FLAGSHIP COMMUNITIES REIT UT (MHC-U.CA) Stock Fundamental Analysis
Canada - Toronto Stock Exchange - TSX:MHC-U - CA33843T1084 - REIT
17.77 USD
-0.23 (-1.28%)
Taking everything into account, MHC-U scores 5 out of 10 in our fundamental rating. MHC-U was compared to 14 industry peers in the Residential REITs industry. There are concerns on the financial health of MHC-U while its profitability can be described as average. MHC-U is valued quite cheap, while showing a decent growth score. This is a good combination!
1. Profitability
1.1 Basic Checks
In the past year MHC-U was profitable.
In the past year MHC-U had a positive cash flow from operations.
Each year in the past 5 years MHC-U has been profitable.
MHC-U had a positive operating cash flow in each of the past 5 years.
1.2 Ratios
MHC-U's Return On Assets of 7.71% is amongst the best of the industry. MHC-U outperforms 92.86% of its industry peers.
With an excellent Return On Equity value of 14.74%, MHC-U belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming 92.86% of the companies in the same industry.
With a Return On Invested Capital value of 1.89%, MHC-U is not doing good in the industry: 78.57% of the companies in the same industry are doing better.
The Average Return On Invested Capital over the past 3 years for MHC-U is in line with the industry average of 3.07%.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 7.71% | ||
| ROE | 14.74% | ||
| ROIC | 1.89% |
ROA(3y)7.29%
ROA(5y)8.23%
ROE(3y)14.85%
ROE(5y)19.09%
ROIC(3y)3.82%
ROIC(5y)N/A
1.3 Margins
With an excellent Profit Margin value of 95.58%, MHC-U belongs to the best of the industry, outperforming 92.86% of the companies in the same industry.
MHC-U's Profit Margin has declined in the last couple of years.
Looking at the Operating Margin, with a value of 29.08%, MHC-U is in line with its industry, outperforming 42.86% of the companies in the same industry.
MHC-U has a Gross Margin of 66.19%. This is in the better half of the industry: MHC-U outperforms 64.29% of its industry peers.
MHC-U's Gross Margin has been stable in the last couple of years.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 29.08% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 95.58% | ||
| GM | 66.19% |
OM growth 3YN/A
OM growth 5YN/A
PM growth 3Y-5.53%
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-0.11%
GM growth 5YN/A
2. Health
2.1 Basic Checks
With a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) below the Cost of Capital (WACC), MHC-U is destroying value.
MHC-U has more shares outstanding than it did 1 year ago.
MHC-U has a better debt/assets ratio than last year.
2.2 Solvency
Based on the Altman-Z score of 0.69, we must say that MHC-U is in the distress zone and has some risk of bankruptcy.
MHC-U has a Altman-Z score (0.69) which is in line with its industry peers.
MHC-U has a debt to FCF ratio of 8.01. This is a slightly negative value and a sign of low solvency as MHC-U would need 8.01 years to pay back of all of its debts.
MHC-U has a better Debt to FCF ratio (8.01) than 92.86% of its industry peers.
MHC-U has a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.70. This is a neutral value indicating MHC-U is somewhat dependend on debt financing.
MHC-U has a Debt to Equity ratio (0.70) which is comparable to the rest of the industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.7 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 8.01 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.69 |
ROIC/WACC0.3
WACC6.25%
2.3 Liquidity
MHC-U has a Current Ratio of 0.15. This is a bad value and indicates that MHC-U is not financially healthy enough and could expect problems in meeting its short term obligations.
MHC-U has a Current ratio of 0.15. This is comparable to the rest of the industry: MHC-U outperforms 57.14% of its industry peers.
A Quick Ratio of 0.15 indicates that MHC-U may have some problems paying its short term obligations.
The Quick ratio of MHC-U (0.15) is comparable to the rest of the industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.15 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.15 |
3. Growth
3.1 Past
MHC-U shows a strong growth in Earnings Per Share. In the last year, the EPS has been growing by 18.95%, which is quite good.
Measured over the past 5 years, MHC-U shows a small growth in Earnings Per Share. The EPS has been growing by 3.54% on average per year.
The Revenue has grown by 19.90% in the past year. This is quite good.
The Revenue has been growing by 26.95% on average over the past years. This is a very strong growth!
EPS 1Y (TTM)18.95%
EPS 3Y3.54%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%2.96%
Revenue 1Y (TTM)19.9%
Revenue growth 3Y26.95%
Revenue growth 5YN/A
Sales Q2Q%12.31%
3.2 Future
The Earnings Per Share is expected to decrease by -24.94% on average over the next years. This is quite bad
MHC-U is expected to show quite a strong growth in Revenue. In the coming years, the Revenue will grow by 10.93% yearly.
