FERROVIAL SE (FER.AS) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Europe - Euronext Amsterdam - AMS:FER - NL0015001FS8 - Common Stock
56.28 EUR
+0.58 (+1.04%)
Overall FER gets a fundamental rating of 4 out of 10. We evaluated FER against 45 industry peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. FER has an excellent profitability rating, but there are concerns on its financial health. FER is valued expensive and it does not seem to be growing.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
FER had positive earnings in the past year.
FER had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
Of the past 5 years FER 4 years were profitable.
FER had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
The Return On Assets of FER (12.67%) is better than 93.33% of its industry peers.
FER has a better Return On Equity (57.04%) than 91.11% of its industry peers.
FER has a Return On Invested Capital of 3.45%. This is in the lower half of the industry: FER underperforms 77.78% of its industry peers.
FER had an Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years of 2.22%. This is significantly below the industry average of 10.78%.
The last Return On Invested Capital (3.45%) for FER is above the 3 year average (2.22%), which is a sign of increasing profitability.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 12.67% | ||
| ROE | 57.04% | ||
| ROIC | 3.45% |
ROA(3y)4.52%
ROA(5y)3.3%
ROE(3y)23.24%
ROE(5y)17.1%
ROIC(3y)2.22%
ROIC(5y)1.79%
1.3 Margins
FER has a Profit Margin of 35.99%. This is amongst the best in the industry. FER outperforms 95.56% of its industry peers.
FER's Profit Margin has improved in the last couple of years.
FER has a Operating Margin of 10.13%. This is in the better half of the industry: FER outperforms 73.33% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of FER has grown nicely.
FER's Gross Margin of 87.83% is amongst the best of the industry. FER outperforms 100.00% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of FER has grown nicely.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 10.13% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 35.99% | ||
| GM | 87.83% |
OM growth 3Y26.04%
OM growth 5YN/A
PM growth 3Y27.17%
PM growth 5Y52.49%
GM growth 3Y4.45%
GM growth 5Y4.25%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) below the Cost of Capital (WACC), FER is destroying value.
The number of shares outstanding for FER has been reduced compared to 1 year ago.
FER has less shares outstanding than it did 5 years ago.
Compared to 1 year ago, FER has an improved debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
Based on the Altman-Z score of 1.80, we must say that FER is in the distress zone and has some risk of bankruptcy.
The Altman-Z score of FER (1.80) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
The Debt to FCF ratio of FER is 10.03, which is on the high side as it means it would take FER, 10.03 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
The Debt to FCF ratio of FER (10.03) is worse than 60.00% of its industry peers.
FER has a Debt/Equity ratio of 1.72. This is a high value indicating a heavy dependency on external financing.
FER has a worse Debt to Equity ratio (1.72) than 73.33% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.72 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 10.03 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.8 |
ROIC/WACC0.55
WACC6.31%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 0.94 indicates that FER may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
FER's Current ratio of 0.94 is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. FER is outperformed by 73.33% of its industry peers.
FER has a Quick Ratio of 0.94. This is a bad value and indicates that FER is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
FER's Quick ratio of 0.86 is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. FER is outperformed by 64.44% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.94 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.86 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The Earnings Per Share has grown by an impressive 22.70% over the past year.
The Earnings Per Share has been growing slightly by 3.65% on average over the past years.
The Revenue for FER has decreased by -52.11% in the past year. This is quite bad
The Revenue for FER have been decreasing by -16.35% on average. This is quite bad
EPS 1Y (TTM)22.7%
EPS 3Y3.65%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%N/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-52.11%
Revenue growth 3Y-16.35%
Revenue growth 5YN/A
Sales Q2Q%2.78%
3.2 Future
Based on estimates for the next years, FER will show a very negative growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS will decrease by -13.76% on average per year.
The Revenue is expected to decrease by -9.43% on average over the next years.
EPS Next Y-55.78%
EPS Next 2Y-18.72%
EPS Next 3Y-43.08%
EPS Next 5Y-13.76%
Revenue Next Year0.71%
Revenue Next 2Y-30.82%
Revenue Next 3Y-19.97%
Revenue Next 5Y-9.43%
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
When comparing the Revenue growth rate of the last years to the growth rate of the upcoming years, we see that the growth is accelerating.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
FER is valuated quite expensively with a Price/Earnings ratio of 106.19.
FER's Price/Earnings ratio is a bit more expensive when compared to the industry. FER is more expensive than 77.78% of the companies in the same industry.
When comparing the Price/Earnings ratio of FER to the average of the S&P500 Index (26.15), we can say FER is valued expensively.
With a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 160.43, FER can be considered very expensive at the moment.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, FER is valued expensively inside the industry as 86.67% of the companies are valued cheaper.
The average S&P500 Price/Forward Earnings ratio is at 36.22. FER is valued rather expensively when compared to this.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 106.19 | ||
| Fwd PE | 160.43 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio of FER indicates a slightly more expensive valuation: FER is more expensive than 77.78% of the companies listed in the same industry.
Based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio, FER is valued a bit more expensive than 64.44% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 36 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 35.85 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
FER has an outstanding profitability rating, which may justify a higher PE ratio.
FER's earnings are expected to decrease with -43.08% in the coming years. This may justify a cheaper valuation.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y-18.72%
EPS Next 3Y-43.08%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 1.41%, FER has a reasonable but not impressive dividend return.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 3.64, FER is paying slightly less dividend.
