GARRETT MOTION INC (GTX) Stock Fundamental Analysis
USA - NASDAQ:GTX - US3665051054 - Common Stock
16.64 USD
+0.18 (+1.09%)
We assign a fundamental rating of 5 out of 10 to GTX. GTX was compared to 82 industry peers in the Automobile Components industry. While GTX has a great profitability rating, there are some minor concerns on its financial health. GTX scores decently on growth, while it is valued quite cheap. This could make an interesting combination.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
GTX had positive earnings in the past year.
GTX had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
Of the past 5 years GTX 4 years were profitable.
Of the past 5 years GTX 4 years had a positive operating cash flow.
1.2 Ratios
Looking at the Return On Assets, with a value of 13.38%, GTX belongs to the top of the industry, outperforming 96.34% of the companies in the same industry.
GTX has a Return On Invested Capital of 35.16%. This is amongst the best in the industry. GTX outperforms 100.00% of its industry peers.
GTX had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 33.21%. This is significantly above the industry average of 8.55%.
The last Return On Invested Capital (35.16%) for GTX is above the 3 year average (33.21%), which is a sign of increasing profitability.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 13.38% | ||
| ROE | N/A | ||
| ROIC | 35.16% |
ROA(3y)4.08%
ROA(5y)3.85%
ROE(3y)N/A
ROE(5y)N/A
ROIC(3y)33.21%
ROIC(5y)28.46%
1.3 Margins
With an excellent Profit Margin value of 9.22%, GTX belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming 96.34% of the companies in the same industry.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of GTX has declined.
GTX has a better Operating Margin (13.60%) than 96.34% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of GTX has remained more or less at the same level.
GTX has a worse Gross Margin (20.58%) than 69.51% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of GTX has remained more or less at the same level.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 13.6% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 9.22% | ||
| GM | 20.58% |
OM growth 3Y-0.69%
OM growth 5Y0.33%
PM growth 3Y35.69%
PM growth 5Y-3.38%
GM growth 3Y1.4%
GM growth 5Y-1%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) well above the Cost of Capital (WACC), GTX is creating value.
Compared to 1 year ago, GTX has less shares outstanding
Compared to 5 years ago, GTX has more shares outstanding
The debt/assets ratio for GTX has been reduced compared to a year ago.
2.2 Solvency
GTX has an Altman-Z score of 1.89. This is not the best score and indicates that GTX is in the grey zone with still only limited risk for bankruptcy at the moment.
Looking at the Altman-Z score, with a value of 1.89, GTX is doing worse than 76.83% of the companies in the same industry.
The Debt to FCF ratio of GTX is 3.94, which is a good value as it means it would take GTX, 3.94 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
GTX has a better Debt to FCF ratio (3.94) than 85.37% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | N/A | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.94 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.89 |
ROIC/WACC7.34
WACC4.79%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 1.02 indicates that GTX should not have too much problems paying its short term obligations.
GTX has a worse Current ratio (1.02) than 91.46% of its industry peers.
GTX has a Quick Ratio of 1.02. This is a bad value and indicates that GTX is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
Looking at the Quick ratio, with a value of 0.78, GTX is doing worse than 85.37% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.02 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.78 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The Earnings Per Share has grown by an impressive 53.92% over the past year.
The earnings per share for GTX have been decreasing by -19.21% on average. This is quite bad
GTX shows a decrease in Revenue. In the last year, the revenue decreased by -1.09%.
The Revenue has been growing slightly by 1.36% on average over the past years.
EPS 1Y (TTM)53.92%
EPS 3Y-6.91%
EPS 5Y-19.21%
EPS Q2Q%58.33%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-1.09%
Revenue growth 3Y-1.47%
Revenue growth 5Y1.36%
Sales Q2Q%9.2%
3.2 Future
The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 19.14% on average over the next years. This is quite good.
Based on estimates for the next years, GTX will show a small growth in Revenue. The Revenue will grow by 3.10% on average per year.
EPS Next Y16.75%
EPS Next 2Y19.55%
EPS Next 3Y19.14%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year2.01%
Revenue Next 2Y2.59%
Revenue Next 3Y3.1%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
The Revenue growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
With a Price/Earnings ratio of 10.60, the valuation of GTX can be described as very reasonable.
GTX's Price/Earnings ratio is a bit cheaper when compared to the industry. GTX is cheaper than 70.73% of the companies in the same industry.
When comparing the Price/Earnings ratio of GTX to the average of the S&P500 Index (25.56), we can say GTX is valued rather cheaply.
With a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 9.17, the valuation of GTX can be described as very reasonable.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, GTX is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 68.29% of the companies are valued more expensively.
Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 34.62, GTX is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 10.6 | ||
| Fwd PE | 9.17 |
4.2 Price Multiples
GTX's Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio is in line with the industry average.
Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, GTX is valued a bit cheaper than 78.05% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 9.02 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 7.94 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
GTX's low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
The decent profitability rating of GTX may justify a higher PE ratio.
A more expensive valuation may be justified as GTX's earnings are expected to grow with 19.14% in the coming years.
PEG (NY)0.63
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y19.55%
EPS Next 3Y19.14%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
GTX has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 1.52%.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 4.20, GTX has a dividend in line with its industry peers.
Compared to the average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 2.44, GTX is paying slightly less dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.52% |
5.2 History
GTX is new to the dividend game and has less than 3 years of track record.
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
5.3 Sustainability
11.04% of the earnings are spent on dividend by GTX. This is a low number and sustainable payout ratio.
