CINEVERSE CORP (CNVS) Stock Fundamental Analysis
USA - NASDAQ:CNVS - US1724063086 - Common Stock
3.38 USD
-0.12 (-3.43%)
3.58 USD
+0.2 (+5.92%)
Taking everything into account, CNVS scores 4 out of 10 in our fundamental rating. CNVS was compared to 80 industry peers in the Entertainment industry. Both the profitability and the financial health of CNVS get a neutral evaluation. Nothing too spectacular is happening here. CNVS is not valued too expensively and it also shows a decent growth rate.
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year CNVS was profitable.
CNVS had a positive operating cash flow in the past year.
The reported net income has been mixed in the past 5 years: CNVS reported negative net income in multiple years.
The reported operating cash flow has been mixed in the past 5 years: CNVS reported negative operating cash flow in multiple years.
1.2 Ratios
CNVS has a better Return On Assets (4.49%) than 80.00% of its industry peers.
With a decent Return On Equity value of 7.45%, CNVS is doing good in the industry, outperforming 76.25% of the companies in the same industry.
CNVS has a better Return On Invested Capital (13.82%) than 91.25% of its industry peers.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 4.49% | ||
| ROE | 7.45% | ||
| ROIC | 13.82% |
ROA(3y)-13.6%
ROA(5y)-24.58%
ROE(3y)-27.36%
ROE(5y)-89.05%
ROIC(3y)N/A
ROIC(5y)N/A
1.3 Margins
CNVS has a better Profit Margin (3.44%) than 68.75% of its industry peers.
In the last couple of years the Profit Margin of CNVS has grown nicely.
With a decent Operating Margin value of 8.73%, CNVS is doing good in the industry, outperforming 71.25% of the companies in the same industry.
In the last couple of years the Operating Margin of CNVS has grown nicely.
CNVS has a Gross Margin (51.23%) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
In the last couple of years the Gross Margin of CNVS has declined.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 8.73% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 3.44% | ||
| GM | 51.23% |
OM growth 3Y72.9%
OM growth 5YN/A
PM growth 3Y8.97%
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-7.04%
GM growth 5Y-2.17%
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
CNVS has a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), which is just above the Cost of Capital (WACC), which means it is creating some value.
Compared to 1 year ago, CNVS has more shares outstanding
The number of shares outstanding for CNVS has been increased compared to 5 years ago.
CNVS has no outstanding debt. Therefor its Debt/Equity and Debt/FCF ratios are 0 and belong to the best of the industry.
2.2 Solvency
Based on the Altman-Z score of -8.17, we must say that CNVS is in the distress zone and has some risk of bankruptcy.
CNVS's Altman-Z score of -8.17 is on the low side compared to the rest of the industry. CNVS is outperformed by 81.25% of its industry peers.
The Debt to FCF ratio of CNVS is 0.90, which is an excellent value as it means it would take CNVS, only 0.90 years of fcf income to pay off all of its debts.
With an excellent Debt to FCF ratio value of 0.90, CNVS belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming 83.75% of the companies in the same industry.
CNVS has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.10. This is a healthy value indicating a solid balance between debt and equity.
The Debt to Equity ratio of CNVS (0.10) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.1 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 0.9 | ||
| Altman-Z | -8.17 |
ROIC/WACC1.45
WACC9.55%
2.3 Liquidity
A Current Ratio of 0.99 indicates that CNVS may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
CNVS's Current ratio of 0.99 is in line compared to the rest of the industry. CNVS outperforms 47.50% of its industry peers.
CNVS has a Quick Ratio of 0.99. This is a bad value and indicates that CNVS is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
With a Quick ratio value of 0.99, CNVS perfoms like the industry average, outperforming 50.00% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.99 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.99 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
The Earnings Per Share has grown by an impressive 115.38% over the past year.
CNVS shows a decrease in Earnings Per Share. Measured over the last years, the EPS has been decreasing by -3.06% yearly.
CNVS shows a strong growth in Revenue. In the last year, the Revenue has grown by 77.08%.
Measured over the past years, CNVS shows a quite strong growth in Revenue. The Revenue has been growing by 14.75% on average per year.
EPS 1Y (TTM)115.38%
EPS 3Y-3.06%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%-5%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)77.08%
Revenue growth 3Y11.7%
Revenue growth 5Y14.75%
Sales Q2Q%21.83%
3.2 Future
No EPS estimates are available, so we could not analyze the future EPS growth and evolution.
No Revenue estimates are available, so we could not analyze the future revenue growth and evolution.
EPS Next Y47.33%
EPS Next 2YN/A
EPS Next 3YN/A
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year0.46%
Revenue Next 2YN/A
Revenue Next 3YN/A
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
No EPS estimates are available, so we could not analyze the future EPS growth and evolution.
No Revenue estimates are available, so we could not analyze the future revenue growth and evolution.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
A Price/Earnings ratio of 42.25 indicates a quite expensive valuation of CNVS.
Based on the Price/Earnings ratio, CNVS is valued a bit cheaper than the industry average as 76.25% of the companies are valued more expensively.
Compared to an average S&P500 Price/Earnings ratio of 27.06, CNVS is valued quite expensively.
The Price/Forward Earnings ratio is 25.49, which means the current valuation is very expensive for CNVS.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, CNVS is valued a bit cheaper than 72.50% of the companies in the same industry.