EPS Next Y-12.61%
EPS Next 2Y-38.28%
EPS Next 3Y-24.94%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue Next Year18.05%
Revenue Next 2Y14.74%
Revenue Next 3Y10.93%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
3.3 Evolution
The EPS growth rate is decreasing: in the next years the growth will be less than in the last years.
Although the future Revenue growth is still strong, it is not able to hold up the even more excellent growth rate of the past years.
4. Valuation
4.1 Price/Earnings Ratio
With a Price/Earnings ratio of 3.38, the valuation of MHC-U can be described as very cheap.
Compared to the rest of the industry, the Price/Earnings ratio of MHC-U indicates a rather cheap valuation: MHC-U is cheaper than 100.00% of the companies listed in the same industry.
When comparing the Price/Earnings ratio of MHC-U to the average of the S&P500 Index (26.29), we can say MHC-U is valued rather cheaply.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of 9.16, the valuation of MHC-U can be described as reasonable.
Based on the Price/Forward Earnings ratio, MHC-U is valued cheaply inside the industry as 100.00% of the companies are valued more expensively.
When comparing the Price/Forward Earnings ratio of MHC-U to the average of the S&P500 Index (23.51), we can say MHC-U is valued rather cheaply.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 3.38 | ||
| Fwd PE | 9.16 |
4.2 Price Multiples
78.57% of the companies in the same industry are more expensive than MHC-U, based on the Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio.
MHC-U's Price/Free Cash Flow ratio is rather cheap when compared to the industry. MHC-U is cheaper than 85.71% of the companies in the same industry.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/FCF | 4.39 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 23.32 |
4.3 Compensation for Growth
The decent profitability rating of MHC-U may justify a higher PE ratio.
MHC-U's earnings are expected to decrease with -24.94% in the coming years. This may justify a cheaper valuation.
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
EPS Next 2Y-38.28%
EPS Next 3Y-24.94%
5. Dividend
5.1 Amount
MHC-U has a Yearly Dividend Yield of 3.17%. Purely for dividend investing, there may be better candidates out there.
MHC-U's Dividend Yield is slightly below the industry average, which is at 4.80.
MHC-U's Dividend Yield is a higher than the S&P500 average which is at 2.31.
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.17% |
5.2 History
MHC-U has been paying a dividend for over 5 years, so it has already some track record.
MHC-U has not decreased its dividend in the last 3 years.
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
Div Incr Years4
Div Non Decr Years4
5.3 Sustainability
MHC-U pays out 16.20% of its income as dividend. This is a sustainable payout ratio.
DP16.2%
EPS Next 2Y-38.28%
EPS Next 3Y-24.94%
TSX:MHC-U (12/9/2025, 7:00:00 PM)
17.77
-0.23 (-1.28%)
Chartmill FA Rating
GICS SectorReal Estate
GICS IndustryGroupEquity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
GICS IndustryResidential REITs
Earnings (Last)
Earnings (Next)
Inst Owners40.87%
Inst Owner ChangeN/A
Ins Owners0.55%
Ins Owner ChangeN/A
Market Cap344.74M
Revenue(TTM)99.69M
Net Income(TTM)95.27M
Analysts83.53
Price Target23.8 (33.93%)
Short Float %N/A
Short RatioN/A
Dividend
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.17% |
Yearly Dividend1.13
Dividend Growth(5Y)N/A
DP16.2%
Div Incr Years4
Div Non Decr Years4
Ex-Date
Surprises & Revisions
EPS beat(2)N/A
Avg EPS beat(2)N/A
Min EPS beat(2)N/A
Max EPS beat(2)N/A
EPS beat(4)N/A
Avg EPS beat(4)N/A
Min EPS beat(4)N/A
Max EPS beat(4)N/A
EPS beat(8)N/A