Compared to the average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 2.32, FER is paying slightly less dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.41% |
5.2 History
The dividend of FER decreases each year by -10.17%.
Dividend Growth(5Y)-10.17%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
5.3 Sustainability
FER pays out 3.63% of its income as dividend. This is a sustainable payout ratio.
FER's earnings and Dividend Rate are declining. This means the current dividend is most likely not sustainable.
DP3.63%
EPS Next 2Y-18.72%
EPS Next 3Y-43.08%
AMS:FER (12/2/2025, 7:00:00 PM)
56.28
+0.58 (+1.04%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorIndustrials
GICS IndustryGroupCapital Goods
GICS IndustryConstruction & Engineering
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners50.53%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners32.7%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap41.30B
Revenue(TTM)5.15B
Net Income(TTM)3.37B
Analysts76
Price Target55.25 (-1.83%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.41% |
Yearly Dividend0.18
Dividend Growth(5Y)-10.17%
DP3.63%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years1
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)1
Avg Revenue beat(2)100.85%
Min Revenue beat(2)-3.79%
Max Revenue beat(2)205.49%
Revenue beat(4)2
Avg Revenue beat(4)50.7%
Min Revenue beat(4)-3.79%
Max Revenue beat(4)205.49%
Revenue beat(8)5
Avg Revenue beat(8)26.51%
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)11.5%
PT rev (3m)14.9%
EPS NQ rev (1m)0%
EPS NQ rev (3m)4.19%
EPS NY rev (1m)-3.09%
EPS NY rev (3m)6.02%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)0%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)-2.59%
Revenue NY rev (1m)-0.69%
Revenue NY rev (3m)-1.15%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 106.19 | ||
| Fwd PE | 160.43 | ||
| P/S | 4.42 | ||
| P/FCF | 36 | ||
| P/OCF | 28.98 | ||
| P/B | 7 | ||
| P/tB | 7.76 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 35.85 |
EPS(TTM)0.53
EY0.94%
EPS(NY)0.35
Fwd EY0.62%
FCF(TTM)1.56
FCFY2.78%
OCF(TTM)1.94
OCFY3.45%
SpS12.74
BVpS8.04
TBVpS7.25
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number9.79
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 12.67% | ||
| ROE | 57.04% | ||
| ROCE | 4.6% | ||
| ROIC | 3.45% | ||
| ROICexc | 4% | ||
| ROICexgc | 4.14% | ||
| OM | 10.13% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 35.99% | ||
| GM | 87.83% | ||
| FCFM | 12.27% |
ROA(3y)4.52%
ROA(5y)3.3%
ROE(3y)23.24%
ROE(5y)17.1%
ROIC(3y)2.22%
ROIC(5y)1.79%
ROICexc(3y)2.87%
ROICexc(5y)2.44%
ROICexgc(3y)2.98%
ROICexgc(5y)2.53%
ROCE(3y)2.96%
ROCE(5y)2.38%
ROICexgc growth 3Y23.54%
ROICexgc growth 5YN/A
ROICexc growth 3Y23.9%
ROICexc growth 5YN/A
OM growth 3Y26.04%
OM growth 5YN/A
PM growth 3Y27.17%
PM growth 5Y52.49%
GM growth 3Y4.45%
GM growth 5Y4.25%
F-Score7
Asset Turnover0.35
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.72 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 10.03 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 7.3 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 62.19% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 2.97% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 2 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 102.22% | ||
| Profit Quality | 34.09% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.94 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.86 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.8 |
F-Score7
WACC6.31%
ROIC/WACC0.55
Cap/Depr(3y)34.82%
Cap/Depr(5y)40.43%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.58%
Cap/Sales(5y)1.66%
Profit Quality(3y)249.79%
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)22.7%
EPS 3Y3.65%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%N/A
EPS Next Y-55.78%
EPS Next 2Y-18.72%
EPS Next 3Y-43.08%
EPS Next 5Y-13.76%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)-52.11%
Revenue growth 3Y-16.35%
Revenue growth 5YN/A
Sales Q2Q%2.78%
Revenue Next Year0.71%
Revenue Next 2Y-30.82%
Revenue Next 3Y-19.97%
Revenue Next 5Y-9.43%
EBIT growth 1Y21.25%
EBIT growth 3Y38.38%
EBIT growth 5YN/A
EBIT Next Year56.32%
EBIT Next 3Y22.82%
EBIT Next 5Y14.35%
FCF growth 1Y15.28%
FCF growth 3Y24.87%
FCF growth 5Y2.94%
OCF growth 1Y29.55%
OCF growth 3Y24.37%
OCF growth 5Y2.81%
FERROVIAL SE / FER.AS FAQ
What is the fundamental rating for FER stock?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 4 / 10 to FER.AS.
What is the valuation status of FERROVIAL SE (FER.AS) stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 1 / 10 to FERROVIAL SE (FER.AS). This can be considered as Overvalued.
Can you provide the profitability details for FERROVIAL SE?
FERROVIAL SE (FER.AS) has a profitability rating of 8 / 10.
What is the valuation of FERROVIAL SE based on its PE and PB ratios?
The Price/Earnings (PE) ratio for FERROVIAL SE (FER.AS) is 106.19 and the Price/Book (PB) ratio is 7.
How financially healthy is FERROVIAL SE?
The financial health rating of FERROVIAL SE (FER.AS) is 2 / 10.