CNVS is valuated at similar levels of the S&P average when we compare the Price/Forward Earnings ratio to 22.64, which is the current average of the S&P500 Index.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 42.25 | ||
| Fwd PE | 25.49 |
4.2 Price Multiples
88.75% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than CNVS, based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio.
88.75% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than CNVS, based on the Price/Free Cash Flow ratio.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 15.97 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 5.89 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The low PEG Ratio(NY), which compensates the Price/Earnings for growth, indicates a rather cheap valuation of the company.
PEG (NY)0.89
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2YN/A
EPS Next 3YN/A
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
No dividends for CNVS!.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
3.38
-0.12 (-3.43%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorCommunication Services
GICS IndustryGroupMedia & Entertainment
GICS IndustryEntertainment
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners15.81%
Inst Owner Change33.84%
Ins Owners13.53%
Ins Owner Change1.88%
Market Cap64.49M
Analysts82.5
Price Target8.67 (156.51%)
Short Float %3.5%
Short Ratio1.37
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | N/A |
Yearly DividendN/A
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
DPN/A
Div Incr Years0
Div Non Decr Years0
Ex-DateN/A
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)1
Avg EPS beat(2)-2.53%
Min EPS beat(2)-157.35%
Max EPS beat(2)152.29%
EPS beat(4)3
Avg EPS beat(4)7.67%
Min EPS beat(4)-157.35%
Max EPS beat(4)152.29%
EPS beat(8)5
Avg EPS beat(8)11.57%
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)2
Avg Revenue beat(2)7.03%
Min Revenue beat(2)6.87%
Max Revenue beat(2)7.19%
Revenue beat(4)4
Avg Revenue beat(4)10.02%
Min Revenue beat(4)6.87%
Max Revenue beat(4)16.23%
Revenue beat(8)4
Avg Revenue beat(8)-0.53%
Revenue beat(12)6
Avg Revenue beat(12)3%
Revenue beat(16)9
Avg Revenue beat(16)6.79%
PT rev (1m)0%
PT rev (3m)0%
EPS NQ rev (1m)-550%
EPS NQ rev (3m)-800%
EPS NY rev (1m)0%
EPS NY rev (3m)244.44%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)9.91%
Revenue NQ rev (3m)-0.39%
Revenue NY rev (1m)-0.52%
Revenue NY rev (3m)3.31%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 42.25 | ||
| Fwd PE | 25.49 | ||
| P/S | 0.8 | ||
| P/FCF | 15.97 | ||
| P/OCF | 14.02 | ||
| P/B | 1.74 | ||
| P/tB | 5.46 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 5.89 |
EPS(TTM)0.08
EY2.37%
EPS(NY)0.13
Fwd EY3.92%
FCF(TTM)0.21
FCFY6.26%
OCF(TTM)0.24
OCFY7.13%
SpS4.2
BVpS1.94
TBVpS0.62
PEG (NY)0.89
PEG (5Y)N/A
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 4.49% | ||
| ROE | 7.45% | ||
| ROCE | 19.23% | ||
| ROIC | 13.82% | ||
| ROICexc | 14.54% | ||
| ROICexgc | 43.24% | ||
| OM | 8.73% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 3.44% | ||
| GM | 51.23% | ||
| FCFM | 5.04% |
ROA(3y)-13.6%
ROA(5y)-24.58%
ROE(3y)-27.36%
ROE(5y)-89.05%
ROIC(3y)N/A
ROIC(5y)N/A
ROICexc(3y)N/A
ROICexc(5y)N/A
ROICexgc(3y)N/A
ROICexgc(5y)N/A
ROCE(3y)N/A
ROCE(5y)N/A
ROICexcg growth 3YN/A
ROICexcg growth 5YN/A
ROICexc growth 3Y117.54%
ROICexc growth 5YN/A
OM growth 3Y72.9%
OM growth 5YN/A
PM growth 3Y8.97%
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-7.04%
GM growth 5Y-2.17%
F-Score7
Asset Turnover1.3
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.1 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 0.9 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 0.33 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 14.09% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 0.7% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 8.81 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 41.84% | ||
| Profit Quality | 146.3% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.99 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.99 | ||
| Altman-Z | -8.17 |
F-Score7
WACC9.55%
ROIC/WACC1.45
Cap/Depr(3y)30.78%
Cap/Depr(5y)28.81%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.85%
Cap/Sales(5y)3%
Profit Quality(3y)N/A
Profit Quality(5y)N/A
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)115.38%
EPS 3Y-3.06%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%-5%
EPS Next Y47.33%
EPS Next 2YN/A
EPS Next 3YN/A
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)77.08%
Revenue growth 3Y11.7%
Revenue growth 5Y14.75%
Sales Q2Q%21.83%
Revenue Next Year0.46%
Revenue Next 2YN/A
Revenue Next 3YN/A
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y504.16%
EBIT growth 3Y93.13%
EBIT growth 5YN/A
EBIT Next Year94.27%
EBIT Next 3YN/A
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y132.94%
FCF growth 3Y56.46%
FCF growth 5Y20.06%
OCF growth 1Y142.37%
OCF growth 3Y52.8%
OCF growth 5Y17.54%