Avg EPS beat(8)N/A
EPS beat(12)N/A
Avg EPS beat(12)N/A
EPS beat(16)N/A
Avg EPS beat(16)N/A
Revenue beat(2)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(2)N/A
Min Revenue beat(2)N/A
Max Revenue beat(2)N/A
Revenue beat(4)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(4)N/A
Min Revenue beat(4)N/A
Max Revenue beat(4)N/A
Revenue beat(8)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(8)N/A
Revenue beat(12)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(12)N/A
Revenue beat(16)N/A
Avg Revenue beat(16)N/A
PT rev (1m)3.96%
PT rev (3m)5%
EPS NQ rev (1m)N/A
EPS NQ rev (3m)N/A
EPS NY rev (1m)28.4%
EPS NY rev (3m)28.4%
Revenue NQ rev (1m)N/A
Revenue NQ rev (3m)N/A
Revenue NY rev (1m)2.61%
Revenue NY rev (3m)2.59%
Valuation
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 3.38 | ||
| Fwd PE | 9.16 | ||
| P/S | 2.5 | ||
| P/FCF | 4.39 | ||
| P/OCF | 4.34 | ||
| P/B | 0.39 | ||
| P/tB | 0.39 | ||
| EV/EBITDA | 23.32 |
EPS(TTM)5.25
EY29.54%
EPS(NY)1.94
Fwd EY10.92%
FCF(TTM)4.05
FCFY22.77%
OCF(TTM)4.09
OCFY23.03%
SpS7.12
BVpS46.14
TBVpS46.14
PEG (NY)N/A
PEG (5Y)N/A
Graham Number73.82
Profitability
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROA | 7.71% | ||
| ROE | 14.74% | ||
| ROCE | 2.63% | ||
| ROIC | 1.89% | ||
| ROICexc | 1.91% | ||
| ROICexgc | 1.91% | ||
| OM | 29.08% | ||
| PM (TTM) | 95.58% | ||
| GM | 66.19% | ||
| FCFM | 56.87% |
ROA(3y)7.29%
ROA(5y)8.23%
ROE(3y)14.85%
ROE(5y)19.09%
ROIC(3y)3.82%
ROIC(5y)N/A
ROICexc(3y)3.88%
ROICexc(5y)N/A
ROICexgc(3y)3.88%
ROICexgc(5y)N/A
ROCE(3y)5.36%
ROCE(5y)N/A
ROICexgc growth 3YN/A
ROICexgc growth 5YN/A
ROICexc growth 3YN/A
ROICexc growth 5YN/A
OM growth 3YN/A
OM growth 5YN/A
PM growth 3Y-5.53%
PM growth 5YN/A
GM growth 3Y-0.11%
GM growth 5YN/A
F-Score7
Asset Turnover0.08
Health
| Industry Rank | Sector Rank | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Debt/Equity | 0.7 | ||
| Debt/FCF | 8.01 | ||
| Debt/EBITDA | 15.37 | ||
| Cap/Depr | 124.42% | ||
| Cap/Sales | 0.64% | ||
| Interest Coverage | 1.45 | ||
| Cash Conversion | 194.29% | ||
| Profit Quality | 59.5% | ||
| Current Ratio | 0.15 | ||
| Quick Ratio | 0.15 | ||
| Altman-Z | 0.69 |
F-Score7
WACC6.25%
ROIC/WACC0.3
Cap/Depr(3y)345.48%
Cap/Depr(5y)313.17%
Cap/Sales(3y)1.81%
Cap/Sales(5y)1.51%
Profit Quality(3y)59.32%
Profit Quality(5y)45.19%
High Growth Momentum
Growth
EPS 1Y (TTM)18.95%
EPS 3Y3.54%
EPS 5YN/A
EPS Q2Q%2.96%
EPS Next Y-12.61%
EPS Next 2Y-38.28%
EPS Next 3Y-24.94%
EPS Next 5YN/A
Revenue 1Y (TTM)19.9%
Revenue growth 3Y26.95%
Revenue growth 5YN/A
Sales Q2Q%12.31%
Revenue Next Year18.05%
Revenue Next 2Y14.74%
Revenue Next 3Y10.93%
Revenue Next 5YN/A
EBIT growth 1Y-32.67%
EBIT growth 3YN/A
EBIT growth 5YN/A
EBIT Next Year13.76%
EBIT Next 3Y11.34%
EBIT Next 5YN/A
FCF growth 1Y61.93%
FCF growth 3Y29.2%
FCF growth 5YN/A
OCF growth 1Y58.69%
OCF growth 3Y28.5%
OCF growth 5YN/A
FLAGSHIP COMMUNITIES REIT UT / MHC-U.CA FAQ
Can you provide the ChartMill fundamental rating for FLAGSHIP COMMUNITIES REIT UT?
ChartMill assigns a fundamental rating of 5 / 10 to MHC-U.CA.
What is the valuation status for MHC-U stock?
ChartMill assigns a valuation rating of 7 / 10 to FLAGSHIP COMMUNITIES REIT UT (MHC-U.CA). This can be considered as Undervalued.
Can you provide the profitability details for FLAGSHIP COMMUNITIES REIT UT?
FLAGSHIP COMMUNITIES REIT UT (MHC-U.CA) has a profitability rating of 6 / 10.
How financially healthy is FLAGSHIP COMMUNITIES REIT UT?
The financial health rating of FLAGSHIP COMMUNITIES REIT UT (MHC-U.CA) is 3 / 10.
Can you provide the dividend sustainability for MHC-U stock?
The dividend rating of FLAGSHIP COMMUNITIES REIT UT (MHC-U.CA) is 4 / 10 and the dividend payout ratio is 16.2%.