BOUYGUES SA (EN.PA)
FR0000120503 - Common Stock
EN gets a fundamental rating of 4 out of 10. The analysis compared the fundamentals against 37 industry peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. While EN is still in line with the averages on profitability rating, there are concerns on its financial health. EN scores decently on growth, while it is valued quite cheap. This could make an interesting combination. EN also has an excellent dividend rating.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year EN was profitable.
In the past year EN had a positive cash flow from operations.
EN had positive earnings in each of the past 5 years.
In the past 5 years EN always reported a positive cash flow from operatings.
1.2 Ratios
The Return On Assets of EN (1.71%) is worse than 61.11% of its industry peers.
With a Return On Equity value of 8.40%, EN is not doing good in the industry: 61.11% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
EN has a Return On Invested Capital (5.01%) which is in line with its industry peers.
Measured over the past 3 years, the Average Return On Invested Capital for EN is below the industry average of 8.89%.
The last Return On Invested Capital (5.01%) for EN is above the 3 year average (4.66%), which is a sign of increasing profitability.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.71% | ||
| ROE | 8.4% | ||
| ROIC | 5.01% |
ROA(3y)1.95%
ROA(5y)2.11%
ROE(3y)8.81%
ROE(5y)8.9%
ROIC(3y)4.66%
ROIC(5y)4.8%
1.3 Margins
EN has a Profit Margin of 1.83%. This is in the lower half of the industry: EN underperforms 63.89% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of EN has declined.
EN has a Operating Margin of 3.90%. This is in the lower half of the industry: EN underperforms 61.11% of its industry peers.
EN's Operating Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
EN has a better Gross Margin (53.91%) than 72.22% of its industry peers.
EN's Gross Margin has been stable in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 3.9% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 1.83% | ||
| GM | 53.91% |
OM growth 3Y0.11%
OM growth 5Y-6.93%
PM growth 3Y-2.55%
PM growth 5Y-12.78%
GM growth 3Y-1.04%
GM growth 5Y0.25%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is just above the Cost of Capital (WACC), so EN is still creating some value.
The number of shares outstanding for EN has been increased compared to 1 year ago.
The number of shares outstanding for EN has been increased compared to 5 years ago.
Compared to 1 year ago, EN has an improved debt to assets ratio.
2.2 Solvency
EN has an Altman-Z score of 1.17. This is a bad value and indicates that EN is not financially healthy and even has some risk of bankruptcy.
EN has a worse Altman-Z score (1.17) than 80.56% of its industry peers.
EN has a debt to FCF ratio of 5.41. This is a neutral value as EN would need 5.41 years to pay back of all of its debts.
The Debt to FCF ratio of EN (5.41) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
EN has a Debt/Equity ratio of 1.12. This is a high value indicating a heavy dependency on external financing.
EN has a worse Debt to Equity ratio (1.12) than 69.44% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.12 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 5.41 | ||
| Altman-Z | 1.17 |
ROIC/WACC1.13
WACC4.43%
2.3 Liquidity
EN has a Current Ratio of 0.94. This is a bad value and indicates that EN is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
Looking at the Current ratio, with a value of 0.94, EN is doing worse than 75.00% of the companies in the same industry.
A Quick Ratio of 0.84 indicates that EN may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
The Quick ratio of EN (0.84) is worse than 63.89% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.94 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.84 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The Earnings Per Share has been growing slightly by 6.72% over the past year.
Measured over the past years, EN shows a decrease in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been decreasing by -4.80% on average per year.
The Revenue has grown by 17.04% in the past year. This is quite good.
Measured over the past years, EN shows a quite strong growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 9.52% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)6.72%
EPS 3Y14.79%
EPS 5Y-4.8%
EPS Q2Q%-5.56%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)17.04%
Revenue growth 3Y17.32%
Revenue growth 5Y9.52%
Sales Q2Q%2.56%
3.2 Future
The Earnings Per Share is expected to grow by 6.96% on average over the next years.
The Revenue is expected to grow by 0.36% on average over the next years.
EPS Next Y10%
EPS Next 2Y14.22%
EPS Next 3Y13.22%
EPS Next 5Y6.96%
Revenue Next Year2.9%
Revenue Next 2Y2.53%
Revenue Next 3Y2.39%
Revenue Next 5Y0.36%
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is accelerating: in the next years the growth will be better than in the last years.
The Revenue growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
A Price/Earnings ratio of 11.99 indicates a reasonable valuation of EN.
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, EN is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 72.22% of the companies are valued more expensively.
Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio of 24.41, EN is valued rather cheaply.
EN is valuated reasonably with a Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 8.39.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, EN is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 77.78% of the companies are valued more expensively.
EN is valuated cheaply when we compare the Price/Forward Earnings ratio to 20.59, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 11.99 | ||
| Fwd PE | 8.39 |
4.2 Price Multiples
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio of EN indicates a somewhat cheap valuation: EN is cheaper than 77.78% of the companies listed in the same industry.
EN's Price/Free Cash Flow ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. EN is cheaper than 83.33% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 4.43 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 4.33 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a correct valuation of the company.
