
Revenue growth 3Y-1.47%
Revenue growth 5Y1.36%
Sales Q2Q%-4.04%
Revenue Next Year-1.73%
Revenue Next 2Y2.95%
Revenue Next 3YN/A
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y-8.93%
EBIT growth 3Y-2.15%
EBIT growth 5Y1.7%
EBIT Next Year22.73%
EBIT Next 3YN/A
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-17.02%
FCF growth 3YN/A
FCF growth 5Y17.76%
OCF growth 1Y-12.26%
OCF growth 3YN/A
OCF growth 5Y11.01%