DP11.04%
EPS Next 2Y19.55%
EPS Next 3Y19.14%
NASDAQ:GTX (11/18/2025, 2:02:08 PM)
16.64
+0.18 (+1.09%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryGroupAutomobiles & Components
GICS IndustryAutomobile Components
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners77.02%
Inst Owner Change-4.24%
Ins Owners0.9%
Ins Owner Change0.88%
Market Cap3.35B
Revenue(TTM)3.54B
Net Income(TTM)326.00M
Analysts80
Price Target19.13 (14.96%)
Short Float %4.4%
Short Ratio2.38
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.52% |
Yearly Dividend0
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
DP11.04%
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-Date
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)2
Avg EPS beat(2)14.73%
Min EPS beat(2)13.93%
Max EPS beat(2)15.53%
EPS beat(4)4
Avg EPS beat(4)25.29%
Min EPS beat(4)2.78%
Max EPS beat(4)68.91%
EPS beat(8)6
Avg EPS beat(8)11.87%
EPS beat(12)7
Avg EPS beat(12)-72.4%
EPS beat(16)8
Avg EPS beat(16)-56.05%
Revenue beat(2)1
Avg Revenue beat(2)0.84%
Min Revenue beat(2)-1.53%
Max Revenue beat(2)3.2%
Revenue beat(4)2
Avg Revenue beat(4)0.48%
Min Revenue beat(4)-2.89%
Max Revenue beat(4)3.2%
Revenue beat(8)2
Avg Revenue beat(8)-2.23%
Revenue beat(12)4
Avg Revenue beat(12)-1.88%
Revenue beat(16)6
Avg Revenue beat(16)-1.28%
PT rev (1m)19.05%
PT rev (3m)33.93%
EPS NQ rev (1m)20.71%
EPS NQ rev (3m)15.12%
EPS NY rev (1m)9.43%
EPS NY rev (3m)12.32%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)1.91%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)3.04%
Revenue NY rev (1m)1.27%
Revenue NY rev (3m)1.38%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 10.6 | ||
| Fwd PE | 9.17 | ||
| P/S | 0.95 | ||
| P/FCF | 9.02 | ||
| P/OCF | 7.54 | ||
| P/B | N/A | ||
| P/tB | N/A | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 7.94 |
EPS(TTM)1.57
EY9.44%
EPS(NY)1.81
Fwd EY10.91%
FCF(TTM)1.85
FCFY11.09%
OCF(TTM)2.21
OCFY13.27%
SpS17.55
BVpS-4.03
TBVpS-4.99
PEG (NY)0.63
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham NumberN/A
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 13.38% | ||
| ROE | N/A | ||
| ROCE | 44.66% | ||
| ROIC | 35.16% | ||
| ROICexc | 44.7% | ||
| ROICexgc | 57.89% | ||
| OM | 13.6% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 9.22% | ||
| GM | 20.58% | ||
| FCFM | 10.52% |
ROA(3y)4.08%
ROA(5y)3.85%
ROE(3y)N/A
ROE(5y)N/A
ROIC(3y)33.21%
ROIC(5y)28.46%
ROICexc(3y)40.6%
ROICexc(5y)37.48%
ROICexgc(3y)51.4%
ROICexgc(5y)47.9%
ROCE(3y)42.18%
ROCE(5y)37.44%
ROICexgc growth 3Y-7.1%
ROICexgc growth 5Y-4.26%
ROICexc growth 3Y-5.96%
ROICexc growth 5Y-2.81%
OM growth 3Y-0.69%
OM growth 5Y0.33%
PM growth 3Y35.69%
PM growth 5Y-3.38%
GM growth 3Y1.4%
GM growth 5Y-1%
F-Score8
Asset Turnover1.45
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | N/A | ||
| Debt/FCF | 3.94 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 2.54 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 78.49% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 2.06% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 5.01 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 77.53% | ||
| Profit Quality | 114.11% | ||
| Current Ratio | 1.02 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.78 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.89 |
F-Score8
WACC4.79%
ROIC/WACC7.34
Cap/Depr(3y)100.56%
Cap/Depr(5y)94.59%
Cap/Sales(3y)2.43%
Cap/Sales(5y)2.38%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)53.92%
EPS 3Y-6.91%
EPS 5Y-19.21%
EPS Q2Q%58.33%
EPS Next Y16.75%
EPS Next 2Y19.55%
EPS Next 3Y19.14%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-1.09%
Revenue growth 3Y-1.47%
Revenue growth 5Y1.36%
Sales Q2Q%9.2%
Revenue Next Year2.01%
Revenue Next 2Y2.59%
Revenue Next 3Y3.1%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y5.02%
EBIT growth 3Y-2.15%
EBIT growth 5Y1.7%
EBIT Next Year29.95%
EBIT Next 3Y11.99%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y-6.3%
FCF growth 3YN/A
FCF growth 5Y17.76%
OCF growth 1Y-4.71%
OCF growth 3YN/A
OCF growth 5Y11.01%
GARRETT MOTION INC / GTX FAQ
What is the ChartMill fundamental rating of GARRETT MOTION INC (GTX) stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to GTX.
What is the valuation status for GTX stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 7 / 10 to GARRETT MOTION INC (GTX). This can be considered as Undervalued.
What is the profitability of GTX stock?
GARRETT MOTION INC (GTX) has a profitability rating of 7 / 10.
What is the financial health of GARRETT MOTION INC (GTX) stock?
The financial health rating of GARRETT MOTION INC (GTX) is 4 / 10.
Can you provide the expected EPS growth for GTX stock?
The Earnings per Share (EPS) of GARRETT MOTION INC (GTX) is expected to grow by 16.75% in the next year.