EN's earnings are expected to grow with 13.22% in the coming years. This may justify a more expensive valuation.
PEG (NY)1.2
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y14.22%
EPS Next 3Y13.22%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
With a Yearly Dividend Yield of 5.83%, EN is a good candidate for dividend investing.
Compared to an average industry Dividend Yield of 3.37, EN pays a better dividend. On top of this EN pays more dividend than 97.22% of the companies listed in the same industry.
Compared to an average S&P500 Dividend Yield of 2.30, EN pays a better dividend.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 5.83% |
5.2 History
The dividend of EN has a limited annual growth rate of 1.25%.
Dividend Growth(5Y)1.25%
Div Incr Years1
Div Non Decr Years3
5.3 Sustainability
EN pays out 65.27% of its income as dividend. This is not a sustainable payout ratio.
The dividend of EN is growing, but earnings are growing more, so the dividend growth is sustainable.
DP65.27%
EPS Next 2Y14.22%
EPS Next 3Y13.22%
BOUYGUES SA
EPA:EN (7/26/2024, 7:00:00 PM)
32.37
+0.31 (+0.97%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorIndustrials
GICS IndustryGroupCapital Goods
GICS IndustryConstruction & Engineering
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners
Inst Owner Change
Ins Owners
Ins Owner Change
Market Cap12.14B
Analysts
Price Target
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 5.83% |
Dividend Growth(5Y)
DP
Div Incr Years
Div Non Decr Years
Ex-Date
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)
Avg EPS beat(2)
Min EPS beat(2)
Max EPS beat(2)
EPS beat(4)
Avg EPS beat(4)
Min EPS beat(4)
Max EPS beat(4)
EPS beat(8)
Avg EPS beat(8)
EPS beat(12)
Avg EPS beat(12)
EPS beat(16)
Avg EPS beat(16)
Revenue beat(2)
Avg Revenue beat(2)
Min Revenue beat(2)
Max Revenue beat(2)
Revenue beat(4)
Avg Revenue beat(4)
Min Revenue beat(4)
Max Revenue beat(4)
Revenue beat(8)
Avg Revenue beat(8)
Revenue beat(12)
Avg Revenue beat(12)
Revenue beat(16)
Avg Revenue beat(16)
PT rev (1m)
PT rev (3m)
EPS NQ rev (1m)
EPS NQ rev (3m)
EPS NY rev (1m)
EPS NY rev (3m)
Revenue NQ rev (1m)
Revenue NQ rev (3m)
Revenue NY rev (1m)
Revenue NY rev (3m)
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 11.99 | ||
| Fwd PE | 8.39 | ||
| P/S | |||
| P/FCF | |||
| P/OCF | |||
| P/B | |||
| P/tB | |||
| EV/EBITDA |
EPS(TTM)
EY
EPS(NY)
Fwd EY
FCF(TTM)
FCFY
OCF(TTM)
OCFY
SpS
BVpS
TBVpS
PEG (NY)1.2
PEG (5Y)N/A
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 1.71% | ||
| ROE | 8.4% | ||
| ROCE | |||
| ROIC | |||
| ROICexc | |||
| ROICexgc | |||
| OM | 3.9% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 1.83% | ||
| GM | 53.91% | ||
| FCFM |
ROA(3y)
ROA(5y)
ROE(3y)
ROE(5y)
ROIC(3y)
ROIC(5y)
ROICexc(3y)
ROICexc(5y)
ROICexgc(3y)
ROICexgc(5y)
ROCE(3y)
ROCE(5y)
ROICexcg growth 3Y
ROICexcg growth 5Y
ROICexc growth 3Y
ROICexc growth 5Y
OM growth 3Y
OM growth 5Y
PM growth 3Y
PM growth 5Y
GM growth 3Y
GM growth 5Y
F-Score
Asset Turnover0.94
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 1.12 | ||
| Debt/FCF | |||
| Debt/EBITDA | |||
| Cap/Depr | |||
| Cap/Sales | |||
| Interest Coverage | |||
| Cash Conversion | |||
| Profit Quality | |||
| Current Ratio | 0.94 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.84 | ||
| Altman-Z |
F-Score
WACC
ROIC/WACC
Cap/Depr(3y)
Cap/Depr(5y)
Cap/Sales(3y)
Cap/Sales(5y)
Profit Quality(3y)
Profit Quality(5y)
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)6.72%
EPS 3Y14.79%
EPS 5Y
EPS Q2Q%
EPS Next Y10%
EPS Next 2Y
EPS Next 3Y
EPS Next 5Y
Revenue 1Y (TTM)17.04%
Revenue growth 3Y17.32%
Revenue growth 5Y
Sales Q2Q%
Revenue Next Year
Revenue Next 2Y
Revenue Next 3Y
Revenue Next 5Y
EBIT growth 1Y
EBIT growth 3Y
EBIT growth 5Y
EBIT Next Year
EBIT Next 3Y
EBIT Next 5Y
FCF growth 1Y
FCF growth 3Y
FCF growth 5Y
OCF growth 1Y
OCF growth 3Y
OCF growth